Monthly Archives: May 2025

May 21, 2025

 

We go from bees to teas, dear reader, as today—May 21st, this very annum of our collective unraveling, 2025—is International Tea Day, a evidently hallowed 24-hour span where we’re supposed to genuflect before the steaming altar of Camellia sinensis and its myriad permutations. Tea, that ubiquitous elixir, that alchemical slurry of leaf and water, which, let’s be honest, is less a beverage and more a civilizational crutch, a liquid tether to sanity for billions. It’s the drink that’s been sloshing through human history since some ancient Chinese mystic decided to boil a bush and call it divine. And here we are, centuries deep, still worshipping at the porcelain shrine of the teacup, still chasing that delicate, tannic high.

Imagine: a world awash in tea, from the bone-white cups of Darjeeling in Kolkata’s crumbling colonial haunts to the chipped mugs of truck-stop Earl Grey in some godforsaken Midwestern diner. Tea is the great leveler, the one addiction we don’t whisper about in shame. It’s the morning jolt for the bleary-eyed salaryman in Tokyo, the afternoon ritual for the tweed-drenched Brit, the late-night muse for the poet scribbling in a Marrakesh souk. It’s the drink that says, “I’m functional, but only just.” And on this day, this International Tea Day, we’re supposed to celebrate it—not just the leaf itself but the whole sprawling, caffeinated cosmology it drags in its wake.

Let’s not kid ourselves, though. The tea-industrial complex (aka Big Tea) isn’t all Zen and jasmine-scented transcendence. It’s a brutal, sweaty business, rooted in the calloused hands of pickers in Assam and Yunnan, where workers—mostly women, let’s not dodge the optics—pluck leaves under a sun that doesn’t give a damn about fair trade certifications. The supply chain is a labyrinthine nightmare, a global pinata of exploitation and middlemen, where every sip of your artisanal oolong carries the faint aftertaste of someone else’s misery. And yet, we sip. We steep. We pontificate about mouthfeel and terroir like we’re auditioning for a Wes Anderson film. The hypocrisy is exquisite, a Möbius strip of self-awareness and denial.

I think we’d be remiss on this International Tea Day to not talk about coffee, that overrated, bean-derived sludge, the poor man’s stimulant for those too impatient to court the sublime. Coffee is a sledgehammer—crude, bitter, a one-note adrenaline spike that leaves you jittery and hollow, like you’ve just mainlined an Excel spreadsheet. Tea, by contrast, is a scalpel, a symphony, a goddamn love letter to nuance. Where coffee stomps in with its acrid, burnt-rubber swagger, tea seduces with layers—floral whispers, earthy depths, astringent kicks that evolve with every sip. Coffee chains you to the grind, a caffeinated hamster wheel; tea liberates. You want health? Tea’s got antioxidants out the ass, while coffee’s just a diuretic middle finger to your kidneys. The choice is clear, you philistines: tea is the poet, coffee the propagandist.

But screw the guilt for a second—tea is also magic, pure and simple. It’s the only drug you can serve at a toddler’s birthday party without raising eyebrows. It’s the potion that fueled the Opium Wars (irony thicker than a London fog), the Boston Tea Party (revolution in a crate), and every late-night dorm-room bull session that ever veered into the meaning of life. Green, black, white, oolong, whatever the hell pu-erh is—it’s a spectrum of obsession, a taxonomy of taste that makes wine snobs look like dilettantes.

And the ritual! Oh shit, the ritual. The kettle’s banshee wail, the precise alchemy of water temperature (too hot, you scald the leaves; too cold, you’re drinking lawn clippings). The slow bloom of the infusion, the way the steam curls like a ghost’s finger beckoning you to some ineffable truth.  That’s fuckin’ poetic.  It’s meditative, sure, but it’s also a subtle fuck-you to the instant-gratification slot machine of modern life. Tea demands patience, demands you sit still and shut up for five goddamn minutes. In a world of algorithm-driven dopamine hits, that’s practically punk rock.

So here’s the deal, you jittery, over-caffeinated reprobates: today, on International Tea Day, pour yourself a cup. Doesn’t matter if it’s a $200-an-ounce Silver Needle or a Lipton bag you swiped from a motel breakfast bar. Raise it to the pickers, the blenders, the smug baristas who correct your pronunciation of “matcha.” Raise it to the billions who’ve made tea their north star, from samurai to suffragettes. Then drink deep, caffeinated reader…let the warmth hit your marrow, and feel the world slow down just enough to remind you you’re still human. Or at least close enough.

N.P.: “Fuck Me Up” – Pokey LaFarge

May 20, 2025

 

Today, dear reader, is allegedly National Bee Day, some granola-crunching, flower-crown-wearing, save-the-planet hippie holiday that’s got everyone cooing over the fuzzy little pollinators like they’re the second coming of Christ in a yellow-and-black tracksuit. And yeah, I’ll concede—bees are the least contemptible of the insect world’s miserable menagerie. They’ve got their pollination gig, their honey hustle, which, let’s be honest, is a goddamn miracle of nature, a golden elixir that laughs in the face of expiration dates. Bees, with their chubby, fuzz-dusted thoraxes and that almost endearing bumble-waddle, are the only bugs that don’t make me want to reach for a flamethrower. Kids dress up as bees for Halloween, for Christ’s sake—those little sugar-fiends know a mascot when they see one. Nobody’s out there trick-or-treating as a wasp, because wasps are the sociopathic cousins who’d steal your candy and piss in your pumpkin.

But let’s not get too misty-eyed. My general disposition toward insects isn’t fear—fear implies they’ve got some kind of upper hand, some psychological leverage. No, it’s contempt, pure and unadulterated, a seething, bone-deep loathing for the skittering, buzzing, biting bastards that seem to exist solely to fuck with humanity. Scorpions? Those armored little psychos with their smug, pincered swagger and venom-tipped tails? I’d rather square-dance with a rattlesnake. Camel spiders? Jesus wept, they’re like something Hieronymus Bosch dreamed up after a bad acid trip—eight-legged nightmares that look like they’d eat your soul if they could figure out exactly how to chew it. No fear, mind you—just a visceral desire to see them obliterated, preferably by a meteor strike.

