Happy September, dear reader.  Yo rent is due.

So picture this…September 1, 1952, and some editor at Life magazine is probably chain-smoking Lucky Strikes while wondering if they’ve just committed career suicide by dedicating an entire issue to what amounts to an extended fishing story.  I’m talking, of course, about Ernest Hemingway’s The Old Man and the Sea, a novella so deceptively simple it makes you wonder if maybe, just maybe,  you’ve been overthinking this whole literature thing your entire booze-addled existence.  Or maybe that’s just me.  Anyway, the editor mentioned above need not have worried, because the story’s success was absurd: five million copies.  In two days.  Two!  As if the entire American reader public suddenly developed an inexplicable craving for tales of Cuban fisherman wrestling with marlins the size of small automobiles.  Which, when you think about it, is exactly what happened, and isn’t that just the most ridiculous thing you’ve ever heard?

Now, I know what you’re thinking – because I’m thinking it too – what kind of masochistic genius does it take to craft a story that’s essentially one old guy versus one big fish and somehow make it feel like the entire human condition is hanging in the balance?  The answer, it turns out, involves the kind of narrative compression that would make a neutron star jealous, each sentence so dense with meaning it threatens to collapse into a literary black hole.

Santiago – our weathered protagonist who’s gone eighty-four days without catching so much as a sardine (which, let’s be honest, is the kind of professional dry spell that would drive most of us to day-drinking and career reconsideration) – embodies this magnificent futility that defines the human experience.  Here’s a man who knows, knows with the certainty of sunrise and hangovers, that he’s probably going to lose this battle.  The marlin is bigger, stronger, operates in its natural element while Santiago is basically a land mammal with delusions of aquatic grandeur.  And yet – and this is where Hemingway’s genius reaches levels of almost pornographic intensity – he fights anyway.

Because what else is there to do?  Surrender to the inevitable mediocrity of a fisherman who can’t catch fish?  Accept that maybe the universe is just one giant cosmic joke and we’re all the punchline?  Hell no.  Santiago straps himself to that boat and engages in what amounts to a three-day death match with a creature that represents everything he’ll never be – young, powerful, at home in the vast indifference of the sea.

The beauty of this whole setup – and by beauty I mean the kind of terrible beauty that makes you want to simultaneously laugh and cry and pour another drink – is how Hemingway strips away every unnecessary word, every flowery metaphor, every literary flourish that might distract from the essential brutality of the confrontation.  This is prose as sharp and unforgiving as a gaff hook, sentences that cut straight to the bone of meaning without bothering with the courtesy of anesthesia.

And the kicker?  Santiago wins and loses simultaneously.  He catches the goddamn fish – this magnificent beast that represents everything noble and wild and free in the world – only to watch the sharks reduce it to a skeleton during the long journey home.  Which is, of course, exactly what life does to all our grand ambitions and noble struggles.  We fight the good fight, we occasionally triumph, and then reality shows up like a pack of hungry sharks to remind us that victory is always temporary and defeat is the only universal constant.

But here’s what those five million readers understood, consciously or not, when they devoured this story faster than Americans consume processed cheese: Santiago’s defeat isn’t really a defeat at all.  It’s defiance.  It’s the middle finger raised to a universe that seems designed to crush the human spirit.  It’s the refusal to go gentle into that good night, even when you’re 84 years old and your hands are cramping and the sharks are circling and every rational part of your brain is screaming that this is madness.

When the formerly prestigious Pulitzer committee awarded Hemingway the prize in 1954, they weren’t just recognizing technical mastery – though God knows the technical mastery is there, every sentence calibrated with the precision of a Swiss chronometer.  They were acknowledging something deeper, more essential: the recognition that great literature isn’t about happy endings or moral clarity or the comfortable illusion that virtue is rewarded and evil punished.  Great literature is about the futility of human effort in the face of cosmic indifference, and finding beauty in that futility.

So today let’s raise a glass to Santiago and his marlin, to Hemingway and his impossible brevity, to the five million readers who recognized greatness when it slapped them across the face like a salty wave.  In a world that increasingly rewards mediocrity and celebrates participation trophies, The Old Man and the Sea stands as a monument to the idea that sometimes the most heroic thing you can do is fight a battle you know you’re going to lose.

Because in the end, isn’t that what we’re all doing anyway?

