Word of the Day: querulous

 

Querulous
Adj. Complaining in a petulant, whining manner; peevish, fretful, or given to incessant grumbling, often over trivialities.
Derived from Latin querulus, from queri (to complain), with roots in Proto-Indo-European kwes– (to wheeze or sigh).  Late Middle English snatched it up around the 15th century, slapping it onto those who moan like a creaky floorboard under a fat man’s boot.

My office in the Safe House, where the Dissolute Desk sits, has become a bit derelict, maybe even ramshackle, lately.  It’s a literary warzone of crumpled manuscripts, half-empty bourbon bottles, and cigarette burns that map out my existential crises.  I’d been drowning in my own detritus – pizza boxes stacked like postmodern ziggurats, dust bunnies breeding with the ferocity of roaches in a California dumpster – so I hired a housekeeper.  Enter Mrs. Fingerbottom. 

She arrived, a wiry specter in a floral apron, her face a topographical map of disapproval, lips pursed like she’d just sucked a lemon through a straw.  I’d hoped for a stoic domestic warrior, a Mrs. Doubtfire with a broom and a can-do spirit.  Instead, I got this querulous old bat, her voice a nasal dirge that could make a saint chuck his halo and reach for the whiskey.  “The curtains are filthy,” she’d whine, brandishing her feather duster like some scepter of judgement.  “And these books – stacked like a hobo’s lean-to!  How do you live in this squalor?”  Each syllable dripped with the petulance of a dowager who’d found a fly in her vichyssoise. 

I tried to ignore her, barricading myself behind my typewriter, hammering out prose while she shuffled through my chaos, muttering dark imprecations about the state of my socks.  But her complaints were a sonic assault, a relentless drip-drip-drip of grievance that eroded my sanity faster than a three-day bender in Tijuana.  One day, she stood over my desk, clutching a moldy coffee mug like it was evidence in a war crimes trial.  “This,” she hissed, pissed off, “is an affront to hygiene!”  I wanted to set light to her.  I wanted to scream, to tell her to take her sanctimonious scrubbing and sit on it and spin, but I just grinned, and poured another shot.  Because I’ve come to understand that in this ridiculous existence, even a nagging witch like Mrs. Fingerbottom is just another character in the lunatic narrative I’m apparently doomed to write. 

N.P.: “My Love” – Die Symphony

August 25, 2025

 

Well, hell, dear reader…it’s Monday again.  Today we’re faceplanting into the chaotic intersection where fate decided to play cosmic jukebox with two literary badasses.  August 25 – a date that should be etched in bourbon and typewriter ribbon – gave us both a literary assassin’s birth cry in 1938 and watched a literary butterfly’s final flutter in 1984.

Frederick Forsyth slithered into existence on this very day, though he probably emerged from the womb clutching a press pass and muttering something about covert operations in three languages.  Uncle Fred had the audacity to gift us The Day of the Jackal, which, and I’m not ashamed to admit this despite my well-documented pharmaceutical enthusiasm and questionable life choices – housed my second-favorite literary character during those formative years when I was still young enough to believe adults knew what they were doing.

The Jackal, that ice-cold professional with his meticulous attention to detail and his absolutely zero-fucks-given approach to geopolitics, captured something primal in my pre-adolescent imagination.  Here was a character who treated assassination like a particularly complex chess problem, complete with multiple identities, forged papers, and the kind of methodical precision that would make a Swiss watchmaker weep with envy.  The Count of Monte Cristo held the top spot, as you know – because what red-blooded vengeance-minded literary maniac doesn’t worship at the altar of Dumas’ revenge masterpiece – but The Jackal ran a damn close second.

This, oddly enough, came up in a talk I was having with my psychiatrist a couple of years back, when we were trying to untie the knot of some of my more unusual personality traits.  He wanted to know what it was about these characters [our discussion included a couple of other, similarly “dark” characters] that grabbed me by the intellectual throat.  After some thought, I told him it was their shared commitment to the long game, their willingness to subsume their entire existence into the service of a singular, magnificent obsession.  The Count had his decades-long revenge plot; The Jackal had his surgical approach to political elimination.  Both understood that true artistry requires patience, preparation, and an almost pathological attention to detail.  We’ll definitely be diving significantly deeper into all that in the book, so we’ll leave it there for now.  But if you haven’t, check out The Day of the Jackal, if you’re into dispassionate badassery.

While Forsyth was celebrating another year of breathing on this planet in 1984, Truman Capote – that brilliant, tortured, fabulous wreck of literary genius – was taking his final bow.  August 25th, 1984, marked the end of a man who had revolutionized non-fiction with In Cold Blood and scandalized high society with Answered Prayers.

Capote died at 59, which in literary years is basically infancy – especially considering the prodigious amounts of chemical enhancement many of us require just to function at baseline creativity levels.  The man who gave us Holly Golightly and redefined true crime narrative structure succumbed to what the medical establishment politely called “liver disease due to multiple drug intoxication,” which is basically doctor-speak for “he had Too Much Fun.”

The beautiful irony isn’t lost on me: on the same calendar date, we celebrate the birth of a master of cold, calculated fiction and mourn the death of a master of warm, devastating truth.  Forsyth gave us The Jackal – methodical, emotionally detached, professionally lethal.  Capote gave us characters who bled authentic human messiness all over the page, who made us feel things we weren’t entirely comfortable feeling.

Both men understood something fundamental about the writing life: sometimes you have to become someone else entirely to tell the truth.  Forsyth disappeared into his research, becoming a journalistic chameleon who could write about international intrigue with the authority of someone who’d actually lived it.  Capote disappeared into his subjects’ lives, becoming so intimately connected to Perry Smith and Dick Hickock that their story became indistinguishable from his own psychological journey.

