Monthly Archives: July 2025

Review: The Greasy Strangler

The Greasy Strangler

Reviewed by Jayson Gallaway on 28 July 2025 .

3 out of 5

Watching The Greasy Strangler is like being locked in a sauna with a deranged performance artist who’s determined to make you laugh, cry, and question your life choices—all while slathered in a thick coat of Crisco. It’s not just a movie; it’s a goddamn endurance test.  It’s a test of your mental fortitude, your gag reflex, and your ability to embrace the truly bizarre. And in the weirdest ways, it might be a masterpiece.  It’s a 93-minute assault on your senses, your dignity, and your ability to keep a straight face while watching a grown man slather himself in Crisco and murder people, then step into an almost violent carwash whilst totally nude to clean up after the fact.  It’s like if John Waters and David Lynch decided to make a baby and then left that baby to be raised by Troma Entertainment.   And I’ve gotta say, I loved every ridiculous second of it.

The  plot, such that it is, kicks off with Big Ronnie and his son, Big Brayden, who live together in an awful suburban hovel, in their underwear, introduced as Disco Walking Tour guides who wear matching pink turtlenecks and show their customers local landmarks that were significant in the history of disco (these landmarks are all fictional, seemingly made up on the spot by Big Ronnie).  Big Ronnie and Big Brayden share an extremely unhealthy relationship, and an even unhealthier diet.  If the phrase “Would you like some grease with that?” ever needed a visual representation, this is it.

The oily affair begins when Big Ronnie, who has an unexplained proclivity for getting slicker than a used car salesman at a water park, claims to be the titular Greasy Strangler, to which Brayden responds by accusing his father of being a “bullshit artist.”  [Accusations of bullshit artistry are a recurring theme in this movie).  Ronnie goes from zero to greasy faster than you can say, “two thousand bottles of baby oil.”  After dousing himself in the oleaginous ooze, Ronnie strangles the life out of anyone unlucky enough to cross his slippery path.

At this point, it’s probably worth mentioning the soundtrack: it is weird as fuck, thus making it perfect for this movie.  The soundtrack was composed by Andrew Hung, a renowned British musician, and was released on October 7, 2016.  It is this reviewer’s opinion that Andrew Hung, however lovely a person he might be, should be shot in the balls for crimes against musicality.  That said, it must also be admitted that Andrew Hung has had vastly more success in composing music than the reviewer has, prompting the question, “What the fuck does Jayson know about soundtrack composition wince he hasn’t sold a single CD?”  Which is a perfectly reasonable question that I cannot reasonably answer.  But I’m the one writing this review and would gladly debate anybody about the nightmarish and perverse qualities of this soundtrack.

Some notable tracks from the soundtrack include, “Brightly Coloured Pills,” “Get on the Greasy,” Go Home to My Bed,” “Gulp!,” “You Didn’t List, Oh No,” and “Amulet.”

It’s worth noting that the LP edition was limited to 1000 copies.  It’s also worth noting that Andrew Hung’s compositions for the film have been praised by various musical perverts for their originality and fitting accompaniment to the film’s eccentric narrative.  And so much for that.  Now, back to the plot.

Quick cut to Big Ronnie and Brayden meeting up with the poor participants of their Disco Walking Tour.  Big Ronnie points to a random doorway claiming it was in this very doorway that the Bee Gees wrote the lyrics to “Night Fever.”  The walking tourists immediately get into a series of skeptical arguments about the veracity of Big Ronnie’s disco claims, and the absolute necessity of free drinks.

It’s this last bit that warrants further attention and, perhaps, deeper analysis: for my money, it might be the best scene in the movie.  The scene unfolds when one of the disco tourists, a man with a thick accent, repeatedly interrupts to demand the free drinks that were promised in the tour’s promotional material.  His insistence grows increasingly desperate, and the repetition of “Free drinks!  Free drinks!” quickly becomes a mantra of absurdity for the whole group.  Of course, in true Greasy Strangler fashion, the scene takes the mundane frustration of unmet expectations and cranks it up to eleven, turning it into a grotesque spectacle of awkwardness and absurdity.

Big Ronnie, naturally, responds with his trademark blend of disdain and delusion, dismissing the tourists’ complaints with the wave of his greasy hands.  The whole exchange is a masterclass in anti-humor, where the joke isn’t in the punchline but in the sheer, unrelenting weirdness of the situation.  And it makes me cackle.

Meanwhile, Big Brayden, the not-so-mini-me, falls for the bespectacled Janet, whose taste in men is as questionable as the food hygiene in the Ronnie household. And things just get weirder from there.

This far into the review, and I fear I’m not doing the in-depth analysis of this hour and a half of absurdity.  First, let’s dissect our greasy duo.  Big Ronnie is what you’d get if Colonel Sanders went on a bender with the Marquis de Sade at a lube factory.  The guy’s a walking heart attack, a grotesque lothario who thinks “seduction” involves grinding his hips and repeatedly whispering sweet nothings like “hootie tottie disco cutie.”  Big Brayden is pretty much Napoleon Dynamite got trapped in a vat of Vaseline.  He’s a man-child in the most literal sense, with an Oedipal complex that Freud would need a chainsaw to cut through.  Together, they’re like the Laurel and Hardy of sleaze – if Laurel and Hardy were prone to naked choke-outs and disco-drenched debauchery.