Most insects are just evolutionary fuck-yous, pointless irritants that contribute nothing but chaos. Hornets and wasps?  There’s no justification for their existence, no ecological PowerPoint presentation that could convince me they deserve a place on this planet. They’re like the drunk uncles of the insect world, crashing the picnic, stinging for no reason, and leaving everyone worse off. Zero redeeming qualities. Zilch. Nada. They don’t pollinate, they don’t make honey, they just dive-bomb your beer and ruin your day. If I could Thanos-snap one species into oblivion, it’d be a coin toss between those two.

Even the so-called “good” insects, the ones that eat other insects, are barely pulling their weight. Spiders, for instance—sure, they munch on flies, but let’s not pretend they’re out there waging some noble war on pestilence. They’re lazy, web-spinning opportunists who maybe catch a gnat once a week, then sit there like smug little landlords collecting rent. Inefficient doesn’t even begin to cover it. A single bat could clear out more bugs in a night than a spider could in a month, and bats don’t make you scream when they scuttle across your pillow at 3 a.m.

But bees—regular, non-Africanized, star-spangled American bees—they’ve got a pass. They’re the blue-collar heroes of the insect kingdom, clocking in to pollinate the flowers that keep our ecosystems from collapsing like a house of cards in a windstorm. Their honey is a sticky middle finger to entropy, a substance so perfect it’s practically immortal. And yeah, they’ve got that cute little aesthetic going—those stripes, that fuzz, that buzz that’s more charming than menacing. You don’t see kids dressing up as scorpions or camel spiders, because no one’s writing love letters to a creature that looks like it crawled out of Satan’s anus.

So, fine, National Bee Day, I’ll tip my hat to you. I’ll raise a spoonful of honey and toast the one insect that doesn’t make me want to nuke the planet from orbit. But the rest of the creepy-crawly brigade? The wasps, the hornets, the scorpions, the camel spiders, the whole chitinous cabal? They can burn. I’m not afraid of them. I just hate them with the white-hot intensity of a thousand suns. And if that makes me the villain in some vegan’s insect utopia, so be it. I’ll be the one with the honey jar, laughing while the rest of the bug world gets what’s coming.

N.P.: “Switchblade” – Link Wray

May 19, 2025

 

There’s too much nudity in this society.  Literally everywhere you look, regardless of what you’re looking at, it seems like you can’t go 10 seconds without some girl who doesn’t know how to wear a bra coming into frame, turning around, and twerking.  We reached critical mass with this years ago.  It actually got to the point where such things were no longer interesting, on a sexual, sociological, psychological, or any other level to most men.  In my case, it now elicits nothing but an eyeroll from yrs. truly.  I never thought I’d say this, dear reader, but fully clothed, even conservatively clothed women are now far sexier and attraction-inducing than their scantily clad, ass-jiggling sisters.  I am actually hopeful that our ridiculous culture does a take a hard turn back to the way things were when you had to a lot more than buy a $5/month subscription to see some girl’s butthole.

That having been said, I have tragic news on this completely mundane Monday: the neon-orange heart of Americana is bleeding out.  Hooters – yes, Hooters, dear reader, that bastion of buffalo sauce and unapologetic cleavage – has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, and the news hit me like a barstool to the skull.  “Son of a bitch!” I said when I first heard the reporting.  This isn’t just another restaurant chain gasping its last (we’ve had plenty of those recently); it’s a cultural artifact, a garish monument to a bygone era when we could still wink at our baser instincts without a morality cop screaming from the digital rooftops.  The end of Hooters is the end of something bigger, something raw and reckless, and I’m sitting here, gut-sick, watching the vultures circle.

The numbers are indeed grim, a $376 million debt pile that smells like overcooked ambition and undercooked strategy.  Hooters of America, one of the two outfits slinging wings and dreams, threw in the towel back in March, citing the usual suspects: inflation, labor costs, and a dining public that’s apparently too woke or too broke to drop $20 on a pitcher and a plate of curly fries.  Many of the restaurants are still open, limping along under the Chapter 11 umbrella, but the vibe is funereal.  Sure, the waitresses still smile, but it’s the smile of a boxer who knows the next punch might be the knockout.

Enter Hulk Hogan, of all people, striding into this mess like a bleached-blond-and-bandana’d deus ex machina.  The man who body-slammed Andre the Giant now wants to suplex Hooters back to relevance.  Through his Real American Brands, Hogan’s tossing an all-cash bid for the chain’s intellectual property.  Not the restaurants themselves…he’s not here to flip burgers or mop floors.  No, the Hulkster’s eyeing the brand, the logo, the mythic Hooter’s essence, to slap on beer cans, T-shirts, and maybe a slot machine or two.  His camp calls it a “perfect match,” a chance to resurrect Hooters as a symbol of “unfiltered Americana – fun, fearless, and proudly American.”  Fuck yeah.  Hogan’s Real American Beer, already a hit in Clearwater dives, was one of the first beers Hooters ever poured, so there’s history here, a kind of sweaty, fist-bumping loyalty.  But can a 71-year-old wrestling legend, more caricature than capitalist, really drag this sinking ship to shore?  I want to believe, but my faith is as thin as those shitty paper napkins at Hooters happy hour.

Hogan’s not alone in this crusade.  The original Hooters founders, led my Neil Kiefer, are clawing their way back into the game.  They’re part of a buyer group snapping up 151 corporate-owned locations, promising to steer the chain toward (mainstream acceptability.”  Translation: ditch the bikini nights, swap the low-cut tanks for something less likely to offend the TikTok censors, and maybe throw in a kale salad for the health nuts.  Kiefer’s got skin in the fight – his crew runs 30% of the franchised spots, including the top-grossing ones – but the plan feels like a betrayal to me, a neutering of the very soul Hooters once flaunted.  They’re betting on a family-friendly pivot, but who’s taking their kids to a Hooters for chicken tenders when Chuck E. Cheese is still wheezing along?  It’s a desperate gambit, and desperation is a lousy architect.

The private equity sharks, Nord Bay Capital and TriArtisan Capital Advisors, still own the carcass, but they’re not exactly weeping into their martinis.  They’ve been milking Hooters for years (heh), and now they’re ready to offload it to whoever’s dumb enough to bet on a comeback.  The bankruptcy court’s got the final say, and the clock’s ticking – 90 to 120 days, they say, before Hooters either rises like a big-breasted phoenix or gets carved up like a discount turkey.

