Category Archives: Lucubrations

Jayson Gallaway

April 19, 2019

I went to check out the super fabulous pink moon or whatever the hell it is, but there is cloud cover over The Creek tonight, obscuring the view.  Still, it must be one hell of a full moon, because even from behind the clouds, it’s putting out very bright light.  And the clouds add a rather pleasant dramatic aspect.  Kind of looks like a CGI night sky in a Dracula remake.

N.P.: “Waiting for the Worms” – Pink Floyd

Watching what’s been happening in New Zealand since the shooting in Christchurch has been interesting.  And in many  ways, predictable.  The government is doing what it thinks it can do to prevent another such shooting.  What was shocking to me was to hear members of the United States Congress applaud and point to the New Zealand Prime Minister’s actions as examples for what we should do in this country.

I have several English friends with whom I have long-running and very good-natured dialogues where we give each other shit about the inferiority of the other’s country and/or people.  They refer to us as “the colonists,” and I am quick to remind them that I am a citizen of my country, whereas they are lowly subjects of Her Majesty Elizabeth Regina.  They tend to struggle at this point in our discourse.

As I see it, the difference between a subject and a citizen is contained in the First and Second Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

The First Amendment guarantees me the right to say whatever the hell (short of libel, slander, or direct threats or calls to violence, of course) I want about any member of any level of our government, from the president all the way down to the local code enforcer.  I can compose invective, horrendously insulting critiques, I can mock them in published cartoons and lampoon them viciously on late night TV.  And they can’t do a damn thing about it because regardless of what office they may hold, they are all citizens just like me.  But the Queen is royalty.  She is superior to my friend Nigel, who is and shall forever be her subject.  At any time, I can run for any office in the land.  If I or any other citizen gets the required number of signatures and has enough money to pay various fees, we can run for whatever office we want, including the presidency.  There is nothing Nigel can ever do to become royalty.  And thus, his speech regarding the Queen Mother is quite limited, and though in present-day England speech is in practice relatively free, in other royal-ruled countries, speaking out against or even insulting the king or any member of the royal family can and will result in arrest and prosecution of crimes against the crown, with the punishments being long and difficult prison sentences and in many countries, death.

The Second Amendment guarantees me the right to defend my First Amendment rights if anything happens to the government and they go rogue.  For example, say there is a military coups, the military suddenly controls the federal government and all commercial media outlets.  They impose martial law, declare a suspension to the Constitution, clamp down on free speech, and begin violating other Amendments and provisions of the Constitution:  with the Constitution “suspended ” (so their “logic” would go), the Second Amendment is no more, and soldiers will be coming around and confiscating all weapons.  And with the Third Amendment also gone in this scenario, when the soldiers in your neighborhood need sleep after a long day of confiscating weapons, they can just come into your house, kick you out, and turn your home into a temporary barracks.  All of this, of course, would be completely illegal and unconstitutional, but it could happen, and it is for that scenario that the Second Amendment exists: most of the amendments are clear limits on governmental power, and with the system of checks and balances the Founders put into place, the various branches of government are pretty effectively set up to police each other and prevent such a scenario from ever unfolding.  But because it could happen, the Second Amendment says that citizens have not only the right but the duty (“necessary to the security of a free State”) to keep and bear arms.  Weapons.  What kind?  Whatever kind it would take to take on and defeat the United States military when they show up on your block arrest you for speaking out against the illegal coups, to seize your weapons, and to take over your house.  There would be no one to call…you’re going to have to handle this yourself.  And those fuckers have state of the art body armor, fully automatic assault weapons.  They have  tanks. Helicopters.  The Second Amendment says nothing about hunting.  It has nothing to do with recreation or obtaining food.  It specifies a “well regulated militia.”  I’ll assume you know what a militia is, but many seem to be confused by the modifier “well regulated.”  It does not mean regulated by the government.  Well regulated means trained and proficient.  Ready to mobilize at any moment.

So the government of New Zealand banned assault weapons.  Which they can do, according to their constitution, which noticeably lacks any provisions for free speech or right to keep and bear.  Why?  I would argue that they are subjects of the crown as well, though that legally ended in 1948 when they were reclassified as citizens.  But to quote Tyler Durden, sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken, and reclassifying someone as a citizen does not necessarily give them any additional rights.  The real test, for me, anyway, is to see who is on the money: if the Queen is on your money, you’re a fucking subject.  If you weren’t, you would have taken her old ass off your money.  You know, like we did.  But no…there’s the Queen on your money, so no right to keep and bear for you.