And maybe that’s what drew me to The Jackal all those decades ago – not just the character’s professional competence, but the recognition that great art, requires a kind of controlled schizophrenia, a willingness to fragment yourself across multiple identities in service of the story.  Every writer worth their whiskey knows this feeling: the moment when you stop being yourself and start being the conduit for something larger, stranger, and infinitely more dangerous than your normal, everyday consciousness.

So here’s to August 25th, a collision of literary birth and death.  Here’s to Forsyth, who, unfortunately, passed on June 9th of this year.  And here’s to Capote, who burned out but never faded away.  And here’s to The Jackal, that cold-blooded professional who taught a young reader that sometimes the most compelling characters are the ones who’ve learned to disappear completely into their work.

After all, isn’t that what we’re all trying to do?  Disappear so completely into our craft that what emerges isn’t us anymore, but something infinitely more interesting?
[Raises glass of something appropriately destructive]
To the professionals, living and dead.  May their aim always be true.

N.P.: “Late Night Call” – Goblin, Alan Howarth, Retrofuture

August 24, 2025

 

Good goddamn afternoon, dear reader.  If I was a mere mortal left to my own devices, I would likely spend today bitching about how exhausting it is to constantly be fighting various forces of shittiness every day, whether it’s the government, the matrix, friends and family, the woke, the System, the general public.  And it is exhausting.  But I figured out a while ago, life is fighting every day.  You’re fighting a war every single day, and it never ends.  And the enemy won’t let up if you’re sick, or are in the middle of a nervous breakdown or whatever, no…they will only take advantage of your weakened condition.  So bitch today I shan’t.  I’ll just keep up The Fight, and keeping an eye out for new places to stack bodies.

So instead, today I want to blow the whistle on the most elaborate con game this side of a Vegas poker tournament – and trust me, I’ve been both the mark and the dealer in this particular house of marked cards.

Picture this if you can: a 17-year-old version of yrs. truly, wide-eyed and bushy-tailed, stumbling through the hallowed halls of community college like some kind of educational pilgrim seeking enlightenment, only to discover that the promised land was actually a strip-mall diploma mill staffed by adjunct professors living in their cars and full-time faculty who’d rather be anywhere else doing literally anything else for twice the pay.

But did I learn?  Hell no.  I doubled down like degenerate pervert gambler chasing a royal flush with pocket twos.

Four years of undergraduate purgatory later – during which I accumulated exactly zero student loan debt (because I always had a job in college, and this was obviously not something worth going in debt for), but did acquire a working knowledge of precisely how many ways one can deconstruct the inherent patriarchal implications of grocery store checkout lanes – I found myself clutching a bachelor’s degree that qualified me for exactly one thing: more school.

So naturally, being the kind of masochist who enjoys having his intellectual teeth pulled without anesthesia, I enrolled in graduate school, where I spent another year (yeah, I did grad school in a year.  At that point I could have probably gone on to get a doctorate in about 3 months) learning to speak in the kind of serpentine academic prose that would make one of Hakeem Jeffries’ dumb-ass filibusters sound like a haiku.

The punchline?  The only job this entire academic odyssey qualified me for was teaching other people how to navigate the same labyrinthine bureaucracy of intellectual masturbation that had just spent five years systematically destroying my will to live.

Here’s where it gets really beautiful in that special way that watching a plane crash in slow motion can be beautiful: when I actually tried to teach students how to think – not what to think, but the radical concept of independent critical analysis – I was about as welcome as a functioning fire alarm in a crack house.

See, the dirty not-so-little secret that most people are terrified to acknowledge is that higher education has become less about education and more about indoctrination, less about developing minds capable of independent thought and more about mass-producing ideologically compliant foot soldiers who can organize the shit out of protest march but couldn’t balance a checkbook or run a for-profit business if their lives depended on it.

The numbers don’t lie, even when the institutions do: college graduation rates hover around 60% for four-year institutions and an absolutely dismal 29% for community colleges.  Let that sink in for a sec – these places are failing to graduate even half their students, yet we continue to funnel young people into this academic meat grinder like some kind of educational Soylent Green factory.

But here’s the really insidious part: the students who do manage to survive this intellectual hazing ritual emerge not as critical thinkers or problem solvers, but a zealous activists armed with undergraduate degrees in Gender Studies and enough righteous indignation to power a small city, yet somehow lacking the basic skills necessary to function in any capacity that doesn’t involve organizing boycotts or composing strongly-worded tweets about microaggressions.

Meanwhile, the STEM fields – you know, the disciplines that actually require students to engage with objective reality rather than constructing elaborate theoretical frameworks to explain why mathematics is racist – continue to produce graduates who can build bridges that don’t collapse, develop medicines that actually work, and create technologies that improve human lives rather than simply providing new platforms for performative outrage.

The rest of higher education has become nothing more than a grotesquely overpriced finishing school for professional complainers, a four-to-six-year program in how to transform every conceivable human interaction into an opportunity for moral preening and victim status acquisition.

And the cost?  Oh sweet merciful Christ, the cost.  Students are graduating with debt loads that would have bought them comfortable middle-class lifestyles just a generation ago, all for the privilege of being certified unemployable in any field that requires actual productivity rather than simply the ability to identify and catalog various forms of systemic oppression.

The faculty – and I say this as someone who’s been on both sides of this particular con game – are either true believers in the cause, drunk on their own ideological Kool-Aid and genuinely convinced they’re saving the world one consciousness-raising session at a time, or cynical opportunists who’ve figured out the academia is the last refuge for people who want to get paid for having opinions while never having to actually test those opinions against the harsh realities of the marketplace.