The performances are…well, they’re performances.  Michael St. Michaels as Big Ronnie is a revelation, a man so committed to his role that you can almost smell the grease through the screen.  Sky Elobar as Big Brayden is equally unhinged, delivering lines with the kind of deadpan sincerity that makes you wonder if he’s in on the joke or if he’s just as confused as the rest of us.  And then there’s Elizabeth De Razzo as Janet, the love interest caught in the middle of this greasy love triangle, who deserves some kind of award for keeping a straight face throughout her scenes.

Full disclosure, dear reader: I’ve seen this movie several times at this point.  Yesterday’s viewing was no less strange and bewildering than the first.  And ultimately, I really don’t know what to make of this thing.  The reptilian part of my brain wants to recoil in horror and label the whole thing as garbage.  But that would be dismissive.  One solid conclusion I’ve drawn from every viewing is that, say what you will about the movie, everything about it was deliberate.  Unlike movies like “The Room” and others where the writer/director had some grand, lofty vision of what they were going to make, and then, due to stark budgetary realities or just incompetent filmmaking, the result had little or nothing to do with the original vision, I get the feeling that The Greasy Strangler is pretty close to exactly what the filmmakers intended to create.  As weird as every single element of this movie is, it inarguably has a consistent aesthetic throughout.  And there’s no getting around the fact that I and pretty much everyone I know who has seen the movie has watched it repeatedly.

Of course, The Greasy Strangler is not for everyone.  It’s not even for most people.  It’s a movie that revels in its own weirdness, that dares you to look away and then punishes you for not doing so.  It’s gross, it’s offensive, it’s deeply, deeply stupid – and it’s also one of the funniest, most original movies I’ve ever seen.

So, if you’re the kind of person who enjoys a good cinematic trainwreck, who finds beauty in the grotesque, who laughs in the face of good taste and decency, this is the movie for you.  Just don’t watch it on a full stomach.  Or a first date.  Or with your parents.  Actually, just don’t watch it with anyone you respect, because they will never look at you the same way again.

World Premiere Word of the Day: juridiculous

 

I hope you’re wearing your tux or ball gown today, dear reader, for you have found your lucky self at a World Premiere!  Today, I’m thrilled to unveil a brand new word to the world.  Ladies and gentlemen…behold!  I give you juridiculous (adj).  This term, coined by yrs. truly, is an adjective used to describe decisions, rulings, or verdicts so absurd, farcical, or patently nonsensical that they defy logic, reason, and the basic tenets of justice.  These rulings often arise from the political weaponization of the law, grotesque incompetence, or a toxic cocktail of both.  The word captures the Kafkaesque comedy of errors that unfolds when the judicial system becomes a theater of the absurd.
A portmanteau of juridical (from the Latin juridicus, meaning “of or relating to judicial proceedings”) and ridiculous (from the Latin ridiculus, meaning “laughable, absurd”).  Together, they form a linguistic Molotov cocktail hurled at the crumbling edifice of legal sanity.

It started, as these things often do, with a parking ticket.  Not just any parking ticket, but one issued for the crime of “parking with intent to loiter.”  Let that sink in, dear reader.  The car wasn’t double-parked, wasn’t blocking a hydrant, wasn’t even idling.  It was just there, existing in a metered space, minding its own goddamn business.  But apparently, in the eyes of the law – or at least the bloodshot eyes of Officer McCheese of the FCPD (not his real name…I’ve had enough trouble with this badge-carrying ballbag already, so I’m not going to dox him here), who looked like he’d been mainlining Red Bull and rage since 1997 – this was an act of premeditated vehicular loitering.
So there I was, standing in front of Judge Phatphuck (also not his real name), a man whose face resembled a half-melted candle and whose judicial robe looked like it had been tailored by a blind mortician.  He peered down at me over his bifocals, the kind of glasses that scream, I’m about to ruin your day for sport.
“How do you plead to the charge of parking with intent to loiter?” he asked, his voice dripping with the kind of smugness that only comes from a lifetime of never being punched in the face.
“Your Honor,” I sad, “with all due disrespect, this charge is – how do I put this delicately? – batshit crazy.”
Phatphuck’s jowls quivered.  “Watch your language in my courtroom!”
“Watch your courtroom in my language,” I shot back, because sometimes you have to go down swinging.
The prosecutor, a woman who look like she’d been raised by a pack of sentient spreadsheets, stood up and began reciting some obscure municipal code about “intentional misuse of public space.”  She spoke with the kind of monotone that could make a TED Talk on time travel sound like a eulogy for a goldfish.
“Your Honor,” I interrupted sexily, “this is juridiculous.”
The courtroom fell silent.  Even the stenographer stopped typing, her fingers hovering over the keys like she was trying to decide whether to record my outburst or just quit her job and join a commune.
“Excuse me?” Phatphuck said, his voice rising an octave.
“Juridiculous,” I repeated.  “Adjective.  Describing a judicial decision so absurd, so laughably detached from reality, that it makes Kafka look like a realist.  Example: this entire bullshit proceeding.”
Phatphuck’s face turned the color of a boiled lobster.  “One more outburst like that, and I’ll hold you in contempt.
“Hold this in contempt, jackass.  I’ve been swimming in contempt since the moment I walked in here.  You think I’m scared of a little extra?”
Ultimately, I was fined $500, sentenced to 20 hours of community service, and banned from parking within 500 feet of a courthouse for the next year.  But you know what, dear reader?  It was worth it.  Because somewhere out there, in the vast and chaotic universe of human language, juridiculous now exists.
And if that’s not justice, I don’t know what is. 

