Monthly Archives: September 2025

September 9, 2025

 

Put your drinking cap on, dear reader, because today we’re raising a glass – or, more accurately, several glasses, straight from the bottle, no chaser needed – for the one, the only, Count Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy.  Born on this day in 1828, a man so monumentally, so titanically extra that his own life reads like a novel he’d have probably edited down for being too unbelievable.

Let’s be brutally, painfully honest for a moment.  Who amongst us hasn’t, in the throes of some ill-advised, 3 a.m. intellectual fugue state, picked up War and Peace with the genuine, albeit deeply misguided, intention of actually finishing it?  You see its heft, its sheer gravitational pull on your bookshelf, and you think, “Yes.  This is it.  This is the literary Everest I shall conquer.”  Then, 150 pages and approximately 4,729 character introductions later, you’re weeping into your lukewarm coffee, realizing you’ve made a terrible, terrible mistake.  And that, dear reader, is the genius of Tolstoy.  He makes you feel intellectually inadequate from beyond the grave, and you somehow thank him for it.

The man was a walking contradiction.  A bona fide aristocrat who wanted to be a peasant.  A soldier who became a pacifist.  A renowned sinner who spent the back half of his life penning moral treatises with the kind of high-minded sanctimony that would make a saint blush.  Imagine writing Anna Karenina – a sprawling, heartbreaking epic of adultery, societal ruin, and existential despair – and then turning around to become the world’s most famous, beard-stroking moralist.  It’s like a Michelin-starred chef opening a chain of kale-and-air smoothie stands.  The sheer, unadulterated audacity is something to behold.

He wrote with a scope that is, frankly, offensive to lesser mortals.  He wrote about everything: God, death, love, war, farming, family dysfunction, the subtle agony of a high-society dinner party – it’s all in there.  His sentences can be these long, winding , multi-clausal bastards that wrap around you like an anaconda, squeezing the air from your lungs until you finally reach the full stop, gasping, but somehow enlightened.  He’d spend twenty pages on a single battle, and you’d feel every cannonball, every terrified breath, every futile prayer.  Then he’d spend another ten on a girl’s conflicted feelings at her first ball, and you’d feel that, too, with surprising intensity.

So here’s to Leo.  Here’s to the man who gave us characters so real they feel like distant, dysfunctional relatives.  Here’s to the man whose magnum opus is both a literary masterpiece and the world’s most effective doorstop.  And here’s to the glorious, hypocritical, brilliant, maddening complexity of a writer who tried to renounce his own art because it was just too goddamn good.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m 73 pages into The Death of Ivan Ilyich and I’m already feeling the cold hand of existential dread on my shoulder.  Time to find some whiskey.  Tolstoy would have wanted it that way.  Probably.

N.P.: “Back in Black” – Doctorfunk

September 8, 2025

 

Well, well, well, dear reader, it’s Monday again, that cruel, coffee-sucking beast that lurches into our lives like a hungover, ‘roided out bouncer at a dive bar.  And here I am, your battle-scarred scribe, fresh off a nine-day bender of a writing marathon – call it a full-throttle, no-brakes assault on this sprawling, hydra-headed bastard of manuscript I’ve been wrestling like some demonic rodeo bull.

The mission was simple, or so I thought: take this shaggy, half-feral draft of a book – my latest attempt to claw some truth out of the chaotic void – and beat it into something resembling coherence.  Nine days of caffeine-fueled, sleep-deprived madness, hammering the keys until my fingers ached like the keys had been hammering back.  And the verdict?  Victory, of a sort.

There’s a draft now, a real, tangible beast, rough as a three-day bender and twice as messy, but it exists, goddamn it, in the digital ether.  An exceedingly rough draft, for my taste, with all the structural integrity of a sandcastle in a shitstorm.  But here’s the bright side, the one big, beautiful, undeniable fact I’m clinging to like a drunk to a lamppost: it’s good.  It’s not the polished diamond it needs to be before I put it out, but the fundamental shape of it, the raw architecture, is the best it has ever been.  So I’ll take it.  I will snatch that win from the jaws of chaos and hold it aloft, even as the to-do list stretches on into what feels like infinity.