N.P.: “Sunglasses On At The Dollar Store” – Shockwire

Had an opportunity to spend some time at a cemetery today.  We’re in the middle of a bit of a heat wave right now in the Creek, so it was far too hot out there for my comfort.  But heat aside, it was rather pleasant.  Not to get all goth about it, but I’ve always liked cemeteries.  I find them, as I’d imagine most do, very peaceful.  Even at night.  Especially at night.  It’s never “creepy” or even morbid.  Walking among the stones is calming in a way few other things are.  The place is quiet, obviously, but that’s not where the peace and calm come from.  Those, for me, come from the sense of absolute inevitability.  Whatever may be weighing you down in your life at the moment weighs a lot less when you are reminded that no matter what you do, no matter what choices you make, no matter how intelligent or passionate or intuitive or loved you may be, you are going to end up right here.  I recommend spending some time at a cemetery occasionally.  It’s good for you.  You need to remind yourself that The Clock Is Ticking.

Anyway, we have a few items of calendric business to attend to.  To wit:

First up, Happy Birthday to William Saroyan who was born in 1908.  In the event that dear reader is not an English major, allow me to ‘splain.  He was the guy who proved that you don’t need to kiss the ass of literary establishment to write something that’ll make grown-ass adults questions their life choices.  He was the sort of writer who looked at conventional narrative structure, laughed maniacally, and then proceeded to craft stories that hit you in the liver like a surprise audit from the IRS.

He won the Pulitzer back before the Pulitzer became a meaningless joke for The Time of Your Life – because apparently the universe has a sense of humor about timing – and then had the balls to initially reject it.  Fuck yes!  He basically told the (at the time) most prestigious literary award in America to sit on it and vigorously spin.  Also check out The Human Comedy.

Fast-forward (or rewind, depending on your relationship with linear time and sobriety) to 1837, when Ralph Waldo Emerson dropped the mic before mics were even invented, and  stood up at Harvard – again, back when Harvard was prestigious, and not a cesspool of anti-Americanism and antisemitism – and basically told American literature to grow a pair and stop copying its European homework.

“The American Scholar” was a literary declaration of independence wrapped with enough intellectual firepower to level a small philosophy department.  Emerson looked at American writers who were still desperately trying to sound British and said, essentially, “Why are you like this?”

The man had the audacity to suggest that American writers should – brace yourself, dear reader – write about America.  Revolutionary stuff, right?  Except it really was.  Before Emerson’s verbal smackdown, American literature was about as authentically American as a gas station sushi roll.

Up next…it’s We Love Memoirs Day.  I don’t usually appreciate the declaration of “Days,” to any particular cause or whatever, but since memoir is the genre I usually work in, why the hell not?  Memoirs are the literary equivalent of that friend who has absolutely no filter after three drinks: uncomfortable, brutally honest, and somehow exactly what you needed to hear.

The memoir is where we writers go to bleed on the page and somehow make it beautiful.  It’s the genre that says, “You think fiction is wild?  Hold my therapy bills.”  These are the books that make you realize your own problems aren’t so bad, or alternatively, make you question every life choice you’ve ever made.  Both outcomes are equally valid and equally entertaining.

There’s something pleasantly masochistic about diving into someone else’s trauma and calling it entertainment.  But hey, at least we’re honest about it now.  We’ve collectively decided that raw, unfiltered human experience is worth celebrating, which is either deeply profound or deeply disturbing, depending on your philosophical stance and B.A.C.

Finally, August 31, 1888 gives us the discovery of Mary Ann Nichol’s body in Whitechapel.  The first acknowledged victim of Jack the Ripper, a name that would launch a thousand terrible crime novels and enough conspiracy theories to keep internet forums busy until the heat death of the universe.

Here’s the thing about Jack the Ripper: he’s become literature’s favorite boogeyman, inspiring more truly terrible prose than a creative writing workshop after happy hour.  The man (presumably) committed horrific crimes and somehow became a cultural icon, which says something most people find deeply unsettling about our collective psyche that they don’t want to examine too closely.

The Ripper murders have spawned everything from scholarly dissertations to graphic novels to what can only be described as “fan fiction,” and honestly, that last category should probably worry you more than it does.  But there’s something about the combination of mystery, Victorian atmosphere, and genuine horror that keeps writers coming back like addicts.

What do these ridiculously disparate things have to do with each other, besides the date?  I don’t know.  Maybe nothing.  The birth of a literary rebel, a transcendentalist’s declaration of cultural independence, a celebration of oversharing as an art form, and the beginning of history’s most literary murder spree.  Yeah, nothing in common except occurring on August 31.