The administration, meanwhile, consists entirely of bureaucrats whose primary qualification is their ability to speak fluent horseshit while extracting maximum tuition revenue from students who are too young and naïve to understand they’re being sold a bill of goods that makes shooting dice on the street look like a noble profession.

So here’s my advice to any young person currently contemplating higher education: if you want to be a doctor, and engineer, a scientific researcher, or anything else that requires actual technical knowledge and skills, by all means, go to college.  Learn calculus, organic chemistry, or hot to design a bridge that won’t fall down when someone sneezes on it.

But if you’re thinking about majoring in anything that ends with “Studies” or requires you to write papers about your feelings regarding the intersection of race, class, and gender in 19th-century flower arrangement, save yourself the time and money.  You’ll learn more about the world by working a series of minimum-wage jobs than you will by spending four years in an academic echo chamber being taught to see oppression in everything from breakfast cereal to traffic lights.

The great irony is that higher education – the institution supposedly dedicated to the pursuit of knowledge and the development of critical thinking skills – has become the very antithesis of both, a place where curiosity goes to die and independent thought is systematically beaten out of students like some kind of intellectual conversion therapy.

And the most delicious part of this whole sick joke?  The people running this scam have convinced society that questioning their methods makes you anti-intellectual, when in fact, the most intellectually honest thing anyone can do at this point is to call bullshit on the entire enterprise and start over from scratch.

Because that’s what this is, dear reader: a massive, institutionalized fraud that makes Bernie Madoff look like a small-time grifter, and it’s time someone had the balls to say it out loud.

The emperor isn’t just naked – he’s charging admission for people to come look at his invisible clothes.

Class dismissed.

N.P.: “Never Right” – SIERRA VEINS

August 23, 2025

 

Happy Saturday, my dearest reader.  Yesterday I was pulled away from the Dissolute Desk on urgent government business, and I regrettably missed an important day on the D.P.S. calendar.  Yesterday, August 22nd, was the day the cosmos decided to bless us with one Raymond Douglas Bradbury.  And I, due to the aforementioned government business resulting in a catastrophic failure of my moral obligations to the literary gods, completely and utterly whiffed it.  Blew past it like a bat out of some very strange and beautifully rendered hell.

One hundred and five years, or thereabouts, since the man first started inhaling oxygen.  And where was I?  Engaged in some deeply unimpressive, bureaucratic rescue mission.  How embarrassing.  The sheer, uncut, high-octane shame of it all is a heavy coat, dear reader.  I’ve missed deadlines, flights, and the occasional dental appointment, but missing the birth-date of the guy who basically invented the poignant sci-fi liver kick?  That feels like a special category of personal failing, a stain on my already questionable permanent record, governmental callings be damned.

To be clear, we’re talking about the architect of Fahrenheit 451, a book so prescient it feels less like fiction and more like a user manual for the last decade.  He’s the guy who took the simple, Rockwellian canvas of the American Midwest and splattered it with alien loneliness and the quiet terror of a passing carnival.  He saw the future, not as a chrome-plated utopia of flying cars, but as a place of profound human longing, where technology mostly just gave us newer, more efficient ways to be sad and isolated.  And he did it all with prose that could make a poet weep.

To have built entire worlds – worlds that are now permanently etched onto the collective cerebral cortex of anyone with a library card and a soul – and for some over-caffeinated scribe to neglect to raise a glass on the proper day…well, it’s a cosmic joke of the highest order.  A real something-wicked-this-way-comes level of disregard.

I picture Ray, somewhere out in the great, starry expanse he wrote about so lovingly, looking down and shaking his head.  Not in anger, but with that signature blend of knowing sadness and wry amusement.  He’d probably get it.  He understood human folly better than anyone.  He knew we were all just a bunch of flawed, forgetful apes running around, trying our best not to burn the books or miss the important things.

So here it is, 24 hours late and a dollar short: Happy Birthday, Ray.  Thanks for the Martians, the witches, and the firemen.  Thanks for making us look at the stars and feel a little less alone, and a little more terrified, all at once.  I’ll be over here, trying to recalibrate my entire existence and setting approximately 17 alarms for next year.  Forgive me.  Or don’t.  You’ve earned the right to be picky.

N.P.: “Let It All Go” – Beats Antique, Preservation Hall Jazz Band

Word of the Day: caterwaul

Alrighty, then, dear reader…let’s get to it.  Today’s Word of the Day is caterwaul.

(verb) To make a shrill, wailing noise, like a cat in heat or your pathetic ex at 2 a.m. after three tequila shots too many.
(noun) A loud, unpleasant screeching sound, often associated with drama, chaos, or the unholy union of both.
This gem of a word slinks into English from the Middle Dutch cater (meaning “tomcat”) and waul (meaning “to yowl”).  Basically, it’s the linguistic lovechild of a feral alley cat and a banshee.

It was a Sunday morning in Brooklyn, the kind of morning where the air smells like burnt espresso and retribution.  I was nursing a hangover that felt like a symphony of jackhammers in my skull but MGMT had insisted I attend this “brunch for progressive thought leaders.”  Translation: a mimosa-fueled circle jerk of liberal white women in wide-brimmed hats and ethically sourced linen jumpsuits.
The café was called something insufferable like “Thyme & Privilege,” and the menu featured items like “deconstructed avocado toast” and “locally foraged mushroom foam.”  I was halfway through a Bloody Mary that tasted like spicy motor oil when the conversation turned to the topic of “allyship,” which, as per our usual arrangement, isn’t even a word, but I kept my mouth shut, because I knew it was only going to get worse, and I should keep my powder dry as long as I can.  That’s when it happened – The Caterwaul.
It started as a low hum, a kind of collective throat-clearing, and then crescendoed into a full-blown cacophony of performative wailing.  One woman, who introduced herself as “Moonbeam,” began sobbing about the emotional labor of explaining intersectionality to her yoga instructor.  Another, clutching a turmeric latte like it was a life raft, lamented the “violence” of being unfollowed on Instagram by her Reiki healer.
The shrieking reached its peak when a woman named Karen (yes, really) stood up and declared, “I just feel so seen right now,” before collapsing into a heap of organic cotton and crocodile tears.  It was like watching a Greek tragedy, but with more gluten-free pastries.  I left before the kombucha shots came out, but not before stealing a mason jar of artisanal honey labeled “Bee Kind.”  Because irony. 