One of the biggest successes of the week came from me experimenting with the chapter order.  This has been bugging me a long time.  I tried arranging them thematically, which, while common in memoirs, failed as badly as I thought it would here.  I tried arranging things purely chronologically, but that didn’t work either.  Ultimately, I had it arranged the way it’s supposed to be.  It jumps all over hell, timewise, but there’s no other way to tell it.

Of course, because the universe is a sadistic prick with a twisted sense of humor, nothing in this adult world of ours ever goes down smoothly.  The last week was a parade of distractions, obligations, and cosmic middle fingers – everything from Wi-Fi betrayals to existential crises that hit like a liver kick.  So, yeah, I didn’t check every box on my grandiose and erumpent to-do list.  The dream was to emerge from this nine-day gauntlet with a draft so tight it could swagger into a publisher’s office and demand a corner suite.  Reality, as always, has other plans.  But I’m not flogging myself too hard over it.  Perfection’s a myth, a siren song for suckers, and I’d rather have a flawed, fighting draft than a pristine fantasy that never leaves the page.

So here we are, Monday night, the world still spinning, the book still breathing.  I’m battered but unbowed, ready to dive back into the fray with a sharper blade and a meaner grin.  Stay tuned, sexy reader – you’re riding shotgun on this weird ride, and I promise you, it’s gonna be one hell of a show.

N.P.:  “Tron Ares – As Alive As You Need Me To Be – Metal Version” – Artificial Fear

Word of the Day: limerence

 

 

Today’s Word of the Day is limerence.  It’s a noun meaning a state of mind resulting from romantic or obsessive infatuation with someone, typically involving an intense emotional longing and a near-constant preoccupation with the object of one’s affection.  Think of it as love’s unhinged, over-caffeinated cousin who shows up uninvited and refuses to leave.

Coined in the 1970s by psychologist Dorothy Tennov, the word “limerence” has no clear linguistic ancestry, which feels appropriate for a term describing something so primal and chaotic.  It’s a Frankenstein of a word, stitched together to name the electric storm of dopamine and delusion that hijacks your brain when you’re smitten beyond reason.

Let me confess something, dear reader, because I believe in transparency, even when it’s messy and embarrassing: I am in full-blown, unapologetic hetero limerence with Taylor Sheridan.
This isn’t some casual admiration or polite nod of respect for a fellow creative.  No, this is the kind of obsessive, all-consuming fixation that makes you questions your own sanity.  It’s the kind of thing that has you Googling “Taylor Sheridan ranch photos” at 2 a.m. while your whiskey glass sweats on the nightstand.
It all started innocently enough, as these things often do.  I watched Sicario several years back, and it hit me like a tactical strike to the soul.  The tension, the moral ambiguity, the sheer audacity of the storytelling – it was like someone had cracked open my skull, scooped out my cinematic preferences, and weaponized them into a film.  I was hooked, but I didn’t yet know the name of my dealer.
Fast forward a few years, and I stumble across Hell or High Water.  Same reaction: instant love, like a shotgun blast to the chest.  But again, I didn’t connect the dots.  It wasn’t until earlier this year, after a rewatch of Sicario 2: Day of the Soldado (a sequel that, against all odds, doesn’t suck), that I finally decided to investigate.  Who was this mad genius behind these films?  Who was the puppet master pulling the strings on my cinematic emotions?
Enter Taylor Sheridan.
What I discovered sent me spiraling deeper into the rabbit hole.  This man isn’t just a screenwriter; he’s a goddamn force of nature.  A cowboy-poet with a $200 million deal at Paramount and a ranch the size of a small European country.  He’s not some Ivy League dilettante who lucked into Hollywood success.  Nope, he’s the real deal – a Fort Worth native who grew up wrangling cattle and probably knows how to castrate a bull without breaking a sweat.
It was his prolificity that rocked me.  The man churns out scripts and shows like he’s got a direct line to the Muses.  Yellowstone, 1883, 1923, Mayor of Kingstown, Tulsa King, Landman, Lioness – it’s like he’s single-handedly trying to keep the Western genre alive while the rest of Hollywood churns out shitty superhero sludge.
Here at the Safe House, we’ve been on a steady diet of Sheridan’s work all summer.  It’s become a ritual…after my day’s writing is done: whiskey, popcorn, and whatever new frontier of moral complexity he’s decided to explore.  And now, as we count the days to the second season of Landman, I find myself in a state of feverish anticipation.
Here’s the thing about limerence: it’s not rational.  It doesn’t care about logic or moderation.  It’s a wildfire, and Taylor Sheridan is the spark that has set my brain ablaze once again.  So here I am, a grown-ass adult, confessing my borderline-embarrassing obsession with a man I’ve never met but feel like I know well through his work.  For those of you who’ve been following me for a while, you know that a common complaint over the last several years has been that most of the artists I used to get inspiration and energy from are dead, and that things just aren’t the same now that, say Prince is gone.  I used to get a lot of energy from knowing that whatever I was doing, Prince was out there at the same moment creating brilliant art, and if he was staying up late working, then I needed to too.  The artists I’m referring to were like bright lights on the distant horizon, but gradually, those lights went out.  But now I’ve got Taylor.  We’re completely different writers, with completely different agendas and styles, but he is a welcome inspiration.  You may have noticed my output increasing significantly in the last six months or so, and this has a lot to do with that.  For the first time in a long time, there’s a writer I’ve never met who I’d love to go on a whiskey bender with, who’s badass enough to actually keep up.  And now I find out dude has his own brand: Four Sixes Whiskey!
It’s official…I want to be Taylor Sheridan when I grow up. 