Which is today.  And if that’s not worth raising a glass (or six) to, then frankly, you’re taking this whole “literary appreciation” thing far too seriously.  Sometimes the best way to honor great writing is to acknowledge that it’s all beautifully, chaotically, magnificently insane – much like the people who create it and the people who consume it with the desperation of the chronically under-caffeinated.

Cheers.

N.P.: “Twinkle Twinkle Little Star – Minor Epic Version” – Rok Nardin

Apologies for my absence here yesterday, dear reader.  The whole day was nuts.

It began, as the best catastrophes do, with a mission of supposed sincerity and not nearly enough plausible deniability.  I was meeting Boochie for the express purpose of breaking the news – no Governor of California run, not for me, no way, not in this disastrous calamity of a state.

“Balls!” he said when I first told him.  “I thought that Kamala not running would be all the greenlight you’d need.”  I explained to him gently that what I really wanted to do was fight Governor Newsom, and since he’s not running in 2026, I wouldn’t even get a chance to debate him in a gubernatorial election.  Instead, I was throwing my questionable political capital behind Steve Hilton, because if you can’t be the candidate, at least endorse the guy who wears better shoes and probably doesn’t keep an emergency bottle of whiskey in his glove compartment.  So there’s that.

But you try explaining political strategy to a man three-quarters of the way through a bottle of something that tasted like the secretions of a vengeful forest spirit.  Boochie’s grin was all teeth and impending litigation, the rictus of either a prophet hallucinating the cosmos or a rat about to chew through a power line.

I delivered my little non-campaign speech, complete with what I though was sincere gravity, and Boochie blinked at me over the rim of a glass so dirty it may have predated refrigeration.

“So we’re not getting rich off graft and lobbyists.  What do we do now?  We should form a band.  Serious.  We need to make some real money.”

It’s a fact universally acknowledged – but rarely celebrated – that drunken logic breeds the great ventures of our age.  The scene: a particularly derelict dive in Fair Oaks where the paint flakes had both more character and less mold than most of the clientele.  The jukebox, naturally, seemed to be looping a twelve-minute opus that sounded suspiciously like a missile strike.

“The problem,” Boochie mused, ignoring that I had never asked, “is one of texture.  Of sonic grit.”  Modern music, he raged, had all the substance of a gluten-free communion wafer and all the bite of a neutered Yorkie.  His gesticulations nearly decapitated a man who may or may not have been part of the original construction crew of this shithole.

Meanwhile, I was deep in contemplation, deciphering an extremely crude cocktail menu that seemed equal parts alchemy and cry for help.  My notes from the evening, if you can call the napkin I later found fused to my wallet a journal, dwell in the realm of the tragicomic: “The existential dread of a dropped olive.”  If Kierkegaard had access to better olives, Danish philosophy would be very different.

There, amid the wreckage of my nascent political career and the sticky floor mosaic of spilled spirits, the fateful suggestion bloomed.  Boochie, drunk on somewhere between capitalism and literal gasoline, wanted a band.  A proper moneymaking operation.  Not just another yowling indie outfit doomed to obscurity, but something abrasive, unignorable, actively hostile to decency and taste – a sonic cleansing with a belt sander.  An industrial band.

“But the name,” Boochie slurred with entrepreneurial verve, “It’s gotta haunt people.  You want ’em to choke on their own curiosity.”

We plowed through suggestions like the local wild turkeys pecking at a landfill.  “Satan’s Power Drill.”  “Asbestos Nursery.”  “Cyborg Death Wish.”  All disqualified for either legal reasons or insufficient shock to the cardiovascular system.  I even through out “Bootie Juice,” which, if I ever started a funk band (which I’ve always wanted to do, real talk), but he vetoed it: “I do like ‘Boochie Juice, though…but not for this project.”  Alas.  And then, like a message from the universe’s deeply problematic uncle, it appeared: “We Want Children For Dinner”

The silence that followed could have been bottled and sold to Scandinavian nihilists.  Even the ancient crypt-keeper in the corner roused, possible from the afterlife.  The jukebox sputtered and died in shame.

It was the apex (or, more appropriately, the nadir) of bad taste – a perfect, monstrous idea.  It implied headline news, missing persons reports, a culinary theme better suited for litigation than lunch.  But it also sounded like money.  Or so Boochie insisted, and at that moment, with sobriety negotiating a surrender, I wasn’t equipped to disagree.