N.P.: “In Hell I’ll Be In Good Company – Metal Version” – Leo

July 25, 2025

It’s Friday…can 80s icons quit dying?  Lord.

Speaking of death, today we’re pouring some out for Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who bought it on this day in 1834.  Mistah Coleridge, the man who practically invented “tortured genius,” finally got what must’ve felt like a merciful exit from this waking fever dream we call life.  And for you English majors keep literary score at home, yes, we’re talking about that Samuel Taylor Coleridge – the Romantic poet with the golden tongue and a bloodstream that, by the end, may have been roughly half laudanum.  He was the guy who gift-wrapped the English language two of its most intoxicating verses, “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” and “Kubla Khan,” and still managed to moonlight as a literary critic while spiraling into the kind of addiction that makes rock stars look like amateurs.

Now, if you’re not an English major and have been sleeping through every literature class since seventh grade – or, worse, you were “too cool” for the Romantics – allow me to explain who we’re dealing with.  Coleridge was one of the OG hyper-literate provocateurs of the late 18th and early 19th centuries, when England was waist-deep in boys with big brains, big egos, and bigger quills.  Alongside his bro-from-another-poetry-mother, Wordsworth, Coleridge kicked off the Romantic movement with their 1798 publication of Lyrical Ballads.  This book was basically the thing that brought high-minded poetic ambition and made it accessible by using the ballad form. Basically it threw out the belief that poetry had to be highbrow to count.

But here’s where it gets tricky because, while Wordsworth really leaned into the who pastoral perfection shtick, all rolling hills and sublime nature moments, Coleridge steered straight into the weird, the metaphysical, and occasionally the completely unhinged.  “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” is this long-as-hell, chaotic ocean hallucination featuring doomed sailors, a cursed bird, and a whole shitload of Christian allegory mixed with existential dread.  It is haunting and brilliant, but pretty nuts.

Then there’s “Kubla Khan,” a poem so drenched in drugs (okay, how about “narcotic overtones”?)  you almost feel high just reading it.  Supposedly thrown together during an actual opium haze and notoriously “unfinished” due to someone knocking on the door mid-writing session, it’s one of the most “psychedelic” works ever to be penned in the Queen’s English.  Xanadu, sacred rivers, pleasure domes…shit yes!  It’s basically what happens when a world-class poet falls face first into his medicine cabinet and gets a direct connection with the divine just before the signal goes dead.

Speaking of cabinets full of Illicit Substances, Coleridge’s dance with opium wasn’t a casual flirtation; it was a full-blown toxic relationship.  Toward the end of his life, the line between Coleridge the man and Coleridge the addict blurred into oblivion.  You’d think a poetic genius who wrote such ethereal bangers would just moonwalk into immortality with swagger.  But no.  He spent his later years riddled with debts, estranged from his acquaintances, and bunked up in a London pad called Highgate under his doctor’s quasi-supervision.

Coleridge was a mad genius.  He was hopelessly flawed but still managed to open our minds as to what poetry could do.  He was a bit of a pain in the ass.  When you owe money to everybody in town, but all you do is babble about convoluted metaphysics, it pisses people off.  But that he was able to create what he did out of his own personal chaos is something you can’t help but respect.

So tonight we pour some out for Uncle Sammy.  Genius, no matter how bruised or broken, doesn’t die quietly.  And he sure as hell didn’t either.

N.P.: “Sinner” – Robert Randolph

July 24, 2025

 

I’m gonna let you in on a bit of a secret, dear reader: my favorite book, my favorite story, ever, the one that has captured my psyche and imagination since the first time I heard it, at the age of six, is The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas.  The movie was going to be on TV back then, and my father seemed very interested in watching it (back then, nothing was on-demand: the three networks showed what they showed when they showed it, and if that didn’t work out with your schedule, tough shit – you didn’t get to see it.  My father, as I recall, had done a bit of schedule adjusting and planning to watch this movie).  Before it started, I asked him what it was about, and he told me: a young man is betrayed by his friends and acquaintances, even the woman he loves.  His friends conspire and lie and have the young man thrown in a gothic abomination of a prison for life for a crime he didn’t commit.  While he’s in prison, his father suffers greatly due to his son’s imprisonment and eventually dies from grief and poverty.  But then the young man escapes, finds a massive treasure, gets a new identity, and sets about taking his revenge on all those who betrayed him.  And that clicked so strongly in my head that I suspect my father actually heard the click.  I couldn’t imagine a more righteous fight: escaping from wrongful punishment and destroying those who were behind its infliction.