N.P.: “Tide & Timber” – Edries Br

September 6, 2025

 

Alright, strap in, dear reader, because we’re about to tear into the quivering, gelatinous underbelly of one very vaginal Malcolm Gladwell, the pop-sociology huckster who’s been peddling his slick, airport-bookstore pablum to the gullible masses for far too long.  This week, the man who made a career out of repackaging obvious truths as revelatory “tipping points” has finally shown his true colors, and they’re a repulsive hue of pusillanimity.  On a podcast – The Real Science of Sport, no less – Gladwell admitted he was “cowed” into supporting the absurd notion that men, by some perverse alchemy of ideology, can compete as women in sports.  Cowed.  Like a fucking farm animal.

Let that sink in.  Let the full, wretched, and frankly hilarious implications of that statement marinate in the primordial ooze of your consciousness.  This is a man who built a career on explaining the hidden mechanics of everything from ketchup to success, the guru who supposedly sees the intricate threads connecting outliers and dogwalkers and Jamaican sprinters.  Yet, when faced with a cultural blitzkrieg demanding he assent to a proposition as biologically sound as a flat earth, he tucked his pathetic tail so far between his legs it was tickling his famously frizzy chin.

He was bullied.  Intimidated.  Pressured into nodding along with a fantasy so complete, so utterly detached from observable reality, that a reasonably bright toddler could debunk it with a crayon and a rudimentary understanding of anatomy.  The alleged intellectual heavyweight, the celebrated thinker, apparently possesses a spine with the structural integrity of warm Jell-O.  He saw the mob, torches aflame and pronouns sharpened, and decided that the path of least resistance was to simply shut his mouth and pretend the emperor’s new genitalia, were, in fact, stunning and brave.  Now he’s backtracking, natch, whining that he’s “ashamed” of his silence at a 2022 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference where he played moderator to a panel stacked with trans activists.  Apparently, he sat there, nodding a long like a bobblehead, while some tranny athlete turned to panelist Ross Tucker and demanded, “You have to let us win.”  Imagine it, dear reader: a grown-ass man, a supposed intellectual, heard that bald-faced lunacy and didn’t say a fucking word.  Didn’t push back.  Didn’t call out the absurdity of a man demanding a free pass to dominate women’s sports.  Instead, he played the good little progressive, keeping his mouth shut because…why?  Fear of the Twitter mob?  Worried he’d lose his invite to the next Davos circle-jerk?  Whatever the reason, he admits he was “dishonest,” letting “howlers” pass without comment, all because he was too spineless to speak the truth he claims he believed along: that males have no place competing in female sports categories.