And though you may be thinking that you have free speech in your country, if your country has a Chief Censor, I dare say your speech is not at all free.

So this week, New Zealand’s Chief Censor, who had banned the live-streamed footage of the attack and the manifesto Brenton Tarrant cobbled together (quite poorly), had six people arrested for distributing the video, with each now facing 14 years in prison.  Fourteen years.  My goodness.

But they can do that.  Because they have a very different constitution than ours.  Which is fine.

What gets me about this, again, is that there are sitting politicians here in the U.S. advocating the actions of the New Zealand government as appropriate here, when in fact those very actions would be cause for our well regulated militias to maybe convene and begin discussing tactics.

N.P.: “Dance Hall Days – Orchestral Version” – Wang Chung

Whaddup, dear reader.  I am having to admit that I have vastly more ideas that I have time to write them out.  I get these ideas of things I’d like to say, things I want to tell you, or sometimes things I want to do with the books or one of the other projects and this is how they appear: usually there is just a single idea…a sentence.  It just appears.  So as I’m studying it and looking at it from various angles (this is usually done subconsciously or very close to that as I am likely doing something totally different consciously, like attempting to converse with someone), another idea branching off the original one appears, also in the form of a sentence.  Once there are two sentences about the same subject, they sort of become postulates in a “logical” argument.  So if A is the case, and B is the case, then C, which appears as a third sentence.  After further mental marinading, D, a fourth sentence, appears, and this is usually what I think of A being true, B being true, and what I think of C, what I think of people who think C, whatever.  Sometimes D is what I think C should be (even though it isn’t), and what a better place the world would be if more people agreed with me about C, et cetera.

And see…this is what happens.  That paragraph you just read supra…that was supposed to be one sentence.  When I started typing the sentence, my intention was to type one sentence, and now look at us, all the way down here at the bottom of the page.  Jesus.

I meant to tell you that rather than jot the ideas down for another time when I have more time to expound on and expand the core ideas, and then never getting back to it and the ideas just languish away in the ether, I was going to try to limit myself to maybe a paragraph, with just the key ideas.  Which I fear may result in an experience exactly no different than reading a tedious business email.

Okay…tomorrow.  Tomorrow I promise you I give you the bare bones version of what I’m thinking, rather than putting it on the shelf for the rest of forever.

Okay…gotta get back to the book.

N.P.: “Far Side of Crazy” – Wall of Voodoo

The last couple of days have been a bit of a dud.  Probably more than the last couple.  But the last couple were me sitting in front of this keyboard, the file from the the book that I needed to work on was open on the screen, the blinking cursor more or less mocking me for not typing.  Then there would be a burst of 7 or 10 words, then nothing for another how ever long.  Some days that’s all one can do.


There are two clusters of headlines in my “Health” feed, one that is amusing, the other less so.  The first story was about a Swiss study just released that concluded that men’s beards are, for the most part, swimming with disease and are a breeding ground for microbes and germs that are harmful to humans.  The study concluded that if you captured a feral dog that had lived its entire life in a toxic landfill, and you used that dog to scrub all the toilets in your house, that the fur on that dog will have no where near the number of microbes found in the average hipster beard, which beard, much like the average hipster himself, is composed primarily of fecal matter and infectious bacteria.  Which is hilarious, because most of the hipster girls I know with beardy boyfriends are spectacularly germophobic.  Fortunately hipsters cherish irony above all else, so they should find the situation amusing.

The second item was about something else swimming with disease, but something that I value far more than hipsters.  Researchers in Israel have found that petting zoos are home to numerous dangerous antibiotic-resistant bacteria including two strains that cause foodborne illnesses and urinary tract infections.   Which is just lame.  I can do without hipsters, but I’m really rather fond of petting zoos.

N.P.: “Obsession” – Animotion

.