N.P.: “White Rabbit” – Collide

August 20, 2025

Guess what today is, dear reader.  Well, yeah, smart ass…it’s August 20th.  But do you know the significance?  Today we are celebrating the birth of a man who somehow managed to make tentacles terrifying long before Japanese pop culture turned them into something else entirely – though let’s be honest, Howard Phillips Lovecraft probably would have found that particular cultural evolution more horrifying than anything he ever conjured up in his fever dreams of non-Euclidean geometry and cities that shouldn’t exist but absolutely do in the space between your third drink and your fourth panic attack.

And yes, before you ask, I am already three whiskeys deep into this tribute, because how else does one properly commemorate the birthday of a guy who spent his entire literary career essentially screaming “THE UNIVERSE IS INDIFFERENT TO YOUR EXISTENCE AND ALSO THERE ARE FISH PEOPLE” at anyone within earshot?

The thing about Howard – and I’m calling him Howard because we’re birthday buddies now, cosmically speaking – is that he possessed this absolutely deranged ability to take the fundamental anxiety of existing in a universe that makes no sense whatsoever (which, let’s face it, it pretty much the human condition distilled to its purest essence) and transform it into prose so dense with subordinate clauses and baroque descriptive passages that reading it becomes its own kind of madness-inducing experience, a literary equivalent of staring directly into the abyss while the abyss files your taxes incorrectly and charges you late fees.

Dig, if you will (and you will, because I’m not giving you a choice here), the sheer audacity of a man who looked at the conventional horror tropes of his era – your garden variety ghosts, vampires, werewolves, things that go bump in the night and occasionally demand your lunch money – and said, “No, thank you, I’ll take cosmic insignificance with a side of tentacles and an extra serving of geometry that makes mathematicians weep.”  This is a writer who made angles scary.  Fucking angles!  Try explaining that so someone at a party.  Try explaining that to someone at a party.  I’ve tried, and it went something like this: “Well, you see, it’s not just any angle, it’s a non-Euclidean angle, which means it exists in ways that shouldn’t be possible, and also it’s probably connected to an ancient god-thing that regards humanity the way you regard the bacteria living in your kitchen sponge.”

But here’s where it gets deliciously absurd (and by delicious, I mean the kind of delicious that makes you questions your life choices while simultaneously reaching for another drink): Lovecraft, this master of cosmic horror, this architect of existential dread, was apparently afraid of air conditioning.  The man who created Cthulhu – a creature so cosmically horrifying that merely glimpsing it drives people insane – was reportedly intimidated by modern technology to the point where he probably would have had a complete nervous breakdown if confronted with a smartphone notification.

The irony is so thick you could cut it with a sword forged in the fires of Azathoth’s blind idiot piping (which, for the non-English majors, is basically Lovecraft’s way of saying “really, really hot”), and yet somehow this contradiction makes perfect sense when you consider that his entire literary project was essentially an elaborate exploration of the terror that comes from realizing you don’t understand the world you’re living in – which, when you think about it, is exactly how most of us feel when trying to figure out why our Wi-Fi stopped working or why our car is making that weird noise that definitely wasn’t there yesterday but night have been there for months and we just now noticed it because we finally turned off the radio.

And let’s talk about that prose style for a moment.  Because reading Lovecraft is like being trapped in a very erudite Nyquil dream where every sentence contains at least 17 dependent clauses, three semicolons, and at least one reference to something that sounds vaguely geological but is actually a sleeping god whose dreams are responsible for that recurring nightmare you have about showing up to work in your underwear, except in this case your underwear is made of cosmic horror and your workplace is a dimension that exists perpendicular to reality.

The man wrote sentences so labyrinthine that getting to the end of one feels like completing a particularly challenging obstacle course designed by someone who studied both architecture and madness with equal dedication, which is to say that by the time you reach the period, you’ve forgotten not only where the sentence began but also your own name, your social security number, and whether or not you remembered to feed your cat this morning (spoiler alert: you didn’t, and now your cat is plotting you demise with the same cold calculation that Nyarlathotep  brings to his role as the Crawling Chaos).

But here’s the thing that gets me, the thing that makes me raise my glass (again) to old Howard on this, his birthday: despite all the cosmic pessimism, despite the fundamental belief that humanity is essentially a cosmic accident that will be forgotten as soon as the starts align correctly and the Old Ones wake up from their Really Long Nap, despite the prose style that requires a graduate degree in recursive sentence structure just to parse – despite all of this, there’s something weirdly optimistic about the whole enterprise.

Because think about it: Lovecraft spent his entire career imagining horrors so vast and incomprehensible that they make our daily anxieties seem laughably insignificant by comparison.  Worried about your mortgage?  Well, at least Yog-Sothoth isn’t trying to manifest through your bathroom mirror.  Stressed about some deadline at work?  Could be worse…you could be a character in “The Colour Out of Space” watching your entire family slowly dissolve into something that probably violates several laws of physics.

It’s horror as therapy, cosmic dread as a form of perspective-checking, existential terror as a weird kind of comfort food for people who find regular comfort food insufficiently terrifying and also lacking in tentacles.