Boo-fucking-hoo, Malcolm.  This isn’t about tipping points or the 10,000-hour rule.  This is about a complete and utter abdication of the one thing a writer – a thinker – is supposed to have: courage.  The courage to look at a thing, a real thing, and describe it as it is, not as a screeching mob of idiots on social media demands it be described.
It occurs to me now that my dear reader may not know much, or anything at all, about our boy Malcolm.  So, for those of you who’ve been too busy actually reading something worth a shit to notice his rise to fame, Gladwell, a Canadian scribbler with a mop of hair that screams “I’m trying too hard to be quirky,” burst onto the scene with The Tipping Point (2000), a book that took the radical stance that – get this – ideas spread like viruses.  Wow.  How groundbreaking.  He followed it up with Blink (2005), where he told us trusting your gut is sometimes a thing, and Outliers (2008), where he “discovered” that success involves hard work and luck.  No shit.  The guy’s built an empire on stating the obvious with just enough jargon to make middle managers feel like they’re reading Foucault.  A staff writer for The New Yorker and a podcast darling, he’s been coasting on this faux-intellectual schtick for decades, wrapping commonsense observations in a veneer of statistical razzle-dazzle that collapses under scrutiny faster than a house of cards in a hurricane.  His work is the literary equivalent of a Ted Talk: flashy, shallow, and designed to make you feel smarter without actually challenging what you think.

This isn’t just a lapse in judgment; it’s a betrayal of reason itself.  We’re talking about a guy who’s made millions pontificating on human behavior, yet when push came to shove, he folded like a cheap lawn chair under the weight of ideological bullying.  Again, a five-year-old with a basic grasp of biology knows that boys are not and can never be girls, that men’s bodies – packed with testosterone, denser bones, and more muscle mass – give them a physical edge in sports that no amount of “identity” can erase.  This isn’t rocket science; it’s not even high school biology.  It’s the kind of truth so glaringly obvious it’s embarrassing to have to articulate it.  Yet Gladwell, this self-styled guru of insight, claims he was “cowed” into silence.  The man’s 62 years old, an alleged literary heavyweight with a platform bigger than most, and he’s whimpering about being bullied into silence?  Pathetic.

This confession doesn’t just torch his credibility; it proves he never had any to begin with.  A writer – a real writer – doesn’t just regurgitate trendy narratives or cower before the zeitgeist.  A real writer wields his pen like a machete, cutting through bullshit to get to the truth, no matter who’s screaming what.  Gladwell’s admission reveals him as a fraud, a man so desperate to stay in the good graces of the cultural elite and their luxury beliefs that he’d rather lie than stand up for what he claims to believe.  And now he’s “ashamed”?  Fuck you.  This isn’t shame; it’s damage control.  He’s seen the wind shifting – people like Riley Gaines and Amy Hamm calling him out on X for his flip-flopping – and he’s scrambling to save face.  Too late, jackass.  You’ve shown your hand, and it’s pitiful.

The kicker here is that he’s not even apologizing for the right reasons.  He’s not sorry for propping up a narrative that undermines fairness in women’s sports or for gaslighting female athletes who’ve been forced to compete against deluded males.  Nope.  He’s sorry he didn’t speak up, sorry he got caught looking like an absolute coward.  It’s the intellectual equivalent of a politician saying, “I regret if anyone was offended.”  Weak sauce, Malcolm.  If you’re going to take a stand now, at least have the balls to own the harm your silence caused.  Female athletes have been cheated out of opportunities, podiums, and scholarships because of this nonsense, and you sat there, complicit, while it happened.

What is the value of a mind that can be so easily herded?  What are we to make of his entire body of work now, knowing that the author’s primary operating principle isn’t intellectual curiosity, but a deep-seated fear of being yelled at?

His books now read like artifacts from a different, more chickenshit dimension.  Blink becomes the story of a man who makes a snap judgement to save his own skin.  Outliers seems less a study of success and more a roadmap for conforming to the prevailing groupthink to avoid ostracism.  This confession re-contextualizes everything.  It reveals the man behind the curtain is not a wizard, but just a very nervous publicist with a good haircut, frantically pulling levers to maintain an illusion.