So then we watched the movie.  Back then, I thought most of what my father watched on TV (i.e., not cartoons) was boring.  Not that night.  That night I watched the entirety of the movie absolutely rapt.  I learned the young man’s name was Edmond Dantès, and he was my kindred spirit…or at least the first time I related to anyone, fictional or otherwise, in that way.  I also learned the best revenge is played in the long game.  It requires patience and unwavering will power to endure suffering and neglect.  I learned a lot of things that night…a surprising amount.  I didn’t know it at the time, but the experience of that story would be formative.  From that moment until right now as I’m sitting here typing this, revenge was, is,  and likely always will be my biggest motivator.  Seriously.  Fear not, dear reader…I’m aware of how problematic this is, and I have spent a great deal of time on various mental health professionals’ couches “dealing” with it.  For a while, on the advice and under the care of one such professional, I attempt to “let it go.”  All of it.  Quit viewing life as time to take out those on The List and spend my time in my head doing something else…feeling gratitude or some such hippie hooey.  I spent a couple years trying (I mean really trying) and failing (I mean really failing) to meditate.  Hell, I went to hypnotherapist about it.  Which was interesting, and those closest to me at the time noted that I was “a lot nicer,” but alas, it didn’t really take.  After a couple of awkward years, I said “fuck it” and went back to my vengeful ways.  It felt like coming home.  During a very uncomfortable time in my life, I was suddenly comforted.

Okay…gotta stop…all of this belongs in the book.  Besides, this isn’t supposed to be about me.  This is supposed to be about the birthday boy…the author of my favorite book.

Alexandre Dumas was born on this day in 1802, and if there’s any justice in the afterworld, the man is somewhere today picking sword fights with angels and uncorking bottles of celestial champagne.  He was larger than this messy, meat-grinding life – an unapologetic tornado of appetite, ambition, and literary brilliance.  This was the guy who gave us not only The Count of Monte Cristo, but also the more popular The Three Musketeers, which is, while I was diving into the story of the Count, what the other kids in my class were into.  He wrote about six jillion other tales of intrigue, betrayal, and swagger-dripping heroism.

But here’s the thing.  Among all his triumphs – and there are many – it’s The Count that sits at the top of the mountain, an exquisite cocktail of vengeance service ice-cold and spiked with the kind of high-stakes drama most writers can only fantasize about.  Reading it (for me) is like stepping onto a battlefield armed with rage, cunning, and a self-righteous thirst that could flatten nations.  And yet, my one complaint – with zero apology – is that Edmond Dantès, the Count himself, wimps out at the finish line.  Forgiveness?  Redemption?  Goddammit, no!  No, no, no.  Not in this house.

I am, as usual, almost completely alone in my opinion, here.  The Count of Monte Cristo is a supposed to be a redemption story, the redemption happening when Edmond/The Count realizes that his quest for revenge, which is a thing of absolutely beauty in my book, has consumed him and caused suffering to others (well, yeah!  Why else embark on a quest for revenge?) including “innocent” people (in my world this is known as “collateral damage”).  If you want to make an omelet, you’ve got to break some eggs.  But the Count suddenly seems to misplace his balls somewhere and decides to forgive his enemies and let go of his hatred.  Apparently the Count is capable of this, and good for him, I guess.  But this part of the story, when he just goes soft and starts listening to Taylor Swift and watching Disney content, is always a crushing disappointment for yrs. truly.

Here…allow me to elaborate a tad.  Imagine being Dantès.  Twenty-something, engaged to a beautiful woman, on the verge of your life’s dream, and then BAM!  A Machiavellian screwjob of the highest order.  Then you’re framed for treason, locked away in some wretched dungeon while your enemies profit from your ruin.  One guy marries your fiancée, for chrissakes!  Another climbs the career ladder using your blood as rungs.  But then, you escape!  Against all odds, you claw your way back into the land of the living, armed with a new name, a pile of Fuck You money and Titanic-level resources, and one singular purpose: make everyone who destroyed you pay.

For most of the book, Dantès embodies vengeance in its purest, most operatic form.  A chess master orchestrating ruin with surgical precision.  Poisonings, psychological warfare, financial annihilation – his betrayers are crushed one by one beneath the weight of their own sins, which he amplifies like some vengeful, God-tier conductor.  It’s satisfying in that primal, blood-thirsty way that it seems humanity doesn’t really like to admit.  This is revenge as art.

But then.  Then.  After something like 1400 glorious pages of well-earned savagery, Dantès does the unthinkable – he gets soft.  He fucking forgives.  He decides vengeance has consumed too much of his soul or whatever philosophical drivel we’re meant to accept as closure.  Sure, maybe that makes him a “better person,” but some of us don’t read The Count of Monte Cristo for moral improvement.  Some of us want to see these backstabbing weasels buried six feet under with nothing but ruinous regret to keep them company.  Redemption is Disneyesque, kindergarten nonsense.  I want scorched earth.  Blood.  I want heads on spikes.

Which isn’t to say that the book is anything less than one of the greatest novels ever written.  I just rewrite the last chapters in my head every time I finish it – and in my version, no one crawls out unscathed.  Danglars doesn’t get to slink off after losing his fortune.  Fernand doesn’t bite his own bullet just because he happens to feel bad at the end.  No.  They all go down.  Every.  Single.  One.  That’s the ending I celebrate.