What stings the most is the symbolism.  Hooters was a middle finger to propriety, a greasy, glorious celebration of excess in a world increasingly obsessed with sanitizing everything.  It was where you went to forget the cubicle, the mortgage, the slow drip of modern life.  Now it’s another casualty in the culture wars, another tombstone in the graveyard of casual dining.  Red Lobster, TGI Fridays, Buca di Beppo – they’re all crumbling, and Hooters is just the latest to stagger.  The American appetite for shared plates and shared fantasies is shrinking, and I’m left wondering if we’ve lost the stomach for joy itself.

Hogan’s bid, Kiefer’s buyout – they’re sparks in a storm, flickers of hope or maybe just denial.  I want to root for them, to believe that somewhere, in some dive bar of the soul, Hooters can still serve up a plate of wings and a side of defiance.  But the air’s heavy with defeat, dear reader, and the jukebox is playing a requiem.  Pour one out for the owl, friends.  I’m afraid the party’s over, and the tab’s come due.

N.P.: “I Want To Know What Love Is” – Laibach

May 18, 2025

 

Gather close, sexy and nocturnal reader.  Today we celebrate the publication of a tome that has, since it’s unholy genesis on May 19, 1897, served as nothing less than the sanguinary keystone of gothic literature: Bram Stoker’s Dracula. More than a novel, Dracula is a veritable cathedral of dread, its spires of epistolary prose piercing the fog of Victorian propriety to reveal the pulsating, crimson heart of fear itself—a fear that is, at its core, an exquisite commingling of the erotic and the eschatological, the known and the unfathomable (damn, that was sexy, if I may say so myself).

For those of you who didn’t spend your university years dissecting the entrails of literary theory—perhaps you were sensibly studying something practical, like engineering, or simply avoiding sunlight for reasons I shan’t pry into—let me illuminate the epistolary form, which Dracula wields like a silver dagger. An epistolary novel is one told through letters, diary entries, newspaper clippings, and the like, a narrative stitched together from fragments of personal accounts, as if you’re piecing together a shattered stained-glass window in a crumbling cathedral. In Dracula, this means we experience the creeping horror through Jonathan Harker’s meticulous journals, Mina Murray’s desperate letters, and Dr. Seward’s clinical notes, each voice a flickering candle in the dark, revealing the Count’s shadow through their fractured perspectives. It’s intimate, voyeuristic, and maddeningly fragmented—like eavesdropping on the last confessions of the damned.

Stoker’s masterwork, you see, is less a narrative than a palimpsest (look it up) of primal anxieties, its pages dripping with the ichor (look this one up, too…I borrowed it from Poe’s The Conqueror Worm from last night’s reading) of the unknown—those tenebrous forces that slink beyond the candlelit periphery of human understanding. Through the diaristic machinations of Harker, Seward, and the ill-fated Lucy Westenra , Stoker conjures a Count who is not merely a monster, but a metaphysical rupture—a walking, stalking lacuna in the fabric of modernity, his castle a labyrinthine memento mori where time itself curdles like blood in a chalice. The novel’s exploration of sexuality—veiled, yet throbbing beneath the surface like a carotid artery—anticipates Freud by a hairsbreadth, its subtext a gothic danse macabre of repression and release, wherein Mina’s purity is both shield and sacrificial altar, and Dracula’s bite a perverse Eucharist, transubstantiating innocence into damnation (c’mon, dear reader…who else gives you “transubstantiating innocence into damnation” on a Sunday?).

And the influence! My god, the influence of this sepulchral text sprawls like a plague-ridden shadow across the cultural firmament—its tendrils ensnaring film, theater, and the collective unconscious with a rapacity that would make the Count himself proud. From Murnau’s Nosferatu to Coppola’s baroque fever-dream, from stage adaptations that revel in crimson melodrama to the modern horror renaissance that owes its very lifeblood to Stoker’s creation, Dracula remains a cultural juggernaut, its themes of alienation, contagion, and the seductive pull of the abyss as resonant in 2025 as they were in 1897.

Initially a modest success, Dracula has since metastasized into the very DNA of vampire mythology, its legacy a testament to the enduring power of literary horror to excavate the darkest recesses of the human (and perhaps inhuman) psyche. Read it, I implore you, beneath the flicker of a dying candle, and feel the chill of eternity seep into your bones. In its pages, you’ll find a reflection of the void—and the terrible, beautiful hunger that dwells within it.

N.P.: “The Last Path Home” – CHANT

May 17, 2025

Greetings, attractive reader.  Today we rewind the tape to May 17, 1824 – a date that ought to be seared into the cerebellum of every self-respecting lit nerd, a day that marks not just a loss but a cultural felony so egregious it makes you want to scream into the void, or at least shotgun a bottle of absinthe in protest.  I’m talking about the incineration of Lord Byron’s diaries and manuscripts, a scorched-earth operation orchestrated by his publisher, John Murray, with the complicit nods of Thomas Moore and other so-called custodians of the poet’s legacy.  These manuscripts weren’t just scribbles and doodles…they were the raw, unfiltered synaptic firings of a man whose very name still conjures storms of passion and rebellion, a man whose life was a dirty bomb detonated in the lap of the staid Regency establishment.  And yet, in a fit of sanctimonious hand-wringing over Byron’s “scandalous” reputation (oh, the horror of a poet who dared to live as he wrote!), they torched it all, reducing to ash what might’ve been the Rosetta Stone of Romanticism.  This, dear reader, is what some have called “one of the worst literary crimes ever committed,” and they are not wrong – they’re just not loud enough.