So he feels bad about it now.  He’s seen the tide turn just enough that he can peek his head out of his Canadian foxhole and whisper, “Um, for the record, I was a scared little bitch.”  Fine.  Good for him.  But absolution is not on the menu.  You don’t get a cookie for admitting you abandoned your post when the shooting started.  You get contempt.  You get whatever is beneath contempt.  You get the acidic, burning realization that the people we were told were our intellectual navigators were just reading from a script handed to them by the most aggressive and least coherent people in the room.

So where does this leave Gladwell’s legacy?  In the fucking toilet, that’s where.  If he was ever a legitimate writer – and that’s a massive “if,” given his track record of repackaging platitudes as profundity – this episode proves he’s nothing more than a brainless weather vane, spinning whichever way the cultural winds blow.  A real writer doesn’t need to be bullied into believing bullshit; they call it out, loud and proud, even when it’s inconvenient.  Gladwell’s spent his career dodging hard truths in favor of palatable narratives, and this latest fiasco is just the cherry on top of a career built on intellectual cowardice.  He’s not a thinker; he’s a performer, a snake-oil salesman who’s finally be caught with his pants down.

To the readers still clutching their dog-eared copies of Blink: wake up.  Your boy Malcolm’s been exposed as a fraud who’d rather kowtow to ideologues than stand up for what’s right.  And to Gladwell himself: next time you’re tempted to play the objective observer, do us all a favor and keep your lying mouth shut.  Or better yet, try to retrieve your testicles out of whatever tranny’s purse you left them in and say what you mean.  Until then, you’re just another chickenshit hack, cowed by the mob and unworthy of the page.

The whole pathetic spectacle leaves a taste in your mouth like cheap gin and cowardice.  The man was never a danger, never a threat to the established order.  He was its court jester, its high-gloss flatterer.  And then the court demanded he believe that two plus two equals fish, he didn’t even have the balls to argue.  He just asked what kind of fish.

N.P.: “God’s Gonna Cut You Down (feat. Adoration Destroyed)” – Dead Animal Assembly Plant

Word of the Day: Xanthippe

Today’s Word of the Day is Xanthippe.  It’s a noun meaning a shrewish, ill-tempered woman; a scold whose tongue cuts like my switchblade through butter.  Named after Socrates’ wife, reputedly a harpy of such mythic proportions she could make a philosopher question existence itself.

Derived from the Greek Xanthippe (Ξανθίππη), the name of Socrates’ spouse, whose alleged nagging became the stuff of ancient Athenian gossip.  First used in English around the 16th century to denote a woman whose vitriol could curdle wine.  From xanthos (yellow, fair-haired) and hippos (horse), though the etymological irony of “fair horse” for a termagant is a linguistic middle finger to decorum.  It’s either a weird flex or a sick burn, depending on how you look at it.

So there I am, three whiskeys deep into a Wednesday dusk, my typewriter humming like a junkyard Pontiac, when the air splits with the bellow of my neighbor, Brianna (we call her Big Brian), a “woman” built like a linebacker with the charm of a hungover wolverine.  She’s pounding on my door, her meaty fists rattling the hinges, hollering about a late-night drum circle that got going with some friends just back from Burning Man and the “goddamn jungle cacophony” of my half-feral parrots.  I fling open the door, shirt unbuttoned, a Camel dangling from my lip, ready to parry her outrage with my own.
“Brianna,” I snarl, “you miserable twat!  Your complaints are unwelcome.  Go back under your bridge and wait for your prandial goat to wander by, you troll.”
She looms, her face a topographic map of rage, eyes glinting like the business end of a chrome-plated shotgun.
“You degenerate goddamn scribbler,” she roars, “your noise is peeling the paint off my walls!”
The parrots, sensing blood, screech their approval from the living room, a feathered Greek chorus egging us on.  What ensues is a verbal cage match, a linguistic demolition derby.  She accuses me of harboring “a zoo for lunatics”; I counter that her nighty outdoor showers after swimming in her pool are traumatizing the local wildlife.  Her jowls quiver, her voice a foghorn of indignation, and I’m half-convinced she’s about to bench-press me into the next county.  But I’m no wilting poet – I lean in, whiskey breath and all, and lob a  barb about her grotesque yard décor, specifically her stupid fucking lawn gnomes, those “creepy ceramic bastards” staring into my soul.  She gasps, clutching her imaginary pearls, and I know I’ve hit the mark.
Then, in a moment of pure, unscripted glory, she unleashes her inner Xanthippe.  “You think you’re clever, you booze-soaked word-monger?” she thunders, her voice a sonic boom that sends the parrots into a flapping panic.  I’ll have your lease revoked faster than you can misquote Kerouac!”  It’s magnificent, her fury a force of nature, like a hurricane with a perm and a grudge.
“Lease?  I
own this bitch!”  I cackle, salute her with my glass, and retreat to my typewriter, making a mental note to shit in their pool again the next time they leave town. 