Still, Dumas, even at his softest, deserves nothing but awe.  The man was a magician, telling timeless stories while also bedding half of Europe and shaking hands with history itself.  (The guy once fought a duel once over a nasty theater review.)

So here’s to you, Monsieur Dumas.  Your words have outlived you by centuries, and your spirit will linger long after we’re all dust.  Raising a glass in your honor, and maybe, just maybe, plotting a hypothetical alternate Dantès ending where nobody gets forgiven and every wrong is avenged tenfold.  Cheers to a legend.

N.P.: “That Death Cannot Touch” – The Black Queen

July 21, 2025

Seems like the last week or so has been a busy week or big-name literary births and deaths and such, does it not, dear reader?  Maybe it’s just me.  But the proverbial hits, as they say, just keep on coming.  Today, July 21, we hoist our glasses, sloshing with the good stuff (with the good stuff today being defined as a big fuck-off bottle of Dark Hedges Irish Whiskey…I’m about to find out how good it is), to the indomitable, beard-shadowed colossus of America letters, Ernest Hemingway, born this day in 1899.  The man carved his stories from the raw meat of existence, bloodied his knuckles on the world, and left us prose so lean it could cut glass.

I felt that paragraph deserve a snort of Whiskey…first impressions: burns a bit…a little raspy going down.  But it will clearly get the job done.  So now please join me, dear reader: pour one out, preferably something that burns going down, and let’s get to it.

Hemingway was a one-man war zone, a walking manifesto of grit and gusto.  Born in Oak Park, Illinois, he didn’t waste time sipping tea with the bourgeoisie.  By 17, he was banging out copy for the Kansas City Star, learning to strip sentences to their bones – short, sharp, true.  That style, that relentless economy of words, became his machete, hacking through the jungle of horseshit that passes for literature.  To wit:

  • The Sun Also Rises – More of a bullfight than a book, all blood and dust and broken hearts in Pamplona.  This 1926 novel follows Jake Barnes, a war-wounded expat journalist nursing a literal and figurative impotence, as he drifts through the booze-soaked cafés of Paris and the sun-scorched fiestas of Spain.  He’s tangled up with Lady Brett Ashley, a magnetic, reckless beauty who loves him but can’t stay faithful, and a crew of disillusioned drifters – lost souls of the Lost Generation.  They drink, they bitch at each other, they chase bullfights and heartbreak, all while grappling with the emptiness of a world that’s been shot to hell.  It’s a story about longing you can’t satisfy, purpose you can’t find, and the cruel grace of just keeping on.  Hemingway’s sparse prose makes every glance, every drink, every bull’s charge feel like a wound you didn’t see coming.  [A second slug of the Dark Hedges…burns less than the first one, which is usually how these things go.  Less of a shock to the system.]
  • A Farewell to Arms – A love story that kicks you in the teeth and leaves you gasping.  Set against the chaotic Italian front of World War I, it’s the tale of Frederic Henry, an American ambulance driver who falls hard for Catherine Barkley, a British nurse with a past as haunted as the war-torn landscape.  Their romance is desperate, all-in, a fleeting sanctuary amid the mud, blood, and betrayal of war.  Of course, Hemingway doesn’t do bullshitty fairy tales – love gets battered by shellfire, bureaucracy, and fate’s cold indifference.  When the couple flees to Switzerland, the story’s liver-kick of an ending reminds you that life doesn’t owe you a happy ending, just the strength to face the wreckage.
  • For Whom the Bell Tolls – Robert Jordan, a Montana dynamiter, joins a gang of Spanish guerrillas fighting Franco’s fascists in the Civil War.  His mission is to blow a bridge to stop the enemy’s advance.  Over four days, he grapples with love (enter Maria, a survivor with fire in her eyes), loyalty, and the ticking clock of mortality.  The title, cribbed from John Donne, says it all: no man’s an island, and every death chips away at us all.

But let us not, as you might in some other lit classes, get lost in the canon.  Hemingway’s life was the real novel – louder, messier, and more alive than any page could hold.  The man drove ambulances in World War I, got himself blown up and still crawled back for more.  He hunted big game in Africa, fished marlin that could swallow your ego whole, and boxed like he was settling scores with God.  He drank like a pirate, caroused in Parisian cafés, and turned Key West into his personal fiefdom of whiskey and words.  He did time in Cuba, slinging daiquiris and stories with equal swagger.  He jumped into Spain’s Civil War, dodging bullets and scribbling almost surreal dispatches.  And yeah, the man had flaws – big, jagged ones.  He could be a prick, a chauvinist, a violent storm of ego and insecurity.  But what writer isn’t at some (or most) points?  Four wives, countless feuds, and a temper that could torch a room.  But so what?  Who wants a saint?  Saints don’t stare into the abyss and come back with The Old Man and the Sea.  That book, that lone fisherman battling the ocean’s wrath, is Hemingway distilled – stubborn, solitary, and unyielding, even when the sharks come circling.

Gen Zers tend not to get it.  They tend to stare with stunning jadedness and mumble something about how “the world has changed.”  We’re drowning in tweets and memes, and Papa’s iceberg theory, where seven-eighths of the story lurks beneath the surface, feels like a relic.  But fuck them.  Hemingway’s still relevant, still dangerous.  In a world fat and bloated with hot takes and clickbait, his clarity is a switchblade.  And his life is a reminder to live hard, love fiercely, and write like your heart’s on fire, even if it leaves you scarred.