For those of you who aren’t Initiates in the Dead Poets Society, I’ll unpack this travesty with the kind of clarity that only hindsight and a righteous fury can provide.  Byron, dead at 36, had already been buried at Westminster Abbey, his body barely cold in the ground when his supposed allies decided his legacy needed a good, old-fashioned Puritan cleansing.  The man had lived a life that was, as we have discussed here recently, a high-wire act of excess and genius – seducing half of Europe, penning verses that could make angels weep and devils blush, and generally giving a throbbing, glowing middle finger to every moralistic busybody who crossed his path.  His diaries, his manuscripts, his private correspondence were artifacts, the kind of primary-source gold that scholars would have killed for, the kind of material that could’ve given us a front-row seat to the mind of a poet who redefined what it meant to be a rock star before the term every existed.  Imagine the confessions, the unexpurgated rants, the late-night jottings of a man who once wrote, “I awoke one morning and found myself famous.”  Imagine the secrets, the loves, the hates, the sheer electric hum of a consciousness that burned that hot.  Now imagine it all going up in flames because a handful of pearl-clutching Victorians couldn’t handle the heat.

John Murray, the ringleader of this literary lynch mob was Byron’s publisher, a man who’d made a fortune off the poet’s words, a man who should’ve known better.  But Murray, along with Thomas Moore and the rest of the crew, decided unilaterally that Byron’s reputation – already battered by rumors of incest, sodomy, and general debauchery – needed “protection.”  Protection from what, exactly?  From the truth?  From the messy, glorious humanity that made Byron who he was?  This wasn’t protection; this was erasure, a deliberate attempt to sanitize a man whose entire existence was a fuck you to sanitation.  They burned the very essence of what made him dangerous, what made him real.  And in doing so, they robbed us, the future, of a chance to grapple with Byron on his own terms, to see the man behind the myth without the filter of Victorian prudery.

Here’s a fun mental exercise for perspective: imagine, for a moment, that someone decided to take the letters of Emily Dickinson or the journal notes of Virginia Woolf and use them to kindle a campfire.  Picture Franz Kafka’s senselessly neurotic scribblings turned to ash because someone thought they didn’t look flattering for Kafka, Inc.  The stomach churns, does it not, dear reader?  Now amplify that sense of loss and ruin until it feels properly global, because that’s what this burning was.  We’re not talking about a few stray poems or doodles on cocktail napkins.  Byron had poured himself into these volumes, and their destruction was nothing short of full-on cultural vandalism.

No one knows what was in hose diaries for sure, which is particularly maddening.  Were they full of crude jokes?  Quiet admissions of regret?  Detailed records of those countless, juicy scandals that followed him like a bad smell?  Or maybe all of the above.  Whatever we lost, if was irreplaceable, and the really sad part is that Murray, Moore, and the rest knew it.  They reportedly burned the pages in small bundles, and at least one of them admitted to sobbing during the process.  Even as they were committing this literary arson, they understood they was erasing something extraordinary.

This was a crime!  A cultural heist of the highest order, and we’re still paying the price 200 years later.  The loss of those manuscripts is a gaping wound in the body of literary history, a black hole where insight should be.  We’re left with the polished, published works, sure…Don Juan, Childe Harrold, all the hits…but what about the rough drafts, the half-formed thoughts, the diary entries where Byron might have let his guard down and shown us the cracks in his Byronic armor?  What about the letters where he might’ve spilled the tea on his lovers, his enemies, his own fractured psyche?  We’ll never know, because a bunch of stiff-collared cowards decided that posterity couldn’t handle the unvarnished truth.  And that, dear reader, is the real scandal – not Byron’s life, but the fact that we were denied the chance to fully understand it.

So here we are, on May 17, 2025, exactly 201 years after the face, and I’m still pissed.  I’m pissed because the burning of Byron’s papers wasn’t just an act of cowardice – it was an act of arrogance, a declaration that some stories are too wild, too raw, too real to be preserved.  But isn’t that the whole point of literature?  To confront the chaos, to dive headfirst into the maelstrom and come out the other side with something true?  Byron did that every goddamn day of his life, and he deserved better than to have his inner world reduced to cinders by men who couldn’t handle the fire.  So let’s raise a glass to a poet who lived without limits, and let’s curse the small-minded fools who thought they could contain him by burning his words.  This is the sort of shit that keeps me awake at night, dear reader, howling at the moon for a glimpse of what we’ll never get back.


In better and more temporally local literary news, the book is finally taking shape, emerging from its amorphous, unfocused blob form into an at least somewhat coherent structure.  Remember those deep focus pictures all the hipsters were hanging on their walls in the early-2000s?  The ones that people would stare at for some ridiculous amount of time, waiting for their eyes to “relax” and “unfocus” to the point where they could see the hidden picture?  And then when you finally saw the picture, you celebrated briefly, then you couldn’t not see it, and then you’d wonder why it took you so long to see it in the first place?  That’s what it was like the other night as I was looking over what I had written so far, when I finally saw the hidden picture.  I smiled.

Anyway, I must be getting back to it.

N.P.: “Love Me Two Times” – The Mission

May 16, 2025

 

Today, dear reader, we’re diving into a shadowy corner of American literary history that’s as haunting as the tales it inspired. On May 16, 1931—yep, you read that right, though I suspect the date might be a typo for 1836, since Poe passed in 1849—Edgar Allan Poe, the master of the macabre, married his 13-year-old cousin, Virginia Clemm.

By today’s standards, this marriage raises every red flag in the book. A 27-year-old man tying the knot with a 13-year-old girl—his own cousin, no less—was a bold defiance of social norms, even in the 1830s. Back then, marrying young wasn’t unheard of, and cousin marriages weren’t as taboo as they are now, but this union still turned heads. Poe and Virginia’s relationship was a middle finger to convention, a theme that bled into every chilling tale and mournful poem he penned. The controversy alone could’ve made headlines, but Poe wasn’t one to shy away from the dark and forbidden—his life mirrored the eerie worlds he created.

Virginia, often described as delicate and ethereal, became Poe’s muse in the most haunting way. Works like The Raven and Annabel Lee are steeped in her influence, their melancholic beauty reflecting her frail health and early death at just 24 from tuberculosis in 1847. Poe’s obsession with death, loss, and the supernatural wasn’t just artistic flair—it was deeply personal. Virginia’s decline and passing shattered him, fueling the raw, anguished emotion that makes his writing so timeless. You can almost feel the weight of his grief in lines like “Nevermore” or the aching longing of Annabel Lee’s “kingdom by the sea.” Their marriage, though troubled by her illness and Poe’s own struggles with alcoholism and poverty, gave his gothic legacy a visceral, lived-in edge.