Handshakes.  Terrible vows.  An oath sworn over the ruins of a night that shouldn’t be immortalized but probably will be.  The post-midnight adventures unraveled predictably: a philosophical spat with a parking meter, the futile pursuit of tacos in a city hostile to dreams, a dissertation-level debate over whether squirrels can experience ennui.

Morning arrived like a SWAT team.  Skull pounding, tongue coated in oxidized pennies, I excavated from the disaster-area Safe House a napkin.  On it: “First album title: Lullabies for the Abattoir.”  Lordy.  We may not have a government to run, but apparently, we’ve got a band to start – or, more accurately, a creepy financial venture and a murder of hangovers to outlast.  Who knows?  In this world, only the deeply unserious have a fighting chance.

But never mind all that.  Today, August 28th, is a day of cosmic convergence, a chronological pile-up of such staggering, brain-melting significance that it makes you wonder if the universe is just a high-concept practical joke scripted by a committee of high-as-fuck philosophy majors.  On this day, two absolute titans were shot into this mortal coil, separated by a mere 168 years but spiritually joined at the hip like some kind of weird, metaphysical, world-building conjoined twin.

I’m talking, of course, about Johann Wolfgang von Goethe and Jack “The King” Kirby.

Yes, you heard that right.  The German Übermensch of letters, the dude who gave us Faust and basically invented the modern goth concept of feeling all your feelings in a very dramatic, poetic way.  And the King of Comics, the human dynamo from the Lower East Side who drew gods and monsters with a pencil stub, birthing entire universes crackling with cosmic energy dots, a.k.a. Kirby Krackle.  It’s the literary equivalent of pairing a fine, aged Riesling with a fistful of Pop Rocks.  And it is glorious.

Let’s start with Goethe, born way back in 1749.  Dude was a one-man Enlightenment party.  He was a poet, a playwright, a novelist, a scientist who argued about the nature of light, and probably, if you checked his journals, a surprisingly good clog dancer.  He penned The Sorrows of Young Werther, a novel so emotionally potent it allegedly sparked a wave of copycat suicides across Europe, making him the original influencer of bespoke misery.  Then he drops Faust, a story about a guy who sells his soul to the devil for unlimited knowledge and, let’s be honest, a better social life.  It’s a sprawling, impossibly dense masterpiece that I, having failed to get to it earlier in the semester, once tried to read in a single weekend.  The attempt left me questioning my own sanity and the structural integrity of the English language itself.  Goethe was operating on a level of pure, uncut genius that most of us can only squint at from a safe distance.

Then, fast-forward to 1917.  The world is a different kind of chaotic, and out of this industrial grinder pops Jacob Kurtzberg, soon to be known as Jack Kirby.  While Goethe was wrestling with existential dread in iambic pentameter, Kirby was busy creating a new mythology with ink and pulp paper.  Captain America punching Hitler in the jaw?  That was jack.  The Fantastic Four, a dysfunctional family with superpowers bickering their way across the galaxy?  Jack.  Thor, the Silver Surfer, the New Gods, Darkseid – all modern archetypes, splashed onto the page with an explosive, kinetic force.  He art was much more than just “drawings” – they were detonations.  Every panel is a testament to raw, untethered imagination.  His figures are all barrel chests and impossible angles that lesser artists are still trying to rip off today.  He gave us a visual language for the sheer, pants-wetting awe of the cosmos, all while chain-smoking a cigar and meeting impossible deadlines.

So what, you might ask, dear reader, besides a shared birthday, connects the Weimar classicist with the King of comics?  Everything.  Both were architects of worlds.  Both stared into the abyss of the human condition – the struggle for knowledge, the temptation of power, the clash between gods and mortals – and wrestled it onto the page.  Goethe gave us Mephistopheles, the charming, urbane demon whispering deals in our ears.  Kirby gave us Galactus, the planet-eater, a force of nature so vast it rendered mortality irrelevant.  They were both dealing with the same big-ticket questions, just using different toolkits.

So tonight, let’s raise a glass.  To Goethe, for making existential despair so eloquent.  And to Kirby, for showing us that the universe is a weird, wonderful, and often violent place filled with gods who look suspiciously like they spend a lot of time at the gym.  Happy birthday to both of you.  Thanks for making reality a little more interesting.  The hangover will be worth it.  Probably.

N.P.: “Bob George” – JaGoFF