Category Archives: Lexicology

April 14, 2025

 

On April 14, 1828, Noah Webster, that lexicographical colossus, that indefatigable codifier of a nascent nation’s tongue, unleashed upon the world his two-volume American Dictionary of the English Language—a staggering 70,000 words, priced at $20 a set, a veritable bargain for the sheer audacity of its ambition.  Webster, with his fierce American nationalism, standardized the spelling—think “color” sans the superfluous u, “organize” with a zesty z—and rooted his definitions in the raw, evolving speech of the early U.S. When sales tanked, he slashed the price to $15, and lo, the Webster legacy was born, a nation’s voice defined, a middle finger to colonial cultural shackles. This was lexicography as rebellion, as patriotism, a man not just defining words but defining an identity, a people, a dream!  Damn right.

But oh, how the mighty have fallen! Fast-forward to the last seven years, and poor Noah, that titan of linguistic purity, would be clawing his way out of his grave, screaming in abject horror at the woke, progressive, cultural-Marxist takeover of his beloved Merriam-Webster! The dictionary—his sacred legacy—has been hijacked by a cabal of language-bending ideological idiots, twisting definitions to align with the simpering, sanctimonious zeitgeist of social justice warriors and their dim-witted ilk!  I can hear the woke now, howling and bitching, gnawing on my doorknob, trying to get in and whine.  But look at the evidence, you sheep, the proof is in the pudding: “male” and “female” redefined to include “gender identity,” as in “having a gender identity that is the opposite of female” for male—since when did biology bow to feelings? “Boy” and “girl” now tethered to “gender identity” rather than, you know, reality—a boy as “a child whose gender identity is male,” a girl vice versa. This isn’t lexicography; this is madness, a semantic coup d’état!

And it gets worse! The term “homosexual” as a noun—gone, erased by Dictionary.com for its “clinical connotations,” replaced with the oh-so-chic “gay,” as if history itself can be scrubbed clean by the woke police! “Colorblind” now comes with a sanctimonious note that while it might mean freedom from racial prejudice, it could also—gasp!—suggest a failure to “acknowledge systemic racial inequities.” “Anti-vaxxer” expanded to include not just vaccine skeptics but those who dare oppose mandates—a nod to the COVID-19 culture wars, a slap in the face to individual liberty! And don’t get me started on “climate change” morphing into “climate crisis,” a term dripping with activist urgency, or “unique” being watered down to allow modifiers like “very”—a grammatical sacrilege that would make Webster weep!

This isn’t evolution, you fools, it’s capitulation! This isn’t a goddamn French dictionary…no reason for surrender here.  Merriam-Webster claims they’re documenting “contemporary language use,” but what they’re really doing is kowtowing to the cultural left, bending the knee to every passing fad—be it gender fluidity, racial grievance, or environmental hysteria! Noah Webster didn’t just define words; he defined a nation’s voice, its spine, its grit. Now his legacy is a plaything for the perpetually aggrieved, a tool for ideological conformity. He’d be spinning in his grave, I tell you, spinning at 10,000 RPM, a lexicographical centrifuge of rage, watching his dictionary—his life’s work—turned into a manifesto for the woke apocalypse! We’re through the looking glass, dear reader, and the dictionary’s been leading the charge—stop the madness!

N.P.: “Enter My Mind” – Drain

Word of the Day – inchoate

Alright, my dearest literary renegades, it’s time to sharpen your quills and dive into today’s word of the day: inchoate. This is the perfect word for those of us who live for the messy, half-formed brilliance of a story still finding its fangs. So let us tear into it like a pack of wolves on a full moon.

Inchoate (adj): Just beginning, not fully formed, or still a chaotic mess—like a half-baked plan to rob a bank or the first draft of my novel where the characters are still figuring out who the hell they are. It’s the embryonic stage of something big, but right now, it’s a hot mess of potential, teetering on the edge of greatness or disaster.