But let’s not romanticize this too much. The age gap and familial ties make this a hard pill to swallow, even for the most diehard Poe fans. Some scholars argue Poe saw Virginia more as a sisterly figure than a wife, at least initially, and that their bond was more platonic than passionate. Others point to the cultural context of the time, where such arrangements weren’t as shocking. Either way, it’s a stark reminder of how Poe’s life was as turbulent and unconventional as his stories—always teetering on the edge of societal acceptance, much like the crumbling houses and unhinged narrators he wrote about.

This marriage not only shaped Poe’s work, but also helped redefine American literature. Poe’s fearless embrace of the dark, the taboo, and the deeply personal carved out a space for the gothic tradition to flourish. He wasn’t afraid to plumb the depths of human despair, and his union with Virginia gave him a front-row seat to tragedy. So, the next time you’re shivering through The Tell-Tale Heart or whispering The Raven’s refrain, remember the real-life heartbreak behind the words—a love story as doomed and defiant as any Poe ever dreamed up.


Switch gears now…I hear from the hippies that today is ostensibly Endangered Species Day.  So, on this Endangered Species Day, May 16, 2025, permit me to eschew the lachrymose dirges for some benighted amphibian or ichthyic obscurity and instead hoist a tumbler—Jack Daniels, no ice, thank you—to the most critically endangered taxon of our epoch: Scriptor Americanus Badassus, the Badass American Writer. This isn’t your milquetoast MFA drone or some clickbait-churning digital serf. Nay, this is a whiskey-guzzling, iron-packing, censor-defying, chaos-conjuring literary berserker, teetering on oblivion’s brink, harried by the dual hydras of governmental overreach and social media’s sanctimonious inquisition. Strap in, dear reader, for I shall delineate, with Friday’s typical verbosity (resulting from consumption of a Triple Mocha Frozen Coffee and no fewer than four (4) Dunkin’ donuts) and a certain outlaw panache, why this species merits veneration and preservation above all others on the endangered roster.

Dig, if you will, the Badass American Writer in their primordial milieu: a dive bar redolent of stale Marlboros, a manual typewriter hammering like an M-16 on full auto, a fifth of bourbon perspiring profusely beside a dog-eared Moleskine, and a snub-nose .38 nestled in the small of the back, lest some apparatchik or algorithmically empowered prude dare intrude. Their phenotypic markers? They imbibe with the fervor of a desert prophet, curse with the baroque flourish of a Elizabethan cutthroat, and brook precisely zero nonsense from any quarter—be it federal, corporate, or the perpetually aggrieved Twitterati. These are the scribes who craft narratives that flay the epidermis from polite fictions, who hurl verities like grenades into the complacent agora. They don’t dabble in ephemeral “threads”; they etch tomes in blood and brimstone. And, alas, they are vanishing, extirpated with ruthless efficiency.

Whence this peril? The etiology is multifarious yet depressingly banal. The state, that Leviathan of bureaucratic cupidity, slathers “disinformation” warnings on anything with a pulse, its tentacles probing every syllable for subversive intent. Social media, those panopticons of performative virtue, exile dissenters to the shadowlands with a keystroke, their terms of service a guillotine for the insufficiently meek. And then there’s the cultural clerisy, those pursed-lipped arbiters who recoil at a well-placed expletive or the whiff of unfiltered Camels in a public space. Scriptor Americanus Badassus does not genuflect to such pieties. They’d sooner torch their oeuvre than submit to the red pen of a content moderator. But this intransigence exacts a toll. Publishers, craven as ever, shun them. Platforms throttle their reach into oblivion. The mob, wielding hashtags like pitchforks, brands them “toxic.” Extinction looms, and it’s clutching a fucking style guide.

Now, to the crux: why does this species outstrip all others—your pandas, your rhinos, your esoteric mollusks—in deserving salvation? Pandas, for all their photogenic charm, are evolutionary cul-de-sacs, too indolent to procreate sans human intervention. Rhinos, while formidable, aren’t out here penning jeremiads that recalibrate the national conscience. But the Badass American Writer? They are the sine qua non of a free polity, the final bulwark against a world hellbent on muzzling truth and planing down anything with an edge. Their prose is an arsenal of ideation, each paragraph a claymore detonated in the face of orthodoxy. They safeguard the republic’s soul, a task no other species can claim. Without them, we’re doomed to a monochrome dystopia of approved narratives and content warnings.

How, then, to stave off their demise? First, dismantle the censorial apparatus—let these writers breathe, blaspheme, and provoke without fear of digital crucifixion. Second, patronize their work; seek out the tomes banished by school boards or algorithmically consigned to obscurity, and buy them in bulk. Third, amplify their defiance. When some platform immolates a writer for “violating community standards” (read: daring to exist), raise a clamor louder than a Harley at full throttle. And finally, the area I’m attempting to support,  cultivate successors. Inculcate in the young an appetite for strong spirits, straight shooting, and prose that doesn’t flinch. Breed Scriptor Americanus Badassus, not another cohort of screen-addled supplicants.

So here’s to the Badass American Writer, the most endangered and indispensable of creatures. They fight not merely for their own survival but for the survival of a world worth inhabiting. Raise your glass, chamber a round, and join the insurgency. For if we let them perish, we surrender the fire that keeps this nation from dissolving into a tepid, sanitized abyss. Long may Scriptor Americanus Badassus reign. Let’s ensure their saga doesn’t end in a footnote.

—One of the Few Badass American Writers, still out there, raging against the dying of the light.

N.P.: “Magic (Macy’s Theme)” – Stimulator

May 15, 2025

 

Dear Skutch, you festering carbuncle on the ass-end of civic leadership,

I’m writing to you from the greasy edge of despair, mainlining black coffee, whiskey, and rage, because your little Podunk hellhole—Fecal Creek, CA, a name so on-the-nose it might as well be a metaphor for your administration—has become a labyrinthine death trap of traffic circles that would make Dante himself weep into his beard. I’m talking about the roundabouts, Skutch, those asphalt whirlpools of doom that have popped up like zits on a teenager’s face over the last five years, turning every drive through this town into a white-knuckled, zig-zag gauntlet of despair. It’s outrageous, man, a cosmic-level fuck-up that reeks of your special brand of ineptitude.  It’s depressing the shit out of me, Skutch.  We were good friends…I thought we had a relationship.  But this ridiculousness has made me question everything I thought I knew about you.