And yes, we have to acknowledge that Howard had some serious issues with, well, pretty much everyone who wasn’t a white Anglo-Saxon Protestant living in New England circa 1920, which is to say that his personal brand of cosmic horror came with a heft side order of terrestrial horror that was, frankly, way more horrifying than anything involving fish people or dream dimensions, because at least the fish people had the decency to be fictional.

But here’s where literature gets weird and complicated and sometimes beautiful in spite of itself: somehow, through the alchemy of time and cultural evolution and the strange way that stories take on lives of their own once they’re released into the world, Lovecraft’s cosmic nightmares have become a kind of shared language for anyone who’s ever felt overwhelmed by the sheer incomprehensible vastness of existence – which is to say, anyone who’s ever been alive and paying attention for more than five consecutive minutes.

His creatures and concepts have escaped their original context and become metaphors for everything from corporate bureaucracy to social media algorithms to the general feeling of being a tiny, confused biological entity trying to make sense of a universe that operates according to rules nobody bother to explain to you and also the rulebook is written in a language that doesn’t exist and even if it did exist, it would probably drive you insane just to read it.

So here’s to you, Howard Phillips Lovecraft, on this sweltering August 20th, your birthday and mine to celebrate: thank you for taking the fundamental weirdness of being alive and cranking it up to eleven, then breaking off the volume knob and feeding it to something with too many teeth and not enough regard for the laws of physics.

Thank you for showing us that sometimes the best way to deal with the incomprehensible vastness of existence is to imagine it’s even more incomprehensible and vastly more vast than we originally thought, and also it has tentacles and probably wants to eat our dreams.

Thank you for proving that you can write sentences so complex that they become their own form of cosmic horror, where the real monster isn’t some ancient god sleeping beneath the ocean but the dangling participle that’s been haunting your prose since paragraph three.

And thank you most of all for reminding us that in a universe full of Things That Should Not Be, sometimes the most radical act is to imagine Things That Really, Definitely Should Not Be, and then spend your entire life writing about them with the kind of obsessive dedication usually reserved for people who collect vintage bottle caps or know way too much about the genealogy of minor European nobility.

Happy birthday, you magnificent, troubled, utterly singular architect of nightmares.  May your non-Euclidean angles remain forever acute, may your Old Ones stay comfortably asleep for at least another few decades, and may your literary legacy continue to inspire writers to create sentences so grammatically complex that they require their own GPS system to navigate.

[Raises glass to the cosmic void, which probably isn’t paying attention but might be, which is somehow both more and less comforting than complete indifference]

Ph’nglui mglw’nath Cthulhu R’lyeh wgah’nagl fhtagn – and also, happy birthday, Howard.  Thanks for making the universe just a little bit weirder, which is exactly what it needed.

N.P.: “Cthulhu” – Gunship

August 19, 2025

 

The United Nations is as useless as tits on a bishop and it’s high time the United States withdrew from the U.N. and kick the entire corrupt institution out of New York City, demolish the building, and salt the earth where it formerly stood.

Anyone still harboring romantic notions about international cooperation probably believes in tooth fairies and functional democracy, and likely doesn’t read my stuff anyway, but just in case you do, we need to have a little chat about the United Nations, that sprawling, septuagenarian monument to humanity’s capacity for self-deception that squats like a modernist toad on Manhattan’s East Side.

Dig, if you will (and you must, because the alternative is madness), an organization conceived in the post-apocalyptic hangover of World War II, birthed by men who’d witnessed industrial-scale human barbarity and thought, “Hey, what this world needs is more committees!”  The UN emerged from this historical moment like some beautiful, naïve child stumbling into a den of wolves wearing three-piece suits and diplomatic immunity.  Except now, 79 years later, that child has grown into a grotesquely bloated bureaucratic hydra that couldn’t organize a coherent response to a toilet paper shortage, let alone genocide.

The Art of Failing Spectacularly: A Masterclass in International Incompetence
The UN’s track record over the past five decades reads like a satirical novel written by someone with an exceptionally dark sense of humor and an intimate understanding of institutional paralysis.  We’re talking about failures so profound, so systemically comprehensive, that they transcend mere incompetence and enter the realm of performance art.

Consider Rwanda, 1994: While nearly 800,000 human beings were being systematically slaughtered – that’s roughly one person every eleven seconds for one hundred days straight, a fact that should make your stomach drop into your shoes and stay there – the UN responded with the kind of bureaucratic hand-wringing that would make Pontius Pilate look decisive.  General Romeo Dallaire, a man whose desperate cables from the ground read like dispatches from hell itself, begged for intervention while UN headquarters debated the semantic implications of the word “genocide.”  Because apparently, when people are being hacked to death with machetes, the real priority is maintaining definitional precision.

The UN’s response was to reduce the peacekeeping force.  I’m not making this up – you couldn’t make this up, because reality has surpassed the darkest satirical imagination.  They literally pulled troops out while the killing accelerated, as if the solution to a house fire is fewer firefighters.

Then there’s Srebrenica, where UN peacekeepers – and I use that term with all the irony I can muster – stood by with their blue helmets and their impotent mandates while Bosnian Serb forces systematically murdered over 8,000 men and boys in what was designated a UN “safe area.”  The term “safe area,” it turns out, was about as meaningful as a chocolate teapot or a campaign promise.  The peacekeepers watched – literally watched – as buses loaded with condemned men drove past their checkpoints toward mass graves.

These aren’t bureaucratic oopsies or administrative fuck-ups.  These are moral catastrophes of such magnitude that they should have triggered some kind of institutional self-immolation, a collective organizational seppuku performed in shame before the world’s television cameras.