So here’s to you, Ernest…on your 126th birthday, we’re raising a glass of Dark Hedges, no ice, no apologies.  Happy birthday, Papa.  Keep swinging in the great barroom brawl of eternity.

Now, dear reader – go read A Moveable Feast, chase it with a shot of absinthe, and write something that’d make Hemingway nod from the great beyond.  Or at least spill some booze in his honor.  Cheers.

N.P.: “Bottle With Your Name On It” – Thomas Rhett

July 20, 2025 – Raising a Glass to Cormac McCarthy: A Birthday Rant on the Dark Prophet of American Letters

Well, hell, dear reader…it’s July 20, and the ghost of Cormac McCarthy’s birthday is rattling its chains, demanding a toast.  Cormac was, for my money, one of the two greatest novelists of my time (the other is Don DeLillo, who is still, thankfully, very much alive).  But today is for the late Mr. McCarthy.
Born in 1933, the old bastard would’ve been 92 today, probably still squinting into the void, penning sentences sharp enough to flay your soul.  He’s gone now – kicked the bucket on June 13, 2023, leaving us poorer for it – but his words still very much burn like cheap whiskey on a busted lip.  So here I am, half-cocked on desk whiskey and deep reverence, to sling some ink about the three McCarthy novels that have and shall always claw at my guts in the best way: No Country for Old Men, Child of God, and The Road.  If you haven’t read them, stop what you’re doing, light a cigarette (even if you don’t smoke), and prepare to have your soul dragged through the dirt.  Reading any of these three books is basically a bar fight with the abyss.  For you Gen Z creatures of comfort who can’t be bothered to crack an actual book, all three of these books were made into very respectable movies, so have at it.

First up, No Country for Old Men.  This is McCarthy at his most nihilistic, which is saying something.  It’s a story about a big bag of money, a psychopathic hitman, and the kind of moral decay that makes you want to shower in bleach.  This thing is philosophical meat grinder, a West Texas bloodbath where fate’s got a coin toss and a cattle gun.  Llewelyn Moss stumbles on a drug deal gone sour, snags a satchel of cash, and sets off a chase that’s less cat-and-mouse and more buzzard-and-corpse.  Anton Chigurh (that name alone is a blade in the dark) stalks the pages like death’s own CPA, balancing the books with a silencer. Javier Bardem’s portrayal of Anton in the movie version of the story has been called, correctly, the most accurate and realistic portrayal of a psychopath on the big screen.  The movie is one of my favorites, but the book is where it’s really at.  McCarthy’s prose is leaner than a starved coyote, every sentence a bullet.  The dialogue crackles, sparse but heavy, like men muttering over a campfire before the world ends.  It’s about chance and fate, sure, but also about how the old codes – honor, grit, whatever – get chewed up by a new kind of evil that doesn’t negotiate.  Reading it makes one want to punch a wall, then cry into one’s drink.  It’s that kind of book.

Then there’s Child of God, which is basically McCarthy saying, “Oh, you thought No Country was dark?  Hold my beer.”  Lester Ballard is a character so twisted, so utterly devoid of redemption, that you almost feel bad for him – until you remember he’s a necrophiliac living in a cave.  Yes, our boy Lester is a depraved little gremlin, a Tennessee hillbilly gone feral, humping corpses and scuttling through caves like some reject from God’s assembly line.  You shouldn’t like him, but McCarthy makes you stare, makes you see the humanity in a monster – because, hell, most of us are just one bad day from digging graves for company.  The prose here is raw, almost biblical, painting a world so bleak you can smell the rot.  It’s short, too, like a shot of rotgut that burns going down and leaves you queasy.  I love it for its nerve, for how it dares you to look away and knows you won’t.  McCarthy doesn’t flinch, and neither should you.

And finally, The Road.  Sweet, merciless Road.  This is the book that makes you want to hug your kids, stockpile canned goods, and never, ever take a sunny day for granted.  This one’s a sledgehammer to the heart.  A father and son trudging through a world scorched to ash, where hope’s a memory and cannibals are the neighbors.  It’s apocalypse stripped to the bone – no zombies, no sci-fi bullshit, just survival and love in a place that doesn’t give a shit.  The father’s cough, the boy’s questions, the way they carry “the fire” – it’s all so fragile you want to scream.  McCarthy’s style here is stark, almost poetic.  I read it when I’m feeling too cocky, when I start to mistakenly think the world’s got my back.  It humbles you, makes you want to hug your kids or your dog or hell, even a stranger, just to feel something warm.  It’s a love letter to what’s left after everything’s gone.

McCarthy’s dead now, and the world feels thinner without him.  He wrote like he was carving epitaphs, each one daring you to face the dark and keep walking.  So today, I’m pouring some out for Cormac, that grim old poet of blood and dust.  Happy birthday, you magnificent bastard.  May your shade find a barstool in whatever dive serves the afterlife’s best whiskey.  Here’s to No Country, Child of God, and The Road – three shots of truth that hit far harder than a hangover.  Cheers, and rest in chaos.