N.P.: “One Way Or Anther” – Broken Peach

September 3, 2025

 

Greetings from the Dissolute Desk, dear reader – this is your captain speaking, though, let’s be honest, the term “captain” implies a level of control over this particular vessel that would make Ahab weep with envy.  Today is Hump Day, that blessed Wednesday phenomenon that sits like a literary critic at a poetry slam – uncomfortable, slightly drunk, and desperately trying to find meaning in the chaos.

Just a brief update today – and my brief, I mean the literary equivalent of what pharmaceutical companies call “brief” side effects, which somehow manage to include everything from mild nausea to spontaneous combustion – since I’m currently submerged in the proverbial full-court press on this goddamn book.  And yes, to the one dear reader who thinks I should cuss less, I said “goddamn” because sometimes the English language requires the theological weight of profanity to adequately capture the Sisyphean absurdity of the creative process.

You know how, as an adult, everything becomes a Byzantine maze of bureaucratic torment designed by someone who clearly never had to navigate said maze while suffering from the literary equivalent of erectile dysfunction?  That’s to say: the persistent, maddening, inability to get your metaphors up when you need them most?  So that’s going on, but still – and here’s where my inherent optimism battles my well-documented pessimism like two drunk philosophers arguing about the meaning of existence at 3 AM – progress is being made.

Meeting my goals today is a pretty big deal when it comes to getting a draft done by September 8, which looms before me like a literary deadline should: with all the warm, welcoming energy of a proctological examination performed by someone with exceptionally large hands and a questionable understanding of personal space.

But let’s talk about this Wednesday celebration business, shall we?  Because if there’s one thing I’ve learned in my years of professional literary  debauchery – and by professional, I mean I occasionally get paid for this madness, though not nearly enough to justify the liver damage – it’s that midweek celebrations require a certain philosophical commitment to the absurd.

Think of it, man: it’s 2:17 PM Wednesday afternoon.  You’re three cups deep into what your local coffee shop optimistically calls their “house blend” but which tastes suspiciously like it was filtered through a gym sock that’s seen better decades.  Your manuscript stares back at you from the computer screen with all the judgement of a disappointed parent who just discovered your college transcript.  The cursor blinks.  Blinks again.  Taunts you with its rhythmic insistence that something should be happening here, some magical alchemy of words and ideas that transforms the mundane suffering of existence into something approaching art.

And then – miracle of miracles – the worse come.  They’re okay words.  Not the kind of luminous prose that makes readers weep and critics genuflect.  But words nonetheless.  Honest, slightly deranged words that capture something essential about what it means to be a human being stumbling through the cosmic joke of modern life with nothing but caffeine, stubbornness, and an inexplicable faith that somehow, against all evidence to the contrary, this particular arrangement of sentences might matter.

The adult world, you see, operates on the principle that nothing should ever be simple, straightforward, or remotely pleasant.  Need to renew your driver’s license?  That’s be a three-hour odyssey through a government office that apparently hasn’t been updated since the Carter administration.  Want to submit a manuscript?  Here’s a 17-page submission guide that contradicts itself no fewer than 43 times and requires you to format your work in a font that doesn’t exist on any computer manufactured after 1987.

But writing – actual writing, the kind that matters – operates on different principles entirely.  It demands that you show up, day after day, to face the blank page with nothing but your wits and whatever chemical assistance you can legally obtain.  It requires a kind of courage that’s simultaneously heroic and utterly ridiculous, like charging into battle armed only with a thesaurus and a profound sense of existential dread.