The Human Rights Council: A Comedy of Errors Written in Blood
Speaking of institutional comedy, let’s examine the UN Human Rights Council, an entity so completely divorced from its stated purpose that it makes reality TV look authentic.  This is a body where China, Cuba, and Saudi Arabia – nations whose understanding of human rights extends roughly as far as “humans have the right to obey the state” – sit in judgement of actual democracies like they’re moral authorities instead of, you know, oppressive regimes with track records that would make Orwell’s Big Brother take notes.

Between 2006 and 2022, this moronic body passed fully one-third of its resolutions condemning Israel while maintaining an almost Buddhist-like silence regarding Syria (where Assad has been conducting his own masterclass in creative population reduction), North Korea (the hermit kingdom that makes medieval feudalism look progressive), and Eritrea (which has achieved the remarkable feat of making its citizens nostalgic for Italian colonialism).

This isn’t selectivity; it’s moral blindness so complete it borders on the pathological.  It’s like having a fire department that exclusively responds to reports of birthday candles while ignoring five-alarm fires.

Oil-for-Food: Or How to Monetize Humanitarian Disaster
The Oil-for-Food Program – and doesn’t that name just roll off the tongue, like “Arbeit macht frei” or “I’m from the government and I’m here to help” – represents perhaps the UN s most spectacular achievement in transforming humanitarian aid into a corruption buffet.  Between 1995 and 2003, approximately $10 billion disappeared into some sort of black hole.

The program, ostensibly designed to provide humanitarian relief to Iraqi civilians suffering under sanctions, instead became Saddam Hussein’s personal ATM machine, complete with UN officials acting has helpful tellers.  Again, this wasn’t mere administrative incompetence – this was systematic corruption so brazen it would make a Biden blush.

And let’s not forget the sexual abuse scandals that have plagued UN peacekeeping operations like a particularly virulent strain of institutional syphilis.  In Haiti, the Central African Republic, and elsewhere, peacekeepers – the men supposedly sent to protect vulnerable populations – instead exploited them with the kind of impunity typically reserved for Somali warlords.

The UNRWA Files: When Humanitarian Aid Meets Terrorist Infrastructure
But if you really want to understand the depths of UN dysfunction, you need to look at the UNRWA scandal surrounding the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack – an event that revealed the organization’s relationship with terrorism to be less “unwitting accomplice” and more “enthusiastic co-conspirator.”

Israel intelligence uncovered evidence so damning it reads rather like a rejected screenplay from a movie about institutional corruption.  UNRWA employees – people whose paychecks come from international humanitarian funds – didn’t just look the other way while Hamas planned its attack; they actively participated.  A school counselor helped kidnap Israelis.  An elementary school teacher joined the assault on Re’im.  Another teacher spent the night before the attack equipping himself with anti-tank weapons, presumably not for use in lesson plans about conflict resolution.

These weren’t isolated incidents of individual radicalization; this was systematic infiltration so complete that UNRWA facilities were being used to store weapons and harbor hostages.  Emily Damari, held captive for 15 months, reported being detained in multiple UNRWA facilities.  The Israeli Defense Forces found assault rifles, grenades, and missiles hidden in UNRWA institutions, plus a tunnel beneath UNRWA’s main Gaza headquarters complete with computer servers and industrial batteries – because apparently, when you’re running a humanitarian organization, you need a secret underground lair.

And what was the UN’s response to these revelations?  A half-assed investigation that concluded nine staff members “may have been involved” while admitting they couldn’t independently verify the evidence because it remained in Israeli custody.  This is roughly the equivalent to investigating a bank robbery by asking the robbers if they did it and then shrugging when they don’t provide you the security footage.

The Case for Institutional Euthanasia
Here’s where things get interesting – and by interesting, I mean “apocalyptically obvious.”  The United States, which provides roughly 25% of the UN’s regular budget and approximately $18 billion annually to the broader UN system, is essentially funding its own diplomatic humiliation while subsidizing terrorism through organizations like UNRWA.

We’re paying over $18 billion a year – yep, billion with a “B” – to maintain an organization that has achieved the remarkable triple crown of being simultaneously ineffective, corrupt, and actively harmful to American interests.  This is like paying a contractor to burn down your house while charging you extra for the matches.

The security implications of hosting this carnival of dysfunction in New York City are particularly delicious.  We’re providing diplomatic immunity to representatives of regimes that would cheerfully see America reduced to radioactive ash, then expressing surprise when they engage in espionage and other recreational forms of national hostility.

A Modest Proposal for Urban Renewal
The solution is as elegant as it is overdue: withdraw American funding, revoke the UN’s lease on Manhattan real estate, and dismantle its headquarters.  Not out of petty spite – though deep spite would be entirely justified – but as a statement of moral clarity that transcends diplomatic niceties.

The current UN building should be razed through explosion.  One B2 strike will be sufficient.  Then the leaders of the five main religions should exorcise and bless the grounds as the rubble is cleared.  Once that is done, that piece of earth should be salted so that nothing may grow there, like the Romans did to Carthage, except without the genocide and with better construction permits.  Then perhaps it could be converted into something more useful – a shopping mall, a casino, or a memorial to complete institutional failure.

This isn’t about abandoning international cooperation; it’s about recognizing that the current system is so fundamentally broken that reform is impossible.  You don’t fix a car that’s been totaled in a head-on collision with reality – you scrap it and start over.

Conclusion: The Twilight of Illusions
The United Nations has evolved from humanity’s great experiment in collective security into a monument to bureaucratic dysfunction, moral cowardice, and institutional corruption.  Its failures aren’t unfortunate accidents; they’re predictable outcomes of an organization designed by committee to satisfy everyone while serving no one.