N.P.: “Up Jumped the Devil” – David & the Devil

Word of the Day: scrofulous

Happy Saturday, dearest reader.  It’s time to sling some lexical filth into your booze-addled brains.  Today’s word is scrofulous, a term so gloriously grotesque it could make a vulture gag on its own carrion.  Let’s tear into it in our usual style: like a pack of rabid jackals on a three-day bender.

  1. Of, relating to, or affected with scrofula, that old-timey tuberculous nightmare where your lymph nodes swell up like rotten fruit.
  2. Having a diseased, run-down appearance, like you’ve been living in a dumpster behind a dive bar.
  3. Morally contaminated, the kind of soul-rot that makes you want to shower with whiskey and self-loathing.

This gem slinks from the Middle English scrofules, rooted in the Latin scrofulae, meaning “swellings” or “little sows” (because those neck lumps looked like piglets to some medieval quack).  It’s tied to scrofa, Latin for “sow,” which is fitting, given the word’s grubby, wallowing vibe.  It’s like the linguistic gods knew it would one day describe the kind of people who drink boxed wine straight from the spout.  By the 15th century, it was slathered onto anything diseased or morally bankrupt, and it’s been festering in the language ever since.

The bar was a pulsating boil of humanity, smelling like sweat, stale beer, and urinal cakes.  I was  being my usual amazing self, three whiskeys deep, my notebook splayed open like a gutted fish, when this really ratty bastard, I mean we’re talking scrofulous, staggered in – face like a roadmap of shitty decisions, eyes like piss-holes in the snow, his soul so rank you could smell the moral decay over the cigarette haze.  He looked familiar, but I couldn’t place him.  He had a Michael Scott vibe to him, if Michael Scott quit bathing and shaving and did a lot of cocaine.  He lurched toward the bar, barking for a double of something cheap enough to strip paint, and when the bartender – a woman with arms like a longshoreman and a stare that could castrate – told him to fuck off, he tried to charm her with a grin that showed teeth like a row of condemned tenements.  “You know I’m good for it,” this loser pleaded.  “Please…they’re closing in!  My whole family’s about to go to prison…all of our friends!  ‘Seditious treason,’ they’re saying!  Whatever the fuck that is.  Please!  I’m begging you!  Give me a drink!”
“Hunter, I told you to fuck OFF!” hollered the bartender, who then slugged a mouthful of whiskey, spit it all over this nebbish, pulled out her lighter, and lit him on fire.  The whole place erupted in laughter, a raw, hyena howl, as he ran out into the night, trailing a stench of failure and cheap, flaming whiskey.  I scribbled it all down, my pen moving like a switchblade, knowing this was the kind of night that’d leave scars. 

Now go forth, sexy reader, and wield “scrofulous” like a shotgun in your next ballroom rant.  Drop it in a sentence, scare the squares, and raise a glass to the glorious rot of language.

N.P.: “As Alive As You Need Me To Be” – Nine Inch Nails

July 18, 2025

Alright, dear reader, if you don’t know what day it is, you should.  Somewhere, in the halls of bourbon-soaked eternity, sits a man who once pistol-whipped conventional journalism, shoved it down a sandpaper slide, and baptized it in a pool of acid-laced self-awareness.  That man, born on July 18, 1937, amid the southern gothic sprawl of Louisville, Kentucky, would erupt into existence nothing less than a human bunker buster for the literary world – Hunter Stockton Thompson.  Today, we light a ceremonial joint, shotgun a tallboy, and salute the King of Gonzo in all his unhinged chaos.

To properly talk about Thompson (and honestly, to even try to keep your adjectives in place while doing so), is to ride shotgun in a careening Cadillac speeding toward the sharp cliff edge of meaning itself.  His invention of gonzo journalism was less a writing style and more a manifest scrawled in blood-red Sharpie on the back of society’s Ikea instruction manual.  Objectivity be damned; Thompson wasn’t about observing the story – he was the story.  He waded into the filthy trenches with his subjects, mainlined their madness, and stitched his fractured psyche across every page he produced.  Subtle? Hell no.  Effective?  Absolutely.

Take Hell’s Angels, for example.  He didn’t just “write about” those smoke-belching, bar-brawling apostles of chaos.  Nope…Thompson got in the saddle, ate their dust, drank their beer, and got his face caved in for the privilege.  He emerged – bloody, patched up, and somehow syllabically sharper – with one of the most brutally honest dissections of America’s outlaw soul.  But did he stop there?  Shee-it.  HST didn’t dabble in rebellion – he deep-throated the shotgun of conformity and loaded both barrels himself.

And then, of course, there is Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.  If the American Dream was an actual physical object, that book would’ve taken a staple gun to it and lit it on fire.  It’s a masterpiece of gonzo depravity – a demolition derby held inside the fragile collective skull of a nation limping out of the 1960s, hungover and disillusioned.  Riding high on mescaline, ether, and enough high-proof liquor to get entire third-world nations drunk, Thompson peeled back the tacky, neon-lit veneer of Vegas and revealed…well, ourselves.  Ugly.  Greedy.  High as hell.  And blaming it all on everyone else.  And I found it all very relatable.