Let’s break this down, you bureaucratic bottom-feeder. Five years ago, Fecal Creek had one traffic circle—a quaint little novelty, a roundabout with delusions of grandeur that the locals could handle with a shrug and a prayer. But now? Now you’ve got them everywhere, Skutch, metastasizing across the town like some kind of malignant urban cancer. I drove through seven—seven!—of those godforsaken loops just to get from the the Safe House to the Burger King last Tuesday, each one a fresh circle of hell where the rules of physics and human decency go to die. The drivers here, Skutch, they’re old and scared and absolutely not equipped for this. They’re simple folk, raised on straight lines and stop signs, not this European nonsense you’ve foisted upon them. They weave and zag like drunks at last call, their eyes wide with terror, their hands trembling on the wheel, and I’m one of them, man, screaming into the void as I dodge a Prius driven by a soccer mom who’s clearly on her third Xanax of the morning.

And here’s the kicker, you soulless suit: the good people at the Fecal Creek Police Department (FCPD) are clueless. For the last two years, every single driver they’ve pulled over for DUI has been sober—sober, Skutch! These poor bastards aren’t drunk; they’re just trying to navigate your dystopian hellscape of roundabouts without losing their minds. But the FCPD, in their infinite wisdom, assumes every erratic turn is a sign of bourbon-fueled rebellion, so they slam these innocent souls down Main Street, cuffing them in broad daylight while the real crime—your urban planning disaster—goes unpunished. It’s a travesty, a grotesque miscarriage of justice, and it’s all on you.

I can see you now, Skutch, over there in your Mayoral Loft, sitting in your faux-leather mayor’s chair, ignoring the phone, probably sipping a lukewarm Coors Light while you dream up new ways to torment your constituents. You thought, “Hey, roundabouts are trendy! They’ll make Fecal Creek look cosmopolitan!” But you didn’t stop to think about the human cost, did you? You didn’t consider the existential dread of a 77-year-old retiree named Doris who just wants to get to her bridge club without being sucked into a vortex of perpetual left turns. You didn’t think about the kids on their bikes, the delivery drivers, the stray dogs who now live in the median of Circle Number Four because they’re too scared to cross. You’ve turned this town into a Kafkaesque nightmare, a place where the very act of driving feels like a punishment for sins we didn’t even know we committed.

And don’t even get me started on the special needs of Fecal Creek drivers, Skutch. These folks were barely managing the old grid system, and now you’ve thrown them into a geometric Thunderdome where the only winners are the tow truck companies and the shrinks treating everyone for roundabout-induced PTSD. Back when the traffic circles started sprouting, they seemed like they might need a little extra TLC—maybe a few more signs, a driving class or two—but now? Now they don’t stand a chance. You’ve abandoned them, Skutch, left them to fend for themselves in a world where “yield” is a foreign concept and “merge” is a declaration of war.

So what’s your endgame, huh? Are you trying to drive us all insane so you can sell the town to some Silicon Valley tech bro who wants to turn it into a drone delivery hub? Or are you just so drunk on your own power that you get off on watching us suffer? Either way, I’m calling you out, you miserable son of a bitch. Fix this. Tear down the roundabouts. Give us back our straight roads, our stoplights, our sanity. Or I swear to God, I’ll rally every last one of these shell-shocked drivers, and we’ll march on your office with pitchforks and tire irons, demanding your resignation in the key of pure, unadulterated rage.

This is what it feels like to live in your Fecal Creek, Skutch—a recursive loop of frustration and futility, where the infrastructure itself becomes a metaphor for the failure of late-stage capitalism to address the basic human need for a straight fucking line.¹

Do better, or we’re coming for you.

With all the love of a howler monkey in estrus,
The Writer Formerly Known As Jayson

¹ And if you think I’m exaggerating, Skutch, try driving through Circle Number Six at rush hour with a toddler in the backseat screaming about goddamn Paw Patrol while a semi-truck driven by face-tattooed illegals con riflés cuts you off and a gang of wild turkeys decides it’s the perfect time to cross the road. Then tell me I’m wrong.

N.P.: “Think Twice (Version X)” – Jackie Wilson & LaVern Baker

May 14, 2025

 

Gather round, younger readers, because grampa’s about to wax nostalgic for a time when danger was the spice of life, when we played hard and lived harder, before the world got overrun by a bunch of sniveling, bubble-wrapped snowflakes who can’t handle a little risk without clutching their emotional support water bottles. I’m talking about Lawn Darts—those glorious, foot-long harbingers of chaos, with their weighted metal spikes and plastic fins, designed to be lobbed underhand at a plastic ring on the grass, sticking into the earth with a satisfying thunk that said, “Yeah, I’m alive, and I’m not afraid to prove it.” They were the backyard gladiator’s weapon of choice, a game that separated the reckless from the timid, and I miss them with the kind of aching, bone-deep longing that makes me want to scream into the void until the universe gives me back my damn Jarts®.

Picture this: it’s the 1970s, and you’re a kid in the suburbs, the sun beating down on your un-sunscreened shoulders because nobody gave a rat’s ass about UV rays back then. You’ve got a set of Lawn Darts—12 inches of pure, unadulterated potential, a metal tip that’s not sharp enough to look dangerous but heavy enough to do some real damage if you’re careless, which, let’s be honest, we all were. You’d stand 35 feet from the target, or closer if you were feeling particularly unhinged, and you’d toss those bad boys with a flick of the wrist, watching them arc through the air like a Roman plumbata—yeah, those ancient war weapons from 500 BCE that inspired this whole beautiful mess—hoping to land a ringer and score three points, or at least get closer than your opponent’s throw to snag a measly one point. It was a game of skill, sure, but also a game of guts, because you had to stand there while your buddy chucked a metal spear in your general direction, and if you flinched, you were the loser in more ways than one.