The time for pretending otherwise has passed.  The time for hoping that somehow, magically, fundamental structural reform will emerge from an organization that can’t even reform its own humanitarian agencies has passed.  The time for continuing to fund this elaborate performance of international cooperation while real crises unfold with deadly consequences has definitely passed.

What we need now is the kind of brutal honesty that recognizes when an institution has outlived any possible usefulness and become actively harmful to the values it was created to protect.  The UN’s headquarters should be demolished not only in anger, but in acknowledgment – a concrete recognition that humanity deserves better than this expensive, ineffective theater of diplomacy.

Let the rubble serve as a reminder: good intentions, no matter how noble, are no substitute for competence, accountability, and moral courage.  And sometimes, the most humanitarian thing you can do is put a failed institution out of its misery before it fails anyone else.

N.P.: “Hypnotic” – Dead Sara

August 18, 2025

Happy Monday, dear reader, as I sit behind the Dissolute Desk in the Safe House.  Today we raise a glass (or a bottle, or hell, a whole goddamn keg) to two wildly different but equally audacious moments in the annals of literary history.

First up, 1958.  The year Vladimir Nabokov unleashed Lolita on unsuspecting American readers, a book so incendiary it might was well have come with a warning label: “Caution: May cause apoplectic pearl clutching, moral outrage, and existential crises.”  This novel was a bunker-buster of prose hurled directly at the glass house of societal norms.  Nabokov, that sly, butterfly-chasing bastard, took the English language, bent it over his knee, and spanked it into submission.  The result was a story about Humbert Humbert, a man so charmingly vile you almost forget he’s the literary equivalent of a trainwreck you can’t turn away from.

But here’s the thing: Lolita is a masterpiece because it doesn’t give a damn what you think.  It exists on its own terms, unapologetic and unflinching, like a middle finger raised to the heavens.  And that, dear reader, is the kind of literary badassery I still aspire to.

Now, let’s pivot from the sublime to the ridiculous, because August 18 is also National Bad Poetry Day.  Indeed, a whole day dedicated to the art of writing poetry so atrocious it makes your high school emo phase look like Shakespeare.  This is the day we celebrate the cringeworthy couple, the mangled metaphor, the rhyme so forced it might as well be wearing a ski mask.  And I find a great deal of shabby glory in the whole thing.

Because bad poetry is the ultimate act of rebellion against the pretentious gatekeepers of “serious” literature.  And let’s face it, modern American poetry is almost universally shit, and has been for decades.  Bad Poetry Day is basically a day we get to drop the façade and quit pretending verse has been anything but dreck and dross for most of your lifetimes, even if it took the poet years to finish the poem.  It’s a reminder that writing doesn’t always have to be profound or polished or Pulitzer-worthy.  Sometimes, it’s enough to just let the words spill out, messy and imperfect and gloriously human.  So go ahead, write that haiku about your cat’s ass.  Pen that sonnet to your morning hangover.  Embrace the absurdity, because bad poetry is proof that even when we fail, we’re still creating.  And that, dear reader, is always a victory worth celebrating.

So here, then, is a truly bad poem from yrs. truly about Nabokov’s Lolita, just to show you how it’s done.

Oh, Lolita, you scandalous book,
With Humbert’s gaze, so creepy it shook.
A tale of obsession, taboo, and despair,
But mostly just Humbert being a nightmare.
Your prose is like butter, so smooth and divine,
But the subject?  Shit.  It Crosses The Line.
A nymphet, he calls her, with a wink and a grin,
But we all know, bro, that’s a helluva sin.
Butterflies flutter, metaphors soar,
But Humbert, my dude, you’re rotten to the core.
Nabokov, you genius, you wordsmith supreme,
Why’d you make us root for this fever dream?
So here’s to Lolita, both brilliant and grim,
A literary masterpiece…about him.
It’s art, it’s scandal, it’s a moral grenade,
And now I need a shower.  Pass the Kool-Aid.

Yowza.  That is truly shit.  Doesn’t get much worse than that.  Or does it?  If you think you can do worse, dear reader, by all means…this is the day to let it fly.

So here’s to August 18, a day that reminds us why we fell in love with words in the first place.  Whether it’s Nabokov’s razor-sharp prose or a dirty limerick so bad it makes your teeth hurt, today is the day to revel in the chaos, the beauty, and the sheer audacity of literature.

Cheers.

N.P.: “Carry On” – Mr. Strange

Word of the Day: rathskeller

Happy Sunday, dear reader.  Let me introduce you to rathskeller: a basement restaurant or tavern, typically one serving beer and hearty Germanic fare, where the lighting is dim, the atmosphere thick with the promise of shitty decisions, and the clientele ranges from the questionably employed to the aggressively unemployable.

We stole it from the German Ratskeller, literally “council cellar” – because apparently even medieval bureaucrats needed somewhere to drink themselves into legislative oblivion.  The word combines Rat (council) and Keller (cellar), though let’s be honest, the only council happening in most modern rathskellers involves debating whether that fifth shot of Jägermeister was a diplomatic triumph or an act of war against one’s liver.

Speaking of questionable decisions, I once found myself in such an establishment during what I’ll generously call my “young and stupid” phase (as opposed to my current “older and marginally less stupid” phase).  Picture this: It’s 2 AM, I’m three schnapps deep, and my date – a charming woman who claimed to be “between careers” but whose LinkedIn profile suggested she was between decades – decides we should order the house specialty.  Now, in any respectable rathskeller, you’d expect schnitzel or bratwurst.  But this place?  They brought us what can only be described as a crime against both German cuisine and the Geneva Convention: a pretzel the size of a steering wheel topped with what they optimistically called “artisanal cheese” but smelled suspiciously like corpse feet. 