Dream #4776

Last night I accidentally doubled up on the Ny-Quil and also the desk whiskey,  Ended up falling asleep fully clothed.  I dreamed I was the lead singer and keytar player for a satanic funk band called Beelzabooty.  We were on stage in the lobby of the Hotel Nelson in Tijuana, thumping our way through our latest single, Booty Juice.  The bass player, an African Canadian dude named Bro, was struggling to operate his “Beelzabong” (patent pending) that was actually built into his bass.  There was no one else in the lobby except for the desk clerk, a lugubrious middle-aged Mexican man named Jose (natch) who had seen so much human horror from that front desk during the last 20 years that he is completely unfazed by literally anything, especially some satanic funk band that’s playing in the hotel lobby for absolutely no reason except that some weird writer in California was having a self-inflicted fever dream.

That’s when I was awoken by the sound of a pair of fornicating cats outside of my open window finishing up.  The female of the pair yelled out that ghastly shriek that female cats let out whenever the male cat withdraws his feline peen.  I did not appreciate being awakened midst dream.

Did you know, dear reader, that cat penises are barbed?  Yep, they are…hence that ghastly shriek.  If you believe in God, you have to admit that making things like painfully barbed penises kind of make Him an asshole.  That, or He just really doesn’t like cats.  Cuz that’s just mean.

N.P.: “Green River” – M. Ward

Feeling pretty sub-great today, intellectually attractive reader.  Frustrated.  Stagnant.  Kinda down, kinda defeated.

I am working on this really funny thing, but because of its subject matter, it could be that no one will ever read it.  But it’s that sort of shit that has me frustrated.  Ugh.  What’s the bright side?

I did get just over 4 hours of restful sleep last night.

See…things are getting better all the time.


Speaking of things that may never be read.  I could probably use some species of manager.  The Vault is getting completely unwieldy.  There are 350+ free-floating undeveloped ideas, about 50 more developed essays in various stages of completion, and then 4 book-length projects, also in various states of completion.  The problem is that each day I’m just adding new things to these piles, rather than going back and working on things that are already in there.  I do try, on occasion.  I’ll dedicate a day to sort of curating the vault, but it’s fairly impossible for me to figure out where to start.  Even if I have an idea of what I want to work on, I’ll see something I’d forgotten about and get distracted with that.  Then while rereading that, I’ll get some other idea for something totally different, open a new file, and start typing.  It’s madness.  Madness with no perceptible forward motion.  Hence, frustration.

N.P.: “Planetary Space Child” – Ruby the Hatchet

I’m pretty sure the time I got up “this morning” was still technically last night.  The Watch says I got 1 hour and 8 minutes of restful sleep.  That’s not enough for a growing American Literary Menace.  This calls for Ny-Quil, desk whiskey,  and Andy Warhol’s Diary.

N.P.: “Man on the Silver Mountain” – Rainbow

Spotify subscribers recently received an addition to their subscriptions in the form of a free Hulu subscription (with ads) now included in their monthly rate.  Great.  So now I have…four…four subscription services piping in really great new movies and TV shows at a rate far greater than any one person (or at least this any one person) could possibly watch.  (By the way, Hulu…I would never pay for a subscription that included ads.  That’s simply not how the internet works.)
And but so anyway, I was poking around my new Hulu account and found their Fyre Festival documentary, Fyre Fraud.  So I gave it a watch.  Good God.
I’ve expressed to you in recent weeks my frustration with the apparent complete fucking dearth of critical thinking skills amongst the American Herd, so I don’t mean to single out millennials for special criticism…they are no more gullible than any of the other dolts walking around claiming to be “informed, educated” Americans.  The Fyre documentary, however, does call special attention to a particularly egregious surrendering of critical thinking skills by millennials which is embodied by the presence of social media “influencers.”   As in that is a valid job title.  Which is absurd.  My initial response was to call them “manipulators,” but that would be giving them far more credit than they deserve: they aren’t actually doing any manipulating.  Manipulating, to me, is controlling another person to act in a way that you want them too, sure, but it is understood that the person would not act in that way had they not been manipulated, otherwise, why bother?  But that’s not the case here: the people being “influenced” are doing so not just willingly, but eagerly,
It’s depressing.  Maybe I should start a cult and take over the world for a while.
N.P.: “If Looks Could Kill” – Transvision Vamp

The Welcomed New Irrelevance of the Media.