So yes, dear reader, progress is being made.  Slow, painful, occasionally hallucinogenic progress, but progress nonetheless.  Each sentence wrested from the void feels like a small victory against the forces of entropy and editorial bitching.  Each paragraph that doesn’t make me want to delete everything and take up accounting represents another step closer to that September 8 deadline, which approaches with all the subtlety of a methamphetaminic rhinoceros.

And if that’s not worth celebrating on a Wednesday afternoon, then I clearly don’t understand the fundamental principles of either celebration or Wednesday, both of which seem increasingly arbitrary the longer I contemplate them.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I have a book to finish and a hump day to properly honor.  The words won’t write themselves, though fuck knows I’ve asked them nicely.

Transmission ends.  Resume your regularly scheduled existential crisis. 

From the Dissolute Desk, where the coffee’s strong, the deadlines are stronger, and the metaphors occasionally achieve escape velocity. 

N.P.: “Pissed Off and Mad About It” – Texas Hippie Coalition

Word of the Day: imprecation

 

Today’s Word of the Day is “imprecation.”  It’s a noun meaning “a spoken curse; an invocation of evil or misfortune upon someone; a profane oath or malediction hurled with the specific intent of summoning cosmic retribution upon one’s enemies, rivals, or that idiot who cut you off in traffic while you were already running late for your court-mandated anger management session.

From the Latin imprecatio, meaning “to invoke” or “to call down upon,” which itself derives from im- (upon) + precari (to pray).  Because apparently, even our ancestors understood that sometimes prayer needs a little…creative direction.  The word first slithered into English around the 15th century, presumably when people realized that simply muttering “darn” wasn’t quite cutting it anymore.

Picture this, dear reader: it’s Friday night, and in a move I can only blame on equal parts bourbon and catastrophic optimism, I invited Tasha – hot, terrifying, and probably allergic to commitment – back to my lair for a “home-cooked dinner.”  My definition of “home-cooked” being whatever hellish combination of fire and bad decisions I could wrangle from a Dudes Living Alone recipe blog. 

The kitchen was already a goddamn war zone.  I’d tried to wipe up yesterday’s ramen explosion with a sock.  The smoke detector hung in the corner like a pissed-off ex, daring me to make one wrong move.  On the stove: a pan of bananas foster that looked less like “dessert” and more like “evidence in an arson investigation.” 

So what do I do?  I pour twice as much rum into the pan “for flavor,” which we all know is culinary code for “to see God.”  I light the match, and an eruption of blue flames whooshes to the ceiling.  Within seconds, I have set fire not only to dessert by also to my decrepit linoleum, part of the curtains, and possibly the lower atmosphere. 

Tasha – credit where it’s due – doesn’t scream.  She doesn’t even flinch. She just watches, stone-faced, as my IKEA spatula melts into ’90s plastic goo and my dog (Beelzebub) bolts straight out of the dog-door at Mach 2.  The fire alarm is bellowing like Satan’s kazoo, and I’m slap-dancing at the flames with a wet Rolling Stone back issue, which is not both on fire and somehow stuck to my jeans. 

My neighbors are banging on the front door.  Beelzebub is barking somewhere in the alley, possibly summoning lesser demons.  Smoke fills the house like I’m auditioning for “Worst Hotboxer in America.”  And all I can do is unleash a spectacular torrent of imprecation at the universe, the smoke alarm, the goddamn bananas, and honestly, at myself – creative profanity so loud and sustained I’m pretty sure the Pope just renounced me by proxy. 

Tasha orders an Uber in three silent swipes without losing eye contact – bold power move, honestly – and walks out, stepping over my flaming vinyl copy of “Bat Out of Hell” like it’s another Tuesday.  I’m left shirtless, coughing, and considering whether calling the fire department or moving to Guam is less humiliating. 

Dinner was ultimately pizza.  The dog came home eventually, smelling like brimstone and judgment.  And every time I walk into that kitchen, the burn mark on the ceiling still spells out “Never Try.” 

N.P.: “We All Scream” – Five Alarm Funk

September 1, 2025

 

Happy September, dear reader.  Yo rent is due.