My date took one bit, declared it “rustic,” and proceeded to eat the entire thing while maintaining eye contact.  It was weird.  I knew right then I was either witnessing true love or a serial killer testing my resolve.  It was neither.  She stuck me with the $47 tab and disappeared into the night like some sort of overpriced pretzel bandit.  For no good reason at all, I went back the next week.  Apparently, my standards for both food and romance had officially hit rock bottom, and they were serving it with a side of regret and mustard that definitely wasn’t Grey Poupon. 

N.P.: “Touch” – Wolfsheim

August 16, 2025

 

So here we are again, dear reader, gathered around the literary campfire like a couple of degenerate scholars clutching our bottles of cheap wine and expired dreams, ready to sing the praises of the man who taught us that poetry doesn’t have to wear a tuxedo to a funeral – that sometimes it’s perfectly acceptable, even preferable, for verse to show up drunk, unshaven, and reeking of yesterday’s poor decisions.

Today marks the anniversary of August 16, 1920, when some cosmic chair-puller decided the world needed a man who would transform hangovers into haikus, who would alchemize the base metals of human failure into literary gold [Note: Honestly, dear reader, who else is going to give you alchemical references on a Saturday?  No one, that’s who.  Just sayin’.], and who would prove once and for all that you don’t need to be tortured by your art when life is perfectly willing to do the torturing for you.

Charles Bukowski – or Hank to those of us who like to pretend we knew him personally despite being more decades too late and several tax brackets too high – was the kind of writer who made the rest of us feel simultaneously inferior and relieved.  Inferior because, let’s face it, none of us will ever achieve that perfect synthesis of raw brutality and surprising tenderness that characterized his best work.  Relieved because thank God we don’t have to live through the kind of beautiful disaster that produced Post Office, Factotum, and Ham on Rye.

The man was essentially a one-person writing workshop for everyone who ever thought literature was too precious, too sanitized, too concerned with proper semicolon usage when what we really needed was someone to grab us by the literary lapels and scream, “Look, you pretentious fucks, this is what it actually feels like to be human!”  and he did this while maintaining a work ethic I can only dream about – thousands of poems, six novels, countless short stories, all produced while working dead-end jobs and drinking enough alcohol to float a small yacht.

But here’s where it gets complicated, because celebrating Bukowski means acknowledging the uncomfortable truth that separates the dilettantes from the devotees: the man wasn’t just playing at being a degenerate for artistic effect.  His was not some carefully cultivated persona designed to move units at Barnes & Noble.  This was authentic self-destruction, the Real Deal, unfiltered and unforgiving.  He lived the kind of life that most of us romanticize from the safety of our temperature-controlled offices, the kind of existence that looks glamorous in retrospect but probably felt like being slowly digested by a particularly sadistic snake.

What made Bukowski genuinely dangerous – and by dangerous I mean the kind of writer who forces you to reevaluate your entire relationship with both language and existence, as it did with me – was his refusal to apologize for any of it.  Not the drinking, not the gambling, not the brutal honesty about human relationships, not the way he could make a trip to the grocery store sound like a descent into one of Dante’s lesser-known circles of hell.  He wrote about ordinary humiliation with the kind of precision usually reserved for surgical procedures, and he did it without the safety net of ironic distance that most of us hide behind when confronting our own spectacular failures.

Let’s take Post Office, his semi-autobiographical novel about working for the United States Postal Service, which reads like Catch-22 if Joseph Heller had been raised on cheap beer and disastrous decisions instead of intellectual sophistication.  Bukowski transformed the mundane, banal bureaucratic nightmare of mail delivery into something approaching epic literature, proving that you don’t need to witness the fall of the Roman Empire to write about the human condition – sometimes all you need is a supervisor named Jonstone and the crushing realization that this job might not be temporary after all.

Or take his poetry, which achieved that rare feat of being simultaneously accessible and profound, like finding a twenty-dollar bill in a pair of jeans you were about to throw away.

Lines like “the free soul is rare, but you know it when you see it – basically because you feel good, very good, when you are near or with them” hit me hard, with the force of recognition.  The kind of truth that makes you stop whatever you’re doing and think, “Shit, this guy gets it.”

The irony, here, of course, which irony I suspect would have made Bukowski himself cackle 0 is that this man who spent his life running from respectability, who viewed literary establishment types with the same enthusiasm most people reserve for dental surgery, has becoming something approaching required reading in creative writing programs across the country.  College kids who’ve never worked a manual labor job in their lives are now studying his technique, analyzing his use of line breaks and discussing his “aesthetic choices” as if alcoholism were a literary device rather than a progressive disease.

But maybe that’s the point.  Maybe the ultimate joke is that Bukowski’s work survives not despite its rough edges but because of them, not because it fits neatly into academic categories but because it explodes them.  In an age where so much contemporary literature feels focus-grouped to death, workshopped into bland submission, and designed to offend absolutely no one while saying absolutely nothing, Bukowski’s voice still cuts through the noise like a rusty blade through a silk nightie.

So today, as we raise our glasses – and let’s be honest, we’re probably raising them anyway, Hank’s birthday or not – let’s toast the man who proved that literature doesn’t have to be polite to be powerful, that poetry can smell like cigarettes and still move mountains, and sometimes the most profound truths come from the people society has written off as the most hopeless cases.

Here’s to Charles Bukowski: patron saint of the perpetually hungover, laureate of the legitimately lost, and reminder that sometimes the most beautiful flowers grow in the ugliest soil.  The man who showed us that rock bottom has excellent Wi-Fi and that the view from the gutter includes some spectacular sunsets.

Happy birthday, you bastard.  Know that the bar is still open, the typewriter still works, and somewhere in California, the spirit of honest literature is still stumbling through the streets, looking for the next great story and probably needing a ride home.

N.P.: “Night Has Turned to Day” – Fantastic Negrito