I was an undergrad trying to figure out whether to major in music or English, and was dividing most of my class time between subjects.  I was taking a couple of creative writing classes, and in those classes, people kept asking me after class if I’d heard of Hunter Thompson and/or Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.  Eventually I went to Tower Books and picked up a copy.  It was a Friday afternoon.  I went home to my apartment, got comfortable on the couch, and started reading.  And I read the entire thing straight through (which was something I’d never done before), howling and cackling throughout the entire thing.  But more importantly, aside from being the funniest thing I’d ever read to that point, Vegas kicked me in the mind.  The next night I was on a dinner date, and I drank Chivas with my meal.  When Monday morning rolled around, I went to the Registrar’s Office and changed my major from Music to English.  Dr. Thompson had just blown open the possibilities of writing in my head…I didn’t know you could do that with writing.

But it wasn’t just what he wrote that mattered.  It was how he burned himself, raw and live, into the fabric of the narrative.  He shredded the wall between the observer and participant, reporter and drug-fueled maniac, proving that some truths are so ugly you have to punch them straight in the throat to make them talk.  And right there, bleeding in the dirt, is where he lived.  Where most authors tiptoed around controversy or built polite little fences to sit on, Thompson set the whole field on fire and rode through it naked on a motorbike.

Thompson ultimately left the world the same way he moved through it, with a thunderclap and zero regard for everyone’s fragile sensibilities.  But even in his absence, his spirit lingers in some of us, in every defiant middle finger flipped at the bastards trying to quash originality and every word typed by a writer who refuses to “play nice.”

Today, we remember not just Thompson’s birth but the explosion that came with it.  A reminder that the best way to honor a literary outlaw who lived without brakes is to live: messy, loud, and unapologetic.  Because fear is boring, conformity is worse, and the truth, no matter how grotesque, always tastes better when served raw with a fifth of Jack.

Happy birthday, Hunter.  Wherever the hell you are, I hope they’re letting you smoke.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’ve got a bottle of bourbon and a typewriter calling my name.  It’s what the good doctor would have wanted.

N.P.: “Lawyers, Guns & Money” – Warren Zevon

July 17, 2025

Seventy-eight years ago, a 25-year-old kid with a notebook and a bad case of existential itch packed himself into a car headed straight for the raw, writhing guts of America.  That kid was Jack Kerouac, and what he did that summer wasn’t just a road trip.  It was an existential tantrum dressed up as adventure – a booze-drenched fever dream of freedom with jazz riffs for punctuation and a reckless sprint toward something like divinity.  Or maybe the whole thing was just a desperate stab at drowning out the noise in his own head.  Either way, what came out the other end was On the Road, a book more combustible than a jerrycan of gas in a bonfire.

Picture it, dear reader.  July heat, just like the kind baking wherever you are right now in the northern hemisphere.  The kind of heat that makes the pavement shimmer, as if the road isn’t  just something to be traveled but something alive and pissed off, daring you to drive faster.  Kerouac had the windows rolled all the way down, likely because the car was either without A/C or it was simply harder to breathe in when the windows were shut.  And there he was, pinballing across the country with the verve – and perhaps hygiene – of a man who needed this drive not just to live but to avoid imploding.  There’s probably a word for the energy he was chasing, but it’s not in English.  It’s a headspace between euphoria and collapse, where everything burns brighter and breaks harder.

And the kid?  He scribbled through it.  Through the truck stops and motel ashtrays, through the miles of asphalt stretching out ahead like some cosmic dare.  Jazz on the radio, junkie poets for company, and God knows what in the flask riding shotgun.  Kerouac wrote like a man possessed – not by demons, but by something much scarier: hope.  Not the easy Hallmark variety, but the bone-deep, terrifying kind that makes you wonder if somewhere, out there, there’s a way to fill whatever black hope keeps chewing through your insides.

When On the Road his shelves in 1957, it was a lit match in a room full of dynamite.  Suddenly, every Poor Bastard in America who’d been staring down the barrel of nine-to-five mediocrity had permission to trash the manual.  This wasn’t about winning; it was about searching.  About saying “fuck it” to the scripts we’re handed and chasing the kind of truth that burns like whiskey going down.

Many made the mistake of calling it romantic.  But the road isn’t about romance – it’s about friction.  [The same could be said about sex, of course.]  The kind of friction that leaves you scorched and skinned and shaking but alive in a way you forgot you could be.  Kerouac wasn’t glorifying anything.  He was giving us the messy, bloody glory of coming undone – and maybe finding God in the process.  Although, spoiler alert, it probably wasn’t the God you’re thinking of.

Fast forward to right now.  July 17, 2025.  Do the math, dear reader.  You’re not too old, too broke, or too goddamn civilized to take your own swing at this.  You won’t be Kerouac – good.  He already did it, and you wouldn’t survive on the kind of coffee and amphetamines that fueled him anyway.  But was you can do is crack open a notebook, climb into whatever vehicle you’ve got, and chase something that’ll look different from freedom but feel just as dangerous.

And maybe when you’re out there burning rubber through the sticky American night, you’ll catch a little of the jazzed-up chaos Kerouac found.  And I’ll be out there with you, chasing the same thing.  Just make sure when you catch it, write it down.

N.P.: “I Gotcha” – Eleven Triple Two, Ghostwriter