But here’s the rub, the dark little footnote that makes the safety police clutch their pearls: Lawn Darts were dangerous as hell, and they racked up a body count that would make a slasher flick blush. From 1978 to 1986, the Consumer Product Safety Commission tallied 6,100 emergency room visits—81% of the victims were under 15, half under 10, with most injuries to the head, face, eyes, or ears, leaving kids with permanent scars, blindness, brain damage, the works. Three kids didn’t make it out alive—a 4-year-old, a 7-year-old, and a 13-year-old, their lives snuffed out by a game that was supposed to be fun but turned into a tragedy when a dart went astray, piercing a skull with the force of 23,000 pounds per square inch, according to one researcher’s estimate. The tipping point came in 1987, when David Snow’s 7-year-old daughter, Michelle, took a dart to the brain in her own front yard, thrown by a neighbor kid who didn’t know any better. Snow went on a one-man crusade, hounding the CPSC until they banned the sale of Lawn Darts outright on December 19, 1988, urging parents to destroy their sets and keep them away from kids. Canada followed in 1989, and just like that, the Jarts® were gone, relegated to the black market of flea markets and yard sales, where they still lurk like forbidden fruit, tempting the brave and the stupid.

Now, I’m not saying those injuries and deaths weren’t heartbreaking—because they were, and I’m not a complete monster—but let’s talk about why it’s time to lift the ban and bring back Lawn Darts in all their perilous glory. We’re 37 years past that 1988 ban (which is personally unbelievable…seems like just yesterday), and in that time, we’ve raised generations of the softest, most coddled kids this planet has ever seen, kids who’ve never known a world without safety nets, both literal and metaphorical, who’ve been swaddled in so much bubble wrap they can’t even handle a scraped knee without a therapy session and a participation trophy. These snowflakes have grown into adults who are terrified of their own shadows, who’d rather sip oat milk lattes and whine about microaggressions than face the raw, unfiltered reality of life. They’re clogging up society with their weakness, their endless need for validation, their inability to take a risk and survive the consequences, and frankly, there are too damn many of them. We need to thin the herd, and I don’t mean that in some dystopian, eugenics-fueled fever dream—I mean it in the primal, Darwinian sense that says if you’re too dumb to dodge a Lawn Dart, maybe you’re not cut out for the long haul.

Bringing back Lawn Darts isn’t just about nostalgia; it’s about restoring a sense of toughness, of resilience, of living life on the edge and not crying to the government to save you when things go south. We’ve got trampolines killing 11 people between 2000 and 2009, skateboards claiming 40 lives a year, swimming pools drowning 390 kids annually, and hot dogs choking far more children under 14 than Lawn Darts ever did—yet we don’t ban those, because we understand that life comes with risks, and mitigating them is on us, not some faceless bureaucrat. The CPSC’s ban was a knee-jerk reaction, a capitulation to a culture that’s forgotten how to let kids be kids, to let adults be adults, to let us all take responsibility for our own goddamn choices. Lawn Darts taught us that—taught us to be careful, to be aware, to respect the danger and still have a blast, because what’s the point of living if you’re not willing to tempt fate every once in a while?

So here’s my demand, you pencil-pushing cowards at the CPSC: lift the ban on Lawn Darts, effective immediately, and let us badasses reclaim our birthright. Let us toss those metal-tipped beauties across the lawn again, let us feel the adrenaline of a near miss, let us laugh in the face of danger and teach the next generation what it means to be alive. The snowflakes can stay inside with their iPads and their safe spaces—we’ll be out back, playing a real game, thinning the herd one ill-aimed throw at a time. Because if we don’t toughen up this society, if we don’t reintroduce a little chaos into the mix, we’re doomed to a future of mediocrity, and I, for one, would rather go down swinging with a Lawn Dart in my hand than live in a world that boring.

N.P.: “Girl U Want” – Robert Palmer

May 13, 2025

Dearest readers, friends, miscreants, and assorted malcontents, I regret to inform you that we’ve reached a new nadir in the never-ending corporate hijacking of art, rebellion, and everything holy that once made rock’n’roll a weapon, not a beige commodity slathered in nostalgic platitudes and sold back to us like overpriced junk at a yard sale.  What I am referring to, nay railing against with every ounce of venom my synapses can muster, is insult of cataclysmic proportions masquerading as a “Sex Pistols” tour.  Newsflash, you clueless cash-drunk husks clinging desperately to your fading youth like it’s an oxygen mask on crashing plane: without Johnny Rotten (John Lydon), it is NOT the Sex Pistols.  It’s a farce.  A sideshow.  A garishly bad cosplay act smeared together with the sticky residue of corporate nostalgia and aged opportunism.

I’ve been up most of the night having a goddamn fit about this, dear reader.  I mean, really, who are we kidding here?  Two original members.  Two.  That’s what we’re left with.  A skeletal, emaciated version of one of the most incendiary bands whose sheer existence once sent puritanical tabloid hacks scurrying to their typewriters in terror.  Nobody would have ever even heard of Steve Jones and Paul Cook if not for the raw, uncontainable vitriol that spewed out of Johnny Rotten like a Hellfire missile shot at the vinyl-soft underbelly of 1970s British society.  But here they are, zombifying the entire concept of the Pistols, dragging its bloated, lifeless corpse onto a stage to jiggle it around as if that crude facsimile could even begin to conjure the anarchic genius that defined the real deal.

And for what, exactly?  Spare change?  Relevance?  Some morbid desire to prove to themselves that they weren’t just side characters in Rotten’s caustic, venomous opera?  Because whatever it is, one thing is abundantly clear: it’s not integrity.  It’s not art.  It’s not even rebellion.  It’s the opposite of rebellion.  It’s compliance.  And worse, it’s embarrassing.