It was still Thursday night here when Brenton Tarrant walked up to a mosque on New Zealand’s Friday afternoon and opened fire on several dozen unarmed civilians in prayer.  Soon after Tarrant was captured at a second mosque, various new services began sending out breaking news alerts around the world.  Simultaneously, messages from darker presences deeper in the web started sending out messages as well: “He lived streamed it,” and “There’s a manifesto.”
A couple of clicks later and I had the manifesto and was watching what appeared to be helmet-cam footage of the entire shooting recorded live. And it was right around that point that the media lost their collective shit.  In a fairly fine flash the media, which had morphed rather desperately and pathetically from decent journalism into a commentary/interpretation/dissemination service, saw that it had been rendered superfluous and pointless.  Almost immediately, the media coverage focused intently and rather angrily at Facebook and YouTube for 1) allowing people to stream anything live, and 2) seeming to be unable to remove the postings of the videos at the same rate they were being propagated.  These articles seemed to outnumber and outpace updates on the actual shooting.  At that point, I went to sleep.
When I woke up the next morning, the articles seemed to have evolved quickly as the media struggled to grasp what had happened and exactly what to do about it.  The headlines were all slight variations on this theme: If You Downloaded the Video, Here’s Why You Shouldn’t Watch It.  A couple of these articles were allegedly by mental health professionals attempting to protect the psychological welfare of the unwashed masses, but most seemed to be by “journalists” who seemed to be primarily interested in protecting their jobs, and a huge reason the media exists these days is their access to “the wire” – raw footage of events that would historically not be released to the public because it is on some level too extreme.  So the media served as a sort of filter/censor.  If you wanted to see the available footage from any news incident, you tuned in to the news outlet of your choice and watched.  But this dude had done an end run completely around the middleman of the media and streamed his content live directly to everyone on Facebook and YouTube.  In the first 24 hours after the shooting, Facebook reported that it had removed 1.5 million videos from its pages, but that even that was not enough to come close to stopping or even containing the dissemination of the video.
And very quickly after that, by the following morning, the media seemed to totally back away from stories about the footage and began running stories about what was going on with New Zealand and its government in the aftermath of the shooting, which is probably what they should have been reporting on.  The following day the two big articles about the shooting were 1) about how the Prime Minister of New Zealand was doing what she could to prohibit the use of Tarrant’s name so as not to give him the infamy he craved (a decision which, while I understand and appreciate why it was made nonetheless disagree with), and 2) a vividly detailed scene-by-scene description of the video (which seemed an embarrassing last-ditch attempt by the media to analyze (they used to determine what footage was seen, and they would of course provide commentary and analysis, so even though viewers of the video clearly didn’t need commentary or analysis, they did it anyway, almost like a reflex)) what had happened.  Both of these efforts seemed like rather futile and pathetic attempts the either put the genie back in the bottle, or just pretend it never got out in the first place.  The world had already seen the video, the world already knew his name and had already read his words.
I am reminded of the Church’s desperation when literacy began spreading rampantly and the Holy Roman and Apostolic began having difficulty controlling the flock that was rapidly becoming educated.  I’m also reminded of the music industry when mp3s and Napster showed up.  Their actual message for years was “Here is why you should not download music for free but instead pay us for a lesser quality product: because that’s the way it’s always been and thus that is the way it’s supposed to be. We’ve been ripping you off for decades because, well, we could because we controlled the supply, and it is somehow your moral duty to let us keep ripping you off.”
I can’t help but remember how the Unabomber, Ted Kaczynski, and the Zodiac Killer had to basically beg/extort news outlets to publish their manifestos.  No more.  Suddenly the media is relegated to the sidelines, unable to even play catch up with the news stories being live streamed directly from the source.  “Oh, you already have the video?”  Yep.  “I see.  Well, do you need me to explain it to you?”  Nope.  “Hmmm.  Okay,  Would you like to hear my opinions and what I thought of the video?”  Nope.
So several million people downloaded the video, me among them…what about that?  Where they deviants?  Sadistic, hateful perverts who would find such a video entertaining or in any way enjoyable to watch?  Did they endorse Tarrant’s murder spree, or support his ideology?  I’m sure there were instances of that…the web reaches some unbelievably dark places where even innocent and innocuous YouTube videos of children’s birthday parties are viewed by malicious eyes with dark intent.  I suspect the majority of people who accessed the video did so with the exact same intent as they had in the past when they tuned into a news network to find out the latest on a story.  Only here they were offered The Story in pure, unadulterated form without having sit through advertisements, patronizing commentary, and interviews with “experts” wringing their hands and trying to assign academic or sociological meaning to the whole thing.
N.P.: “Better As One” – The Heavy