So picture this…September 1, 1952, and some editor at Life magazine is probably chain-smoking Lucky Strikes while wondering if they’ve just committed career suicide by dedicating an entire issue to what amounts to an extended fishing story.  I’m talking, of course, about Ernest Hemingway’s The Old Man and the Sea, a novella so deceptively simple it makes you wonder if maybe, just maybe,  you’ve been overthinking this whole literature thing your entire booze-addled existence.  Or maybe that’s just me.  Anyway, the editor mentioned above need not have worried, because the story’s success was absurd: five million copies.  In two days.  Two!  As if the entire American reader public suddenly developed an inexplicable craving for tales of Cuban fisherman wrestling with marlins the size of small automobiles.  Which, when you think about it, is exactly what happened, and isn’t that just the most ridiculous thing you’ve ever heard?

Now, I know what you’re thinking – because I’m thinking it too – what kind of masochistic genius does it take to craft a story that’s essentially one old guy versus one big fish and somehow make it feel like the entire human condition is hanging in the balance?  The answer, it turns out, involves the kind of narrative compression that would make a neutron star jealous, each sentence so dense with meaning it threatens to collapse into a literary black hole.

Santiago – our weathered protagonist who’s gone eighty-four days without catching so much as a sardine (which, let’s be honest, is the kind of professional dry spell that would drive most of us to day-drinking and career reconsideration) – embodies this magnificent futility that defines the human experience.  Here’s a man who knows, knows with the certainty of sunrise and hangovers, that he’s probably going to lose this battle.  The marlin is bigger, stronger, operates in its natural element while Santiago is basically a land mammal with delusions of aquatic grandeur.  And yet – and this is where Hemingway’s genius reaches levels of almost pornographic intensity – he fights anyway.

Because what else is there to do?  Surrender to the inevitable mediocrity of a fisherman who can’t catch fish?  Accept that maybe the universe is just one giant cosmic joke and we’re all the punchline?  Hell no.  Santiago straps himself to that boat and engages in what amounts to a three-day death match with a creature that represents everything he’ll never be – young, powerful, at home in the vast indifference of the sea.

The beauty of this whole setup – and by beauty I mean the kind of terrible beauty that makes you want to simultaneously laugh and cry and pour another drink – is how Hemingway strips away every unnecessary word, every flowery metaphor, every literary flourish that might distract from the essential brutality of the confrontation.  This is prose as sharp and unforgiving as a gaff hook, sentences that cut straight to the bone of meaning without bothering with the courtesy of anesthesia.

And the kicker?  Santiago wins and loses simultaneously.  He catches the goddamn fish – this magnificent beast that represents everything noble and wild and free in the world – only to watch the sharks reduce it to a skeleton during the long journey home.  Which is, of course, exactly what life does to all our grand ambitions and noble struggles.  We fight the good fight, we occasionally triumph, and then reality shows up like a pack of hungry sharks to remind us that victory is always temporary and defeat is the only universal constant.

But here’s what those five million readers understood, consciously or not, when they devoured this story faster than Americans consume processed cheese: Santiago’s defeat isn’t really a defeat at all.  It’s defiance.  It’s the middle finger raised to a universe that seems designed to crush the human spirit.  It’s the refusal to go gentle into that good night, even when you’re 84 years old and your hands are cramping and the sharks are circling and every rational part of your brain is screaming that this is madness.

When the formerly prestigious Pulitzer committee awarded Hemingway the prize in 1954, they weren’t just recognizing technical mastery – though God knows the technical mastery is there, every sentence calibrated with the precision of a Swiss chronometer.  They were acknowledging something deeper, more essential: the recognition that great literature isn’t about happy endings or moral clarity or the comfortable illusion that virtue is rewarded and evil punished.  Great literature is about the futility of human effort in the face of cosmic indifference, and finding beauty in that futility.

So today let’s raise a glass to Santiago and his marlin, to Hemingway and his impossible brevity, to the five million readers who recognized greatness when it slapped them across the face like a salty wave.  In a world that increasingly rewards mediocrity and celebrates participation trophies, The Old Man and the Sea stands as a monument to the idea that sometimes the most heroic thing you can do is fight a battle you know you’re going to lose.

Because in the end, isn’t that what we’re all doing anyway?

N.P.: “Sunglasses On At The Dollar Store” – Shockwire