The Sex Pistols I remember would never have done this.  My first memory of them was when I was about 8.  My mom was driving us to church, and we’d listen to a Top 40 radio countdown show.  One week, Dick Clark or whoever it was came on and announced there was no #1 song on the British charts that week because the #1 song that week was, in fact, God Save the Queen by the Sex Pistols, which song had been banned in England.  The BBC and many independent radio stations refused to play it, and major retailers declined to stock it, Dick said, due to its controversial lyrics and timing, coinciding with Queen Elizabeth II’s Silver Jubilee.  As an 8-year-old in suburban America, I did not have enough of an understanding of England’s politics or culture at that time to truly appreciate the lyrics, but the song itself was unmistakenly assaultive.  It made me want to sneer, which was new to me at 8.  Fast forward a couple of years…I was still a kid living in Suburbia and I remember hearing about Sid Vicious dying in New York City.  That one made me want to both sneer and change my name to something as awesome as Sid Vicious.  The next time the Pistols showed up on my radar was just after I graduated from high school with the release of Sid & Nancy, the biopic released in 1986, directed by the execrable Alex Cox and starring Gary Oldman as Sid and Chloe Webb as Nancy.  Though Johnny Rotten said the movie had a “duff script,” and its historical accuracy has been oft-debated, the film quickly became a cult classic, and I was very much a member of that cult.

Big jump to August 23, 1996…I was in my mid-20s and living in San Francisco when I saw the original Sex Pistols line up (with bassist Paul Cook resuming his role) when they brought their Filthy Lucre Tour to the Shoreline Amphitheater in Mountain View.  That reunion tour marked the first time the band had performed together since their initial breakup in 1978, and it was amazing.  And I would be remiss in not mentioning my trip to Manhattan in 2000, when I first visited the Chelsea Hotel, where Sid and Nancy had been living in Room 100 when Sid allegedly stabbed Nancy to death in October, 1978 (Sid was charged with her murder but died of a heroin overdose before the case could go to trial).  The room numbers had been changed, but sneaking up the stairway to the first floor, I felt some very heavy vibes in that place (not just from the Sid debacle, but the many other personally influential artists who had lived there).  I decided it would probably be interesting to spend a year living in the Chelsea, but that never came to fruition as I started having a lot of success as a freelance writer in San Francsico.  Whilst living in San Francisco, I was a frequent patron of the Beni Hana in Japantown, which Beni Hana was located in the same mall as the Miyako Hotel (now the Hotel Kabuki), where Sid famously walked through a glass door during the Pistols’ infamous 1978 U.S. tour.  That chaotic incident occurred on January 14, the same day as the band’s final show at the Winterland Ballroom.  Sid, in a drug-fueled haze, smashed through the glass door, injuring himself in the process.  When I’d come stumbling out of Beni Hana, toweringly drunk on sake bombs and Sapporo, I’d often threaten to go around the corner and go ploughing through the glass doors as a sort of moronic tribute to Sid.  Fortunately my people never allowed that to happen.  I say all this just to show that for good or ill, the Pistols have oddly informed many instances in my life as I was growing up.  But I do digress.  Returning to the travesty at hand…which was the shameful bastardization of the greatest punk band in history.


Because, believe it or not, dear reader, this fever dream somehow gets worse.  What got me really worked up about all this nonsense was hearing that this contraband knockoff of the Sex Pistols has been invited to open for Guns N’ Roses?  G’n’F’nR?!  Far be it for me to throw shade at Axl Rose, who, for all his faults, has at least managed to preserve the rough-edged lunacy of his legacy (even if he has done so while occasionally resembling a sleep-deprived Willy Wonka whose chocolate factory has long since closed).  But endorsing this sacrilege?  Giving this shameful cover band some shred of legitimacy by lending them a prime spot on your globally adored, pyrotechnic-heavy circus tour?  C’mon, Axl.  Is there no sense of responsibility anymore among the elders of this subculture we once dared call “countercultural”?  How much more abuse can the spirit of punk endure before it just curls up and dies, exhausted, in the corner of some overpriced arena hosting another “nostalgia night”?

This absurd Karaoke Kabuki is insulting, not just to the legacy of punk or the Sex Pistols themselves, but to anyone who once believed in the raw, pugilistic necessity of rock as an art form.  Anyone who screamed along to “God Save the Queen” or shredded their vocal cords to “Anarchy in the U.K.” because for once, someone out there seemed real.  Rotten wasn’t just a front man…he was the face of punk’s refusal to be nice, digestible, or safe.  He was the shard of glass tucked under the rug, the sputtering voice that declared with full, unrestrained fury that everything the establishment told you to believe was a bowl of beige horseshit.  He was the heart.  The lungs.  The fire.  And without him?  Without him, the Sex Pistols are just a hollowed-out carcass, trotted out in front of audiences who don’t seem to care that their rebellion has been taxidermized and sold back to them at $120 a ticket.

This isn’t punk, this is pantomime.  A travesty wrapped in a tragedy, shaved down into a palatable consumer “experience.”  And I, for one, refuse to clap politely as legends deface their own mythology for another damn payday.  Rotten may be absent from the stage, but his spirit cries foul from the shadows, mocking this grotesque imitation for what it is.  A scam.  A theft.  And a reminder that no matter how loud their amps, Jones and Cook have proven that the sound of desperation is deafening.

N.P.: “L F C L” – Public Image Ltd.

Happy Mother’s Day!

Happy Mother’s Day, dear reader!  In honor of this auspicious day, I’ve written a poem.  It’s called Take Yo Mama to Brunch.  To wit:

Take yo mama to brunch,
Oh, don’t you dare delay,
She’s dealt with all your bullshit,
Now it’s her time to play.

She’s wrangled your tantrums,
Survived your disgusting smells,
And answered your dumbass questions,
Like, “Do pickles have shells?”

Now she deserves towers
Of waffles and cream,
A buttery croissant
And an endless mimosa stream.

Pile her plate with pancakes,
(Bacon on the side!)
chocolate-dipped bananas
And some sort of French toast slide.

The waiter arrives
With quiche in his grip,
But Mom grabs her fork
And takes a wild dip!

She’ll laugh as she slurps
From a fruit smoothie shoe,
Then orders an omelet
Made for an entire crew.

You’ll sit there observing,
Mouth open, aghast,
How can one tiny mama
Eat so goddamn fast?

Then she’ll pat her tummy,
Smiling and sly,
“Oh sweetie, what’s next?
Shall we order some pie?”

Take yo mama to brunch,
She’s earned every bite,
But don’t you dare forget
To tip her just right.

For her love is a buffet,
Endless and true,
And that’s why your mama
Deserves a brunch for two (or three…or nineteen, depending on how many her appetite can destroy in one sitting).

N.P.: “Take Your Mama” – Scissor Sisters