This gem comes from the Latin inchoatus, the past participle of inchoare, meaning “to begin” or “to start.” Break it down further, and you’ve got in- (into) and cohum (the strap of a yoke), so it’s got this vibe of hitching up the oxen to start plowing a field—except the field’s a shitstorm and the oxen are drunk. It slunk into English in the 1530s, and it’s been the perfect word for describing anything that’s still a rough draft of itself ever since.

I’m a bit behind schedule today, so I don’t have the time or bandwidth to come up with a story that’ll make you snort-laugh into your whiskey.  So instead, you’ll get this:

Frankie “Two-Fingers” Malone, a small-time crook with big-time dreams, is holed up in a dive bar, scribbling his master plan on a cocktail napkin. He’s got a crew of misfits—Vinny the Snitch, Carla the Klepto, and a guy they just call “Mouth” because he never shuts up—huddled around him, trying to make sense of his inchoate scheme to steal the mayor’s prized taxidermy peacock. “So we, uh, bust in at midnight, right?” Frankie slurs, smudging the ink with his sweaty thumb. “Then Vinny… does somethin’ with a crowbar, and Carla, you… fuck, I dunno, grab the bird?” The crew stares at him, mouths agape, as Mouth mutters, “This plan’s so half-assed, it’s practically mooning us.” Frankie slams his fist on the table, spilling his beer. “It’s a work in progress, assholes—genius takes time!”

Sorry for such a hack job, dear reader, but I’ve got a big, hairy deliverable due tonight, and Mgmt is acting rather adamant about this deadline.

N.P.: “Century’s End” – Donald Fagen

Word of the Day – somnolent

Happy Sunday, dear and I’m assuming by some of the mail I’ve received lately, occasionally drunk reader.  Today we crack open Uncle Jayson’s lexical grimoire and snort a line of pure lexicological blow.  Today’s word is somnolent, a slinky little adjective that slithers into your brain like a quaalude-laced dream.  As you likely know by now, dear reader, having endured the ruthless and brutal assault by the Woke on the entire English language, I no longer refer students to what-used-to-be trusted dictionaries for reliable definitions.  In fact it will soon be time to wage open war against the likes of Merriam-Webster, The OED, and the Cambridge Dictionary, and the rest of their pathetic ilk who became intentionally unable to define simple terms like “woman” for fear of angering The Mob.  But until I publish my own correct dictionary, we’re stuck with these losers.  So, according to the pussies over at Merriam-Webster, somnolent means “inclined to or heavy with sleep; drowsy,” but it’s got a deeper, slightly more sinister vibe – like the kind of torpor that hits you after a three-day bender on bootleg mezcal and existential dread.

Etymologically, it’s a highfalutin’ French-Latin mashup, from the Old French somnolent and Latin somnolentus, both rooted in somnus (sleep), the same root that gives us “insomnia” for all you night-owl freaks who can’t stop doomscrolling X at 3 a.m. It’s been narcotizing the English language since the 15th century, and it’s here to drag us into its hazy, half-conscious underworld.

I’m holed up in my favorite fleabag motel off Route 66, the kind of place where the roaches have unionized and the neon sign buzzes like a dying star. I’m three Red Bulls deep, trying to bang out a 5,000-word screed on the semiotics of reality TV for some pretentious lit mag, when my neighbor—a tweaked-out conspiracy theorist named Carl who claims he’s been probed by Martian IRS agents—starts pounding on the wall, screaming about chemtrails turning his goldfish into a communist. I’m somnolent as fuck, my brain a swamp of half-formed sentences and caffeine tremors, when Carl kicks down my door, buck-naked except for a tinfoil codpiece, waving a BB gun and yelling, “The lizard people are in the mini fridge!” I grab my laptop, hurl a half-eaten burrito at his head, and bolt into the desert night, leaving that motel hellhole to its own deranged circadian collapse. Moral of the story? Never trust a man who thinks his goldfish is reading Das Kapital.

That’s it, dear reader—somnolent, a word that captures the drooling edge of consciousness where nightmares and absurdity collide. Now go forth, wield it like a switchblade, and carve some chaos into your day.

N.P.: “Hot Stuff” – Blue October

Word of the Day – diffident

Okay, dear reader, it’s time for your daily dose of linguistic debauchery. Today’s word is diffident.  I used it late last night in reference to some rather limp-wristed whiskey.

Diffident (adj) means shy, reserved, or lacking in self-confidence—like a wallflower at an orgy who’s too scared to grab the lube.

This little gem comes from the Latin diffidere, meaning “to mistrust” or “to lack faith,” from dis- (apart) and fidere (to trust). Picture some toga-clad Roman stammering in the Forum, too chickenshit to ask Cleopatra for a quickie. It slunk into English in the 15th century, and we’ve been using it to describe spineless bastards ever since.

So there’s this diffident fucker, Larry, at the bar—sweaty palms, shifty eyes, the whole pathetic package. He’s been eyeballing this tattooed goddess with a rack like a Renaissance painting for an hour, but does he make a move? Hell no. He’s over there nursing his fifth PBR, muttering to himself about how she’d probably rather bang a cactus than his scrawny ass. Finally, his buddy Dave—six-foot-four and built like a Viking on a bender—drags him over, slaps him on the back, and yells, “Oi, Sheila, this shy little boy wants to buy you a shot!” Sheila smirks, downs the tequila, and says, “Grow some balls, Larry, and I might let you lick the salt off me next time.”

Don’t be Larry, dear reader.  Fortune favors the bold, and so does Sheila and her ilk.  And that’s it—diffident: the word for when your spine’s on vacation and your libido’s crying in the corner.

N.P.: “She Is Beautiful” – Andrew W.K.

Word of the Day – Sybaritic

Does your life lack unrestrained indulgence?  Do you gaze wistfully at people with silk sheets, wine cellars, and a suspiciously large collection of imported cheeses?  Well then, dear reader, it’s time to add the word “sybaritic” t your vocabulary arsenal.  Not because it will fix your life, but because it’ll make you sound sexier than that guy at the party who can’t shut up about his artisanal olives.  Dig:
Sybaritic (adj):  a love for sensual luxury or pleasure. Picture decadent feasts, velvet robes, and candlelight champagne baths.
Imagine someone lounging in an infinity pool atop a private  villa, sipping champagne, while a butler fans them with palm leaves.  That’s sybaritic.  Now imagine the rest of us eating instant ramen while staring at an Amazon cart full of shit we can’t afford.  That’s…well, not sybaritic.
This gloriously decadent word comes all the way from Sybaris, an ancient Greek city in southern Italy whose inhabitants were famous for living it up like rock stars in toga form.  They were all about good food, good wine, and the general art of treating yoself.  Tragically, the city was eventually destroyed by their very, very un-chill neighbors.  But did they die with regrets?  Probably not.  They were too busy eating grapes off a golden platter.

Last Friday night, my friend Miranda invited me to a “wine and charcuterie experience” at her downtown loft.  Naturally, I assumed this was code for “two bottles of Yellow Tail and a block of sweaty cheddar.”  I wasn’t ready for what greeted me when I stepped through the door.
Imagine chandeliers dripping with crystals (real, not Ikea).  A man in a bowler hat playing the violin for no apparent reason.  Trays of hors d’oeuvres I couldn’t pronounce (am I supposed to eat caviar with my fingers, or will I get arrested?).   Every square inch screamed, “Welcome to a lifestyle you will probably never be able to afford.
I should have bowed out gracefully and gone home to Netflix and stale pretzels, but no.  Like an idiot, I stayed.  By my fourth glass of fancy red with a name longer than my rent contract, I was feeling great.  Until, of course, I made the questionable decision to sit on the Moroccan couch.  You know, the $10,000 centerpiece that you look at but don’t touch?  Yeah, I touched it – with a glass of Malbec in hand.  One clumsy elbow later, there was a rather artistic wine stain sprawling across the pristine fabric.  Miranda’s jaw dropped so hard, I thought it might crack on the marble floor.  “Are you…serious right now?” she hissed, her voice thick with barely suppressed rage.
“What can I say?” I slurred with a self-deprecating shrug.  “The sybaritic life style may not be for me.”
She did not laugh.
The moral is, of course, that some of us are meant for a world of wine and luxury, and some of us should just stick to boxed rosé and Netflix.  Know your limits, dear reader, and keep your accidental chaos away from $10K couches.

N.P.: “Captain Love” – The Winery Dogs

Word of the Day: parvenu

Parvenu (n): A person who’s clawed their way up from humble beginnings to wealth or status, often with all the subtlety of a bullhorn in a library. Think nouveau riche with a side of try-hard—someone who’s got the cash but not the class, and everyone fucking knows it.
Straight from the French, parvenu comes from the verb parvenir, meaning “to arrive” or “to succeed,” rooted in Latin pervenire (“to come through”). It’s been strutting around English since the early 19th century, sneering at old money while flashing its gaudy new watch. The vibe? Freshly minted swagger with a whiff of desperation.
So, picture this: Jimmy “Two-Toes” Malone—yeah, he lost the other eight in a lawnmower incident he doesn’t talk about—hits the Powerball for $87 million and goes full parvenu overnight. We’re talking a guy who used to shotgun Busch Light in a trailer park, now strutting into a Michelin-starred joint in a leopard-print tuxedo, reeking of Axe body spray and entitlement. He’s got a date—some chick named Tiffani with an “i” who’s already mentally spending his winnings on a yacht called Titz McGee—and he’s barking at the waiter, “Bring me the fuckin’ caviar, none of that cheap shit!” The waiter, a wiry dude named Claude who’s seen it all, just smirks and drops a $400 spoonful of fish eggs in front of him. Jimmy shovels it in, gags like he’s choking on a golf ball, and yells, “Tastes like salty asshole!”—loud enough the whole place goes silent. Tiffani’s mortified, Claude’s plotting revenge, and Jimmy, oblivious, slaps a wad of hundreds on the table, hollering, “Keep the change, peasant!” as he stumbles out, leaving a trail of spilled champagne and shattered dignity. Moral? Money buys a lot, but it don’t buy you a goddamn clue.
N.P.: “Helter P.T.2 – Apoptygma Berzerk Remix” – kinGeorg

Word of the Day: sodden

Word of the Day: sodden

1a :  dull or expressionless especially from continued indulgence in alcoholic beverages <sodden features>

b :  torpid, sluggish <sodden minds>

2a :  heavy with or as if with moisture or water <the sodden ground>

b :  heavy or doughy because of imperfect cooking <sodden biscuits>

On Valentine’s Day, after downing his seventh beer at the annual singles’ mixer, Jim sat there, sodden, with the expression of a mannequin that had seen too much of the world – his face as blank as a freshly wiped whiteboard, staring into the void with the enthusiasm of a sloth on a lazy Sunday. Around him, couples danced like they were in a rom-com, while Jim, lost in his own soggy contemplation, was more like a forgotten extra in a B-movie about loneliness. His only companion was the empty bottle in his hand, which he treated like a date, even giving it a little Valentine’s Day kiss before realizing it wasn’t reciprocating.

N.P.: “Hurt” – Steve Welsh

Word of the Day: suppurate

suppurate
verb
1.  undergo the formation of pus; fester
Here’s why you should know and love this word: most obviously, it has to do with festering pus.  Which would be plenty enough reason to deploy the word liberally in your daily business communication.  But wait…there’s more.  Though officially the word is pronounced “supp-yer-ate,” people in the Midwest (and yrs. truly) pronounce it “super ate.”  Yes…just like the franchise of cheap and sleazy motels.  So the next time you’re driving along and hear a commercial inviting you to spend a night at the Super 8 Motel, you should, like me, cackle adolescently.
N.P.: “Peek-a-Boo” – Leæther Strip

Word of the Day: doxy

Word of the Day: doxy
noun
archaic
1. a lover or mistress
2. a prostitute
“He was pretty surprised when he thought her stage name was Doxy, but once he found out that that was her birth name, he knew her tornado-bait parents had doomed her to this life: she never had a chance.”

N.P.: “Holy Touch” – Foxy Shazam

Word(s) of the Day: vengeance and retribution

One of the reasons I’m so excited about 2025 is that I can finally tell you about specific things going on as opposed to the boring vagaries we’ve been forced to deal in for the last decade.  I’ll be getting much more personal in the future.

A theme that will no doubt be annoyingly recurring will be that of Revenge.  My dear reader has no idea how significant Revenge is in my life.  In anybody else, it would be a problem.  Or at least an issue one should probably discuss with a mental health professional.  Fortunately for all concerned, I am not anybody else.  I work in revenge the way the Inuit work in scrimshaw.  Much more on this later.  For now, for today’s Word(s) of the Day, let us compare and contrast two words used for revenge, that are often used interchangeably, but actually have significantly different meanings and embody distinct concepts shaped by their underlying motivations and societal roles: Vengeance and Retribution.

Vengeance is deeply personal, rooted in emotion and often fueled by anger or a need for personal revenge.  It is characterized by a desire to make the perpetrator suffer as a form of personal satisfaction.  A classic example of vengeance is found in Shakespeare’s “Hamlet,” where the protagonist is consumed by the need to avenge his father’s murder, which consumption is quite familiar to me.  This quest for personal revenge drives Hamlet to take drastic and often irrational actions, highlighting the emotional turmoil and chaos vengeance can unleash.  Fuck yes!  Love it!

In contrast, retribution is more calculated and objective, often emerging from a sense of justice.  It seeks to restore balance by ensuring that punishment is proportionate to the offense.  This concept is foundational to legal systems around the world, where retribution is achieved through structured penalties designed to deter future wrongdoing and maintain social order.  An example of retribution is the character of Javert in “Les Miserable.”  Javert is fixated on upholding the law and delivering justice, relentlessly pursuing Jean Valjean to ensure he pays for his past crimes.  His unwavering commitment to retribution underscores the Disneyesque principle of justice over personal vendetta.

These concepts not only populate literature but also permeate societal frameworks, where they influence how justice is perceived and administered.  Vengeance often leads to cycles of retaliation, lacking the fairness and balance that retribution seeks to uphold, and most societies regard this as a bad thing.  Retribution, while striving for justice, almost always becomes rigid and unyielding, as seen in Javert’s strict adherence to the law, which ultimately blinds him to the nuances of human morality.

I understand both sides.  However, as usual, in practice, I find the entire dichotomy between vengeance and retribution unnecessary: there is no need to choose either/or.  I’ve found that usually both are needed for true justice to be done.  At least that’s how I do it.  This was never a conscious decision by me…I just noticed a couple of years ago that this is how I handle people fucking with me.  I go for retribution first, for two reasons: 1) retribution usually involves time limits (things like statutes of limitation, time between an incident occurring and your reporting of said incident, et cetera, whereas vengeance has no such constraints), and 2) it will look better later if your vengeance lands you in hot water.  Retribution in most cases typically means calling the police or involving whatever civic authorities are appropriate, then allowing them to respond and mete out justice as society sees fit.  Because the society in which I live is run by incompetent cowards, the results of this will always be pathetically weak and lacking.  In my experience, this has been the case 100% of the time.  At best, you can expect half-assed, pusillanimous, and insouciant gestures rather than any actual justice.   So then one must turn to good ol’ meat-eating, whiskey-drinking, I-will-wear-your-fucking-skin-and-dance-around-my-house vengeance.  Vengeance has no statute of limitations, no real limitations of any kind, really.  The only guidance I take regarding vengeance comes from Sun Tzu: Let your plans be dark and impenetrable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt.

N.P.: “The Devil You Know” – Blues